Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

Uttam SinghVsManjesh Rathee

CNR DLCT020335042026811-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS NI ACT - 09
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
10681/2026
Registration Date
29 Jul 2026
Next Hearing Date
08 Dec 2026
Case Stage
Consideration

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Uttam Singh

    Respondent

    1. 1Manjesh Rathee

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138 · 142

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Railway Sarai Rohilla
    FIR Number / Year
    000/0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 04-08-2026
Business: FP
Next Purpose: Consideration
Next Hearing Date: 08-12-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 33503/2026
Filing Date: 28-07-2026
eFiling Number: ADL20260005020C202600003
eFiling Date: 27-07-2026
First Hearing Date: 04th August 2026
Court Number And Judge: 811-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS NI ACT - 09

    Orders

    2
    Interim Order 1
    04 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: (Aradhana)
JMFC (NI Act) – 09, Central District
Tis Hazari Court, Delhi/04.08.2026
72 CC NI ACT / 10681/2026
UTTAM SINGH Vs. Manjesh Rathee
Proceedings conducted through hybrid mode.
04.08.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered.
Present: Sh. Yogesh Singh, Ld Proxy Counsel for the complainant.
At request of proxy counsel for complainant, matter is passed over for 12:30 pm.
At 12:44 pm
Present: Sh. Rajneesh Kumar, Ld Counsel for the complainant.
Matter is fixed for consideration.
Perusal of record shows that the cheque in question was returned dishonoured on
the ground ‘document too long’.
Let summons be issued to the bank officials concerned from YES Bank and
Punjab and Sindh Bank to clarify the return reason, on filing of PF within one month from
today, returnable for NDOH.
Bank witness from YES Bank shall also produce the bank account statement for
the account bearing no. 059199600000151 maintained in the name of accused for the period
from March 2026 to June 2026.
Let a copy of this order and copy of cheque in question alongwith return memo
be enclosed with the summons.
Put up on 08.12.2026.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    04 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: (Aradhana)
JMFC (NI Act) – 09, Central District
Tis Hazari Court, Delhi/04.08.2026
72 CC NI ACT / 10681/2026
UTTAM SINGH Vs. Manjesh Rathee
Proceedings conducted through hybrid mode.
04.08.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered.
Present: Sh. Yogesh Singh, Ld Proxy Counsel for the complainant.
At request of proxy counsel for complainant, matter is passed over for 12:30 pm.
At 12:44 pm
Present: Sh. Rajneesh Kumar, Ld Counsel for the complainant.
Matter is fixed for consideration.
Perusal of record shows that the cheque in question was returned dishonoured on
the ground ‘document too long’.
Let summons be issued to the bank officials concerned from YES Bank and
Punjab and Sindh Bank to clarify the return reason, on filing of PF within one month from
today, returnable for NDOH.
Bank witness from YES Bank shall also produce the bank account statement for
the account bearing no. 059199600000151 maintained in the name of accused for the period
from March 2026 to June 2026.
Let a copy of this order and copy of cheque in question alongwith return memo
be enclosed with the summons.
Put up on 08.12.2026.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.