Full Order Text
Order 3 · 16 Dec 2025 · CNR DLCT020269992025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 99 CC NI ACT / 10305/2025 MANOJ KUMAR Vs. AMAJD BEG /0 (Karol Bagh) 16.12.2025 Present: Ld counsel for the complainant. None for proposed accused. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Court notice issued to proposed accused not received back. In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage. Hence, appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with. Perusal of the record reveals that legal demand notice sent to the proposed accused returned to the sender. However, Ld. Counsel for complainant submits that the same has been sent at the last known address of the proposed accused. Further, the same was also sent through Whatsapp. Accordingly, complainant is directed to file affidavit of proof of service of the legal demand notice to the proposed accused on or before NDOH in view of judgment ie. HDFC Vs. Amit Kumar, AIR 2010(NOC) 407 (DEL.), 2010 of Hon’ble High Court. Be put up on 27.03.2026. (Navdeep Gupta) JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central THC/Delhi/16.12.2025 -- 1 of 1 --