Order 10

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 39Cr. Case 12814/2023 State Vs. Rang Bahadur Saroj
EFIR No.000116/2023 Ps (Delhi Cantt. Railway Station)
07.09.2026
Present: Sh. Vinod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
Accused Rang Bahadur in person alongwith Ld. Counsel
Sh. Rajesh Vashisht.
Accused Sahadev is absent.
PW Mr. Mewa Singh in perosn.
Complainant submits that he is ready to settle the matter with the
accused without any compensation qua the offence u/s 411 IPC. Separate
statement of the complainant in this regard has been recorded.
Let Non Bailable Warrants be issued against the Accused Sahadev
in compliance of Standing Order No. LIC & LEG/16/2022 (regarding Execution
of Summons and Warrants) on filing of PF through concerned DCP, returnable on
the NDOH. DCP to ensure that:
(i) In case Accused is not available at the house or the house is locked, Process
Server must make at least 3 attempts to serve the process.
(ii) A copy of the summon/Warrant shall be affixed at a conspicuous part of the
house and the same shall be photographed.
(ii) Statement of at least 2 independent witnesses to be recorded and annexed
along with the NBW report. Process server shall annexed the ID documents of
the independent witness alongwith the report filed.
(iv) Corresponding DD entry shall be annexed along with the report of NBW,
showing arrival and departure for each time the process server goes to execute
the process.
(v) Reasons for non-service shall be mentioned clearly and in detail in legible
handwriting.
(vi) Date and time shall be clearly mentioned in the NBW report along with
details of process server viz. rank/number/ps.
Ahlmad is directed to attach copy of the present order along with
the NBW.
The process server is also directed to appear alongwith the report on NDOH.
Be put up on 05.10.2026.
At this stage, an application for release of mobile phone on
Superdari to applicant. Heard. Perused.
Contd…...
-- 1 of 2 --
Report was filed by the IO and it is reported that the above said
mobile phone is not required for the purpose of investigation and no useful pur-
pose is to be served to keep the same in malkhana.
In view of the report of the IO, the above said mobile phone be
released to its rightful owner, as per guidelines of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi
passed in case titled as Manjeet Singh Vs State in misc. application 16055/2013
on furnishing indemnity bond/security bond of appropriate value to the satisfac-
tion of IO/SHO concerned with the following conditions :-
1. That the rightful owner shall join the investigation as and when directed to do
so;
2. That the rightful owner shall furnish the indemnity bond/security bond to the
IO/SHO concerned;
3. That the rightful owner shall also undertake to intimate the Court any address
which he may change during the course of time.
The SHO is also directed to take the necessary photographs duly
authenticated and certified and a detailed punchnama be also prepared before
such release of above mentioned mobile phone. The necessary photographs be
taken at the cost of rightful owner.
The SHO is further directed to obtain the signature/endorsement of
the rightful owner of the photographs of above said mobile phone.
It is also directed that the SHO shall keep on record the permanent
address of the rightful owner, his identity proof, his address proof as well as his
phone number.
All these documents shall be filed by the SHO along with the final
report as and when the same is filed.
Application moved by the applicant stands disposed off accord-
ingly. Copy dasti.
(Vaibhav Garg)
JMFC-11/Central/THC/07.09.2026
-- 2 of 2 --