Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 8

CNR DLCT02032819202528 Sept 2026
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 8 · 28 Sept 2026 · CNR DLCT020328192025

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 28 Ct. Cases / 1290/2025
MEENU Vs. AYUSH RAJ SINGH AND ORS
PS: Sadar Bazar
28.09.2026
ORDER ON APPLICATION U/s 175 (3) BNSS.
Present: Sh. Rajinder Kumar, Ld. APP for the State.
Sh. Kuldeep Kumar, Ld. LAC for the complainant along
with complainant.
1. Vide this order, I shall adjudicate upon the application U/s
175(3) BNSS filed by the applicant for the registration of FIR.
2. Arguments heard. File perused.
3. Briefly stated, it is the case of the complainant that on
13.04.2025 between 7:00 to 8:00 PM, the complainant along with his
brother had gone to Nala Road, Sadar Bazar, Delhi to buy vegetables.
That at that time, four boys came behind and touched here back and used
abusive language. When her brother tried to stop them, they did not
stop, instead started fighting with her brother. Public persons helped her
and her brother. That the complainant made a PCR call, and thereafter,
she along with brother and mother went to PS Sadar Bazar, Delhi. At the
PS, two police personnel verbally abused the complainant, her brother
and her mother, and also gave them beatings at the PS. That they were
restrained at the PS till 3:30 PM. That the police has delayed in
accepting the complaint of the complainant. That the police has
-- 1 of 3 --
registered an FIR bearing NO. 454/2025 against the brother of the
complainant. That the complainant has already made a complaint dated
15.04.2025 with the SHO PS: Sadar Bazar, and Senior Officers,
however, till date no FIR has been registered. Hence, the present
application U/s 156(3) Cr. P. C., praying that FIR be registered against
the respondents under the relevant sections 75/75/79/3(5) BNS.
4. ATR was called in this matter. As per ATR dated 04.09.2025
filed by W/SI Deepika, PS: Sadar Bazar, and 03.10.2025 filed by ASI
Pramod Babu (PG Cell), no cognizable offence is made out against the
respondents in the present case. It is further stated that the complaint of
the complainant is a counter blast against the FIR already registered
against the brother of the complainant upon the complaint of respondent
No.1. That the complainant got violent at the police station, and while
controlling him, W/Ct. Shivani sustained injuries. That the present
complaint is nothing but frustration of the complainant against the police
officials as they registered FIR against her brother.
5. Perusal of the complaint reveals that the complainant has
the particulars of the respondents. Further, respondent No.1 is also a
complainant in the FIR bearing No. 454/2025, PS: Sadar Bazar, Delhi
registered against the brother of the complainant. The entire facts
alleged are in the personal knowledge of the complainant. The
allegations made by the complainant can be proved only by her when
-- 2 of 3 --
given an opportunity to lead PSE. Entire evidence is within the reach of
the complainant. No field investigation is deemed necessary.
6. Application under Section 175(3) BNSS is accordingly
hereby dismissed. Complainant is, however, called upon to lead pre-
summoning evidence U/s 200 Cr.P.C..
7. List for recording of pre-summoning evidence on
12.03.2027.
(Kartik Taparia)
JMFC-06(C)/THC/Delhi/28.09.2026
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.