Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 20 CC NI ACT 11379/2025 M/s Ladlee Designer Vs. Vishal Gupta 21.02.2026 VC of this court is not working. Present: None for complainant. None for proposed accused proprietor. Notice u/s 223 BNSS issued to the proposed accused not received back. However, in terms of the guidelines passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in case titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 (SC) 952, decided on 25.09.2025, there is…
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act
M/S LADLEE DESIGNERVsVISHAL GUPTA
CNR DLCT020319432025508-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 01
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING
TrustJury record updated 15 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 11379/2025
- Registration Date
- 23 Jul 2025
- Next Hearing Date
- 02 Aug 2027
- Case Stage
- Misc./ Appearance
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 17-09-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 21-02-2026 Date: 21-02-2026 Business: fp Reason For Adjournment: Accused Absent Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2026 Date: 01-10-2026 Business: fp Reason For Adjournment: Accused Absent Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 02-08-2027
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 31943/2025 Filing Date: 17-07-2025 eFiling Number: ADL20230011432C202500038 eFiling Date: 08-07-2025 First Hearing Date: 17th September 2025 Court Number And Judge: 508-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 01
Orders
6Interim Order 301 Oct 2026
01 Oct 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 14 CC NI ACT 11379/2025 M/s Ladlee Designer Vs. Vishal Gupta 01.10.2026 Present: Sh. Hardik Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for complainant (through VC). None for accused proprietor. Original postal receipts and tracking report on summons filed on behalf of complainant with the report ‘item delivered’. Taken on record. None has appeared on behalf of accused despite deemed service. Let bailable warrants in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-, be issued against the accused proprietor, with one surety of like amount, through the SHO concerned, on filing of PF within 2 months, returnable on NDOH. Complainant is directed to supply the soft copy of complaint and documents to the accused well in time. Warrants should carry an endorsement that accused is at liberty to settle the matter and pay the amount to the complainant by reaching out the complainant on the no. 7859984398, in view of the judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in case titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 (SC) . Put up for appearance of accused/ framing of notice/ furnishing of surety/ further proceedings on 02.08.2027. (URVI GUPTA) J.M.F.C.-01(N.I.Act)/Central, THC/Delhi/01.10.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 2Full order available
21 Feb 2026
Interim Order 117 Sept 2025
17 Sept 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 44 CC NI ACT / 11379/2025 M/s Ladlee Designer Vs. Vishal Gupta 17.09.2025 Fresh case is received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: None for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Case file perused. Let notice as per section 223 BNSS, be issued to the proposed accused proprietor, on filing of PF within two months, through all modes, returnable on NDOH. Complainant is directed to file proof of service. Put up for arguments on summoning/consideration on 21.02.2026. (URVI GUPTA) J.M.F.C.-01(N.I.Act)/Central, THC/Delhi/17.09.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 301 Oct 2026
01 Oct 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 14 CC NI ACT 11379/2025 M/s Ladlee Designer Vs. Vishal Gupta 01.10.2026 Present: Sh. Hardik Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for complainant (through VC). None for accused proprietor. Original postal receipts and tracking report on summons filed on behalf of complainant with the report ‘item delivered’. Taken on record. None has appeared on behalf of accused despite deemed service. Let bailable warrants in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-, be issued against the accused proprietor, with one surety of like amount, through the SHO concerned, on filing of PF within 2 months, returnable on NDOH. Complainant is directed to supply the soft copy of complaint and documents to the accused well in time. Warrants should carry an endorsement that accused is at liberty to settle the matter and pay the amount to the complainant by reaching out the complainant on the no. 7859984398, in view of the judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in case titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 (SC) . Put up for appearance of accused/ framing of notice/ furnishing of surety/ further proceedings on 02.08.2027. (URVI GUPTA) J.M.F.C.-01(N.I.Act)/Central, THC/Delhi/01.10.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 2Full order available
21 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 20 CC NI ACT 11379/2025 M/s Ladlee Designer Vs. Vishal Gupta 21.02.2026 VC of this court is not working. Present: None for complainant. None for proposed accused proprietor. Notice u/s 223 BNSS issued to the proposed accused not received back. However, in terms of the guidelines passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in case titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 (SC) 952, decided on 25.09.2025, there is…
Order 117 Sept 2025
17 Sept 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 44 CC NI ACT / 11379/2025 M/s Ladlee Designer Vs. Vishal Gupta 17.09.2025 Fresh case is received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: None for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Case file perused. Let notice as per section 223 BNSS, be issued to the proposed accused proprietor, on filing of PF within two months, through all modes, returnable on NDOH. Complainant is directed to file proof of service. Put up for arguments on summoning/consideration on 21.02.2026. (URVI GUPTA) J.M.F.C.-01(N.I.Act)/Central, THC/Delhi/17.09.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
