Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

VARUNVsRAHUL BHARTI

CNR DLCT020291682026810-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 08
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
9620/2026
Registration Date
09 Jul 2026
Next Hearing Date
04 Dec 2026
Case Stage
Conciliation

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1VARUN

    Respondent

    1. 1RAHUL BHARTI

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Rajinder Nagar
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 13-08-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Conciliation
Next Hearing Date: 04-12-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 29167/2026
Filing Date: 03-07-2026
eFiling Number: ADL20230004805C202600086
eFiling Date: 13-06-2026
First Hearing Date: 13th August 2026
Court Number And Judge: 810-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 08

    Orders

    2
    Interim Order 1
    13 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: (Garima Garg)
JMFC(NI Act)-08,
Central/ THC/ Delhi 13.08.2026
79 CC NI ACT / 9620/2026
Varun Vs. Rahul Bharti
13.08.2026
Present: Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
Fresh complaint received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as
per rules.
Original complaint alongwith documents has already been filed. The same has been
confirmed by the Reader of this court. Be taken on record.
Perusal of the record shows that there is no proof of service of legal demand
notice on the proposed accused.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant seeks time to move an appropriate affidavit
verifying that the accused is residing at the same address only, where the demand notice was
served in compliance of judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in case titled as HDFC Bank
Ltd. Vs. Amit Kumar Singh, 2009 and in mandate of judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in
CC. Alavi Haji V Palapetty Mohd. & Another 2007.
Allowed.
At request, put up again on 04/12/2026.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    13 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: (Garima Garg)
JMFC(NI Act)-08,
Central/ THC/ Delhi 13.08.2026
79 CC NI ACT / 9620/2026
Varun Vs. Rahul Bharti
13.08.2026
Present: Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
Fresh complaint received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as
per rules.
Original complaint alongwith documents has already been filed. The same has been
confirmed by the Reader of this court. Be taken on record.
Perusal of the record shows that there is no proof of service of legal demand
notice on the proposed accused.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant seeks time to move an appropriate affidavit
verifying that the accused is residing at the same address only, where the demand notice was
served in compliance of judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in case titled as HDFC Bank
Ltd. Vs. Amit Kumar Singh, 2009 and in mandate of judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in
CC. Alavi Haji V Palapetty Mohd. & Another 2007.
Allowed.
At request, put up again on 04/12/2026.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.