Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 29 Cr. Case 9236/2025 STATE Vs. PAPPU YADAV FIR No. 167/2022 PS (Crime Branch-Central Delhi) 30.01.2026 Present. Sh. Amit Yadav, Ld. APP for the State. Proposed accused Ajay Kumar @ Aman (9718170962), Pappu Yadav (9233152029)and Gautam Mittal (9560282733) in person with counsel Sh. Nagendra Singh (undertakes to file the vakalatnama during the course of the day) (9999339334, e-mail id:advsupremecourt7267@gmail.com). Proposed accused Rohit Kumar, Sainath Sharma, Nagraju, Vikas Soni, Dhanraju, Neeraj Rana @ Prem…
STATEVsPAPPU YADAV +11 more
TrustJury record updated 15 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 9236/2025
- Registration Date
- 14 Jul 2025
- Next Hearing Date
- 08 Jan 2027
- Case Stage
- Misc./ Appearance
Advocates
0No advocate information is available in this record.
Parties
13Petitioner
Acts & Sections
1Police / FIR Details
- Police Station
- Crime Branch-Central Delhi
- FIR Number / Year
- 167/2022
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 15-09-2025 Business: purpose fixed Next Purpose: Consideration Next Hearing Date: 30-01-2026 Date: 30-01-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 15-04-2026 Date: 15-04-2026 Business: PE Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 05-09-2026 Date: 05-09-2026 Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 08-01-2027
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 31041/2025 Filing Date: 11-07-2025 eFiling Number: 817500122016701 eFiling Date: 11-07-2025 First Hearing Date: 15th September 2025 Court Number And Judge: 38-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Orders
8Interim Order 405 Sept 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 20 Cr. Case 9236/2025 STATE Vs. PAPPU YADAV FIR No. 167/2022 (Crime Branch-Central Delhi) 05.09.2026 Ld. CJM (Central) is on leave today. Present. Sh. Amit Yadav, Ld. APP for the State. Accused Pappu Yadav in person. Accused Gautam is absent. Accused Vikas Soni is absent. Ld. counsel for accused Vikas Soni via VC. Accused Rohit, is present with ld. counsel Sh. J. P. N Shahi and Ms. Musarrat (Fresh vakalatnama filed). Sh. R. B. Chaudhary, ld. counsel for accused Pappu, Ajay and Gautam. All accused persons are absent. Ms. Niharika, Ld. counsel for accused Vikas. Sh. Sandeep Pathak, Ld. counsel for accused Devinder Soni. Memo of appearance filed on behalf of accused Rahul. Same is taken on record. An exemption application has been moved on behalf of the accused Gautam. Heard. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the accused person is exempted from personal appearance for today. Be put up for further proceedings on 08.01.2027. (Mayank Gupta) Reliever Judge/(Central)/THC/Delhi For CJM(Central) 05.09.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 315 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 Cr. Case 9236/2025 STATE Vs. PAPPU YADAV 167/2022 (Crime Branch-Central Delhi) 15.04.2026 Present. Sh. Amit Yadav, Ld. APP for the State. Accused Ajay, Pappu Yadav, Gautam, Vikas Soni, & Rohit are present. Other accused are absent. Sh. R.B. Chaudhary (9818827737) & Sh. Nagender Singh, Ld. counsel for accused Ajay, Pappu & Gautam. Sh. Roshan, Ld. counsel for accused Vikas Soni.Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of accused. Same be taken on record (9999008043). None for accused Rohit. Accused Sai Nath Sharma, Nagraju, Dhanraju, Neeraj Rana, Pradeep, Devender Soni & Rahul Kishney are absent. IO/SI Sumit Kumar is present via VC. Soft copy of charge-sheet has been supplied to the accused Ajay, Pappu Yadav, Gautam, Vikas Soni, & Rohit on 13.04.2026. IO is directed to supply one copy on pendrive to the respective counsels namely Sh. R.B. Chaudhary & Sh. Roshan within 2 weeks. Issue fresh summons to the absentee accused namely Sai Nath Sharma, Nagraju, Dhanraju, Neeraj Rana, Pradeep, Devender Soni & Rahul Kishney through office of DCP concerned for 05.09.2026. (HARSHITA MISHRA) CJM/(Central)/THC/Delhi 15.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 115 Sept 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 25 Cr. Case 9236-2025 STATE Vs. PAPPU YADAV 167/2022 (Crime Branch-Central Delhi) 15.09.2025 Ld. CJM (Central) has been promoted to Delhi Higher Judicial Services Present. Sh. Vishal Gupta, Ld. Addl. PP for the State. Proposed accused Pappu Yadav, Ajay Kumar and Gautam Mittal are in person with Sh. R.B.Chaudhary, ld proxy counsel. Cognizance is yet to be taken. Let notice be issued to the I.O to remain present on the next date of hearing. Be put up for Consideration on 30.01.2026. (Rangat Ghirra) Reliever Judge/(Central)/THC/Delhi For CJM (Central) 15.09.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 405 Sept 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 20 Cr. Case 9236/2025 STATE Vs. PAPPU YADAV FIR No. 167/2022 (Crime Branch-Central Delhi) 05.09.2026 Ld. CJM (Central) is on leave today. Present. Sh. Amit Yadav, Ld. APP for the State. Accused Pappu Yadav in person. Accused Gautam is absent. Accused Vikas Soni is absent. Ld. counsel for accused Vikas Soni via VC. Accused Rohit, is present with ld. counsel Sh. J. P. N Shahi and Ms. Musarrat (Fresh vakalatnama filed). Sh. R. B. Chaudhary, ld. counsel for accused Pappu, Ajay and Gautam. All accused persons are absent. Ms. Niharika, Ld. counsel for accused Vikas. Sh. Sandeep Pathak, Ld. counsel for accused Devinder Soni. Memo of appearance filed on behalf of accused Rahul. Same is taken on record. An exemption application has been moved on behalf of the accused Gautam. Heard. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the accused person is exempted from personal appearance for today. Be put up for further proceedings on 08.01.2027. (Mayank Gupta) Reliever Judge/(Central)/THC/Delhi For CJM(Central) 05.09.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 315 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 Cr. Case 9236/2025 STATE Vs. PAPPU YADAV 167/2022 (Crime Branch-Central Delhi) 15.04.2026 Present. Sh. Amit Yadav, Ld. APP for the State. Accused Ajay, Pappu Yadav, Gautam, Vikas Soni, & Rohit are present. Other accused are absent. Sh. R.B. Chaudhary (9818827737) & Sh. Nagender Singh, Ld. counsel for accused Ajay, Pappu & Gautam. Sh. Roshan, Ld. counsel for accused Vikas Soni.Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of accused. Same be taken on record (9999008043). None for accused Rohit. Accused Sai Nath Sharma, Nagraju, Dhanraju, Neeraj Rana, Pradeep, Devender Soni & Rahul Kishney are absent. IO/SI Sumit Kumar is present via VC. Soft copy of charge-sheet has been supplied to the accused Ajay, Pappu Yadav, Gautam, Vikas Soni, & Rohit on 13.04.2026. IO is directed to supply one copy on pendrive to the respective counsels namely Sh. R.B. Chaudhary & Sh. Roshan within 2 weeks. Issue fresh summons to the absentee accused namely Sai Nath Sharma, Nagraju, Dhanraju, Neeraj Rana, Pradeep, Devender Soni & Rahul Kishney through office of DCP concerned for 05.09.2026. (HARSHITA MISHRA) CJM/(Central)/THC/Delhi 15.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 29 Cr. Case 9236/2025 STATE Vs. PAPPU YADAV FIR No. 167/2022 PS (Crime Branch-Central Delhi) 30.01.2026 Present. Sh. Amit Yadav, Ld. APP for the State. Proposed accused Ajay Kumar @ Aman (9718170962), Pappu Yadav (9233152029)and Gautam Mittal (9560282733) in person with counsel Sh. Nagendra Singh (undertakes to file the vakalatnama during the course of the day) (9999339334, e-mail id:advsupremecourt7267@gmail.com). Proposed accused Rohit Kumar, Sainath Sharma, Nagraju, Vikas Soni, Dhanraju, Neeraj Rana @ Prem…
Order 115 Sept 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 25 Cr. Case 9236-2025 STATE Vs. PAPPU YADAV 167/2022 (Crime Branch-Central Delhi) 15.09.2025 Ld. CJM (Central) has been promoted to Delhi Higher Judicial Services Present. Sh. Vishal Gupta, Ld. Addl. PP for the State. Proposed accused Pappu Yadav, Ajay Kumar and Gautam Mittal are in person with Sh. R.B.Chaudhary, ld proxy counsel. Cognizance is yet to be taken. Let notice be issued to the I.O to remain present on the next date of hearing. Be put up for Consideration on 30.01.2026. (Rangat Ghirra) Reliever Judge/(Central)/THC/Delhi For CJM (Central) 15.09.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
