Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 8

CNR DLCT02038998202408 Sept 2026
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 8 · 08 Sept 2026 · CNR DLCT020389982024

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4 Cr. Case 16112/2024 STATE Vs. AVSHANI 26/2024 (Railway Sarai Rohilla)
08.09.2026
Present: Sh. Vinod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
Accused Ashwani @ Ashu @ Jadu in person alongwith Ld.
Counsel Ms. Urmila Kumari.
Perusal of record reveals that offence u/s 379/411 IPC has already
been compounded vide order dated 09.07.2026.
An application alongwith affidavit for plea-bargaining qua the
offence u/s 356 IPC has been filed.
Put up for consideration before pre-sitting Lok Adalat today itself.
(Vaibhav Garg)
JMFC-11/Central/THC
08.09.2026
After 30 min.
PRE-SITTING LOK ADALAT
Present : Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Accused in person alongwith Ld. counsel.
Accused has filed an application seeking Plea-bargaining along
with the requisite affidavit. As per previous conviction report of the accused, he
is not previously convicted for the same or similar offence.
Ld. Addl.PP accepts the notice on behalf of State. Heard. Record
perused. Let the accused be examined in Camera.
After examining the accused in-Camera, this court is satisfied that
the application for Plea-Bargaining has been filed by accused voluntarily and
without any undue pressure or coercion.
Accused, Ld. Addl. PP for State and IO after having meeting to
enter a mutually satisfactory disposition of the case have reported to the Court
that a mutually satisfactory disposition of the case has been worked out between
Contd….
-- 1 of 2 --
the parties, wherein accused voluntarily agrees to plead guilty for offence u/S
356 IPC and Ld. Addl. PP for State & IO have raised no objection for the same
and that the accused has agreed that he shall not repeat the offence in future and
that the accused shall undergo the punishment as will be imposed by the court.
(Accused) (Addl. PP for State) (IO)
Separate statements of the accused have been recorded which are
annexed with this order.
Court has heard the mutual satisfactory disposition of case worked
out by the parties, the process of which has been completed voluntarily by the
parties. Court is satisfied that there is no impediment to dispose of the present
case through plea-bargaining.
In view of the mutual satisfactory disposal of the case upon the
application moved on behalf of accused for plea-bargaining, accused stands
convicted for the offence punishable u/S 356 IPC.
Submissions on the point of sentence heard.
In the facts and circumstance of the present case and accused is
sentenced to the period of imprisonment already undergone
Let the file be put up before Lok Adalat for disposal on 10.10.2026.
(Vaibhav Garg )
Judge Lok Adalat Pre-Sitting
Delhi/08.09.2026
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.