Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 56 CC NI Act No. 11034/2025 GEETA Vs. MOHD FAZIL 27.11.2025 Present: Sh. Bhanu Sanwariya, Ld. Counsel for complainant alongwith complainant (through VC). None for accused. In terms of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in ‘Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr.’, pronounced on 25.09.2025, in Criminal Appeal No.1755/2010, requirement for issuing notice u/s 223 BNSS to proposed accused stands dispensed with. Pre-summoning Evidence by way of affidavit has…
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act
GEETAVsMOHD FAZIL
CNR DLCT020270972025789-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 05
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING
TrustJury record updated 15 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 11034/2025
- Registration Date
- 09 Jul 2025
- Next Hearing Date
- 03 Nov 2026
- Case Stage
- Misc./ Appearance
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138
Police / FIR Details
- Police Station
- Railway Sarai Rohilla
- FIR Number / Year
- 0
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 22-08-2025 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 27-11-2025 Date: 27-11-2025 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 25-03-2026 Date: 25-03-2026 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 05-08-2026 Date: 05-08-2026 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 03-11-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 27097/2025 Filing Date: 10-06-2025 eFiling Number: ADL20230016704C202500020 eFiling Date: 08-06-2025 First Hearing Date: 22nd August 2025 Court Number And Judge: 789-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 05
Orders
8Interim Order 405 Aug 2026
05 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 28 CC NI ACT / 11034/2025 GEETA Vs. MOHD FAZIL /0 (Railway Sarai Rohilla) 05.08.2026 Present: Sh. Bhanu, Ld. Counsel for complainant along with complainant. Summons issued to the accused not received back. Issue fresh summons to the accused through all modes including e-mode on filing of PF/RC/Speed Post within two weeks returnable on 03.11.2026. (ARJUN KIRAR) JMFC (NI Act)- 05/ Central District THC/Delhi/05.08.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 325 Mar 2026
25 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 28 CC NI ACT / 11034/2025 GEETA Vs. MOHD FAZIL /0 (Railway Sarai Rohilla) 25.03.2026 Present: Sh. Bhanu Sawariya, Ld. Counsel for complainant (through VC). Summons could not be issued as steps not taken by the complainant. Issue fresh summons to the accused through all modes including e-mode on filing of PF/RC/Speed Post within two weeks returnable on 05.08.2026. (ARJUN KIRAR) JMFC (NI Act)- 05/ Central District THC/Delhi/25.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 2Full order available
27 Nov 2025
Interim Order 122 Aug 2025
22 Aug 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 45 CC NI ACT No. 11034/2025 PS RAILWAY SARAI ROHILLA GEETA Vs. MOHD FAZIL 22.08.2025 Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present: None for complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration on present complaint. Advocates are on strike today. No adverse order is being passed today. As per section 223 BNSS, proposed accused is required to be heard prior to taking cognizance. Accordingly, let notice be issued to proposed accused for NDOH. Steps for filing PF, RC, speed post and electronic mode be taken within two weeks from today. Put up for purpose fixed on 27.11.2025. (ARUSHI PARWAL) JMFC (NI Act) – 05/ Central District THC/Delhi/22.08.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 405 Aug 2026
05 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 28 CC NI ACT / 11034/2025 GEETA Vs. MOHD FAZIL /0 (Railway Sarai Rohilla) 05.08.2026 Present: Sh. Bhanu, Ld. Counsel for complainant along with complainant. Summons issued to the accused not received back. Issue fresh summons to the accused through all modes including e-mode on filing of PF/RC/Speed Post within two weeks returnable on 03.11.2026. (ARJUN KIRAR) JMFC (NI Act)- 05/ Central District THC/Delhi/05.08.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 325 Mar 2026
25 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 28 CC NI ACT / 11034/2025 GEETA Vs. MOHD FAZIL /0 (Railway Sarai Rohilla) 25.03.2026 Present: Sh. Bhanu Sawariya, Ld. Counsel for complainant (through VC). Summons could not be issued as steps not taken by the complainant. Issue fresh summons to the accused through all modes including e-mode on filing of PF/RC/Speed Post within two weeks returnable on 05.08.2026. (ARJUN KIRAR) JMFC (NI Act)- 05/ Central District THC/Delhi/25.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 2Full order available
27 Nov 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 56 CC NI Act No. 11034/2025 GEETA Vs. MOHD FAZIL 27.11.2025 Present: Sh. Bhanu Sanwariya, Ld. Counsel for complainant alongwith complainant (through VC). None for accused. In terms of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in ‘Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr.’, pronounced on 25.09.2025, in Criminal Appeal No.1755/2010, requirement for issuing notice u/s 223 BNSS to proposed accused stands dispensed with. Pre-summoning Evidence by way of affidavit has…
Order 122 Aug 2025
22 Aug 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 45 CC NI ACT No. 11034/2025 PS RAILWAY SARAI ROHILLA GEETA Vs. MOHD FAZIL 22.08.2025 Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present: None for complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration on present complaint. Advocates are on strike today. No adverse order is being passed today. As per section 223 BNSS, proposed accused is required to be heard prior to taking cognizance. Accordingly, let notice be issued to proposed accused for NDOH. Steps for filing PF, RC, speed post and electronic mode be taken within two weeks from today. Put up for purpose fixed on 27.11.2025. (ARUSHI PARWAL) JMFC (NI Act) – 05/ Central District THC/Delhi/22.08.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
