Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

MOHD FURQUANVsSIMRAN KUMARI

CNR DLCT020312252026511-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 02
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
10168/2026
Registration Date
21 Jul 2026
Next Hearing Date
13 Jan 2027
Case Stage
Misc./ Appearance

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1MOHD FURQUAN

    Respondent

    1. 1SIMRAN KUMARI

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Sadar Bazar
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 29-08-2026
Business: FP
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 13-01-2027

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 31224/2026
Filing Date: 16-07-2026
eFiling Number: ADL20230000426C202600011
eFiling Date: 13-07-2026
First Hearing Date: 29th August 2026
Court Number And Judge: 511-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 02

    Orders

    2
    Interim Order 1
    29 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 40 Cc NI ACT 10168/2026 Mohd Furquan Vs. Simran Kumari /0 (Sadar Bazar)
CNR No: DLCT020312252026
29.08.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules.
Present: Ld proxy counsel for the complainant.
This is a fresh case.
In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij Tari
v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to issue
summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage. Hence,
appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with.
Perusal of the record reveals that legal demand notice sent to the proposed accused
was returned to the sender.
Accordingly, complainant is directed to file affidavit of proof of service of the legal
demand notice to the proposed accused on or before NDOH in view of judgment ie. HDFC Vs.
Amit Kumar, AIR 2010(NOC) 407 (DEL.), 2010 of Hon’ble High Court.
Be put up on 13.01.2027.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)
Central/THC, Delhi
29.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    29 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 40 Cc NI ACT 10168/2026 Mohd Furquan Vs. Simran Kumari /0 (Sadar Bazar)
CNR No: DLCT020312252026
29.08.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules.
Present: Ld proxy counsel for the complainant.
This is a fresh case.
In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij Tari
v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to issue
summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage. Hence,
appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with.
Perusal of the record reveals that legal demand notice sent to the proposed accused
was returned to the sender.
Accordingly, complainant is directed to file affidavit of proof of service of the legal
demand notice to the proposed accused on or before NDOH in view of judgment ie. HDFC Vs.
Amit Kumar, AIR 2010(NOC) 407 (DEL.), 2010 of Hon’ble High Court.
Be put up on 13.01.2027.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)
Central/THC, Delhi
29.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.