Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

AMRIT LALVsRajeev Sharma

CNR DLCT020317072025508-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 01
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 15 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
11366/2025
Registration Date
21 Jul 2025
Next Hearing Date
07 Jul 2027
Case Stage
Misc./ Appearance

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1AMRIT LAL

    Respondent

    1. 1Rajeev Sharma

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Hauz Qazi
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 15-09-2025
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 19-02-2026
    
    Date: 19-02-2026
    Business: fp
    Reason For Adjournment: Accused Absent
    Next Purpose: Consideration
    Next Hearing Date: 24-09-2026
    
    Date: 24-09-2026
    Business: fp
    Reason For Adjournment: Lawyers on strike
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 07-07-2027

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 31707/2025
    Filing Date: 16-07-2025
    eFiling Number: LTN20230003190C202500131
    eFiling Date: 10-07-2025
    First Hearing Date: 15th September 2025
    Court Number And Judge: 508-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 01

    Orders

    6
    Interim Order 3Full order available
    24 Sept 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 37 CC NI ACT 11366/2025 AMRIT LAL Vs. RAJEEV SHARMA 24.09.2026 Today, lawyers are stated to be abstaining from work. Present: None for complainant. None for proposed accused. Matter is at the stage of consideration. On LDOH, clarifications were sought from the complainant about maintainability of present complaint as there are two separate drawers of two cheques in question. Perusal of the complaint and documents on record shows that cheques in question were…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 2Full order available
    19 Feb 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 25 CC NI ACT 11366/2025 AMRIT LAL Vs. RAJEEV SHARMA 19.02.2026 Present: Sh. Kabir Ahmed, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Proposed accused no. 1 Rajeev Sharma (signatory and drawer to 1st cheque) is absent. Proposed accused no. 2, Seema, (signatory and drawer to 2nd cheque) is absent. None for proposed accused. Complainant has filed tracking report along with postal receipts regarding delivery of notice u/s 223 BNSS. However, none has appeared on behalf of…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 1
    15 Sept 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 33 CC NI ACT 11366/2025
    AMRIT LAL Vs. RAJEEV SHARMA
    15.09.2025
    Fresh case is received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered.
    Present: Sh. Gaurav Bansal, Proxy Counsel for Complainant with complainant.
    Proposed accused no. 1 Rajeev is signatory to cheque no. 957410.
    Proposed accused no. 2 Seema is signatory to cheque no. 658259
    Matter is at the stage of consideration.
    Case file perused.
    Let notice as per section 223 BNSS, be issued to the proposed accused
    no. 1 Rajeev is signatory to cheque no. 957410 & proposed accused no. 2 Seema is
    signatory to cheque no. 658259, on filing of PF within two months, through all
    modes, returnable on NDOH.
    Complainant is directed to file proof of service.
    Complainant is directed to supply the soft copy of complaint and
    documents to the proposed accused well in time.
    Put up for arguments on summoning/consideration on 19.02.2026.
    (URVI GUPTA)
    J.M.F.C.-01(N.I.Act)/Central,
    THC/Delhi/15.09.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3Full order available
    24 Sept 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 37 CC NI ACT 11366/2025 AMRIT LAL Vs. RAJEEV SHARMA 24.09.2026 Today, lawyers are stated to be abstaining from work. Present: None for complainant. None for proposed accused. Matter is at the stage of consideration. On LDOH, clarifications were sought from the complainant about maintainability of present complaint as there are two separate drawers of two cheques in question. Perusal of the complaint and documents on record shows that cheques in question were…

    Read Full Order
    Order 2Full order available
    19 Feb 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 25 CC NI ACT 11366/2025 AMRIT LAL Vs. RAJEEV SHARMA 19.02.2026 Present: Sh. Kabir Ahmed, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Proposed accused no. 1 Rajeev Sharma (signatory and drawer to 1st cheque) is absent. Proposed accused no. 2, Seema, (signatory and drawer to 2nd cheque) is absent. None for proposed accused. Complainant has filed tracking report along with postal receipts regarding delivery of notice u/s 223 BNSS. However, none has appeared on behalf of…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1
    15 Sept 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 33 CC NI ACT 11366/2025
    AMRIT LAL Vs. RAJEEV SHARMA
    15.09.2025
    Fresh case is received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered.
    Present: Sh. Gaurav Bansal, Proxy Counsel for Complainant with complainant.
    Proposed accused no. 1 Rajeev is signatory to cheque no. 957410.
    Proposed accused no. 2 Seema is signatory to cheque no. 658259
    Matter is at the stage of consideration.
    Case file perused.
    Let notice as per section 223 BNSS, be issued to the proposed accused
    no. 1 Rajeev is signatory to cheque no. 957410 & proposed accused no. 2 Seema is
    signatory to cheque no. 658259, on filing of PF within two months, through all
    modes, returnable on NDOH.
    Complainant is directed to file proof of service.
    Complainant is directed to supply the soft copy of complaint and
    documents to the proposed accused well in time.
    Put up for arguments on summoning/consideration on 19.02.2026.
    (URVI GUPTA)
    J.M.F.C.-01(N.I.Act)/Central,
    THC/Delhi/15.09.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.