Full Order Text
Order 3 · 21 Jan 2025 · CNR DLCT020304462024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CC NI ACT / 9779/2024 Balram Singh Vs. Amit Verma 21.01.2025 Regular stenographer is on leave today Present: Complainant is in person. None for proposed accused. Notice issued to the proposed accused received back with the remarks ‘refused’. However, tracking report has been filed by the Ld. Counsel for the complainant and as per the same, the notice has been served. The instant complaint has been filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Notice u/s 223 (proviso) BNSS was issued to the proposed accused on LDOH. Proposed accused has not entered appearance today despite service. It appears that the proposed accused does not wish to be heard on the point of cognizance. Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to proceed further without hearing the proposed accused as already sufficient opportunity has been given to him. Complaint, affidavit of evidence and other documents perused. Prima facie, complaint appears to have been filed within limitation period and falls within the territorial jurisdiction of this court. I hereby take cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 138 of NI Act qua the cheque in question. Following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in “A. C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr.” (2014) 11 SCC 790, complaint, affidavit of evidence and annexed documents considered. Inquiry under Section 202 Cr.P.C. conducted. In view of the same I am satisfied, there are sufficient grounds for proceeding further against accused person for offence punishable under Section 138 N. -- 1 of 2 -- I. Act qua the cheque in question. Accordingly, issue summons to accused through post/approved courier/other permissible modes on filing of PF & RC. PF & RC to be filed within 7 days from today. Ahlmad is directed to make the following endorsement on the summons in terms of the guidelines of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal 2010 5 SCC 663: (a) Accused can make an application for compounding of the offence at the first or second hearing of the case and if such an application is made, compounding may be allowed by the court without imposing any costs on the accused. (b) If the accused does not make an application for compounding as aforesaid, then if an application for compounding is made before the court at a subsequent stage, compounding can be allowed subject to the condition that the accused will be required to pay 10%of the cheque amount to be deposited as a condition for compounding with the District Legal Service Authority. Further, the process server is directed that in the event of non availability of the accused or house/office/premises is found to be locked or accused refuses to accept the service, process be served through affixation. Put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of bail/framing of notice on There is no requirement for issuing formal summons to proposed accused. List the matter for appearance of accused/ furnishing of bail bonds/ framing of notice on 24.04.2025. (Abhay Choudhary) Judicial Magistrate First Class-04, NI Act 21.01.2025 -- 2 of 2 --
