Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

KRISHANVsKAVITA SHARMA

CNR DLCT020335492025790-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 06
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 15 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
6571/2026
Registration Date
13 Apr 2026
Next Hearing Date
04 Nov 2026
Case Stage
Misc./ Appearance

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1KRISHAN

    Respondent

    1. 1KAVITA SHARMA

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Civil Lines
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 08-07-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 04-11-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 33549/2025
Filing Date: 26-07-2025
eFiling Number: ADL20230000216C202500015
eFiling Date: 18-07-2025
First Hearing Date: 08th July 2026
Court Number And Judge: 790-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 06

    Orders

    2
    Interim Order 1Full order available
    08 Jul 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 39CC NI ACT/6571/2026 DLCT020335492025 KRISHAN VS. KAVITA SHARMA 08.07.2026 Fresh complaint case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Undersigned is working as Duty JMFC today. Present : Sh.Yogeshwar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the complainant (through VC). Submissions heard. Record perused. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision reported as A.C. Narayanan vs. State of Maharashtra (2014) 11 SCC 790 has held as under, “29. From a conjoint reading of…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1Full order available
    08 Jul 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 39CC NI ACT/6571/2026 DLCT020335492025 KRISHAN VS. KAVITA SHARMA 08.07.2026 Fresh complaint case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Undersigned is working as Duty JMFC today. Present : Sh.Yogeshwar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the complainant (through VC). Submissions heard. Record perused. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision reported as A.C. Narayanan vs. State of Maharashtra (2014) 11 SCC 790 has held as under, “29. From a conjoint reading of…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.