Skip to main content
Ct. Cases - COMPLAINT CASES

PUNIT CHOUDHARYVsMANOJ JUNEJAR

CNR DLCT02026658202538-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 15 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
1138/2025
Registration Date
08 Jul 2025
Next Hearing Date
02 Dec 2026
Case Stage
Misc./ Appearance

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1PUNIT CHOUDHARY

    Respondent

    1. 1MANOJ JUNEJAR

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita · Sec 175(3)

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 08-07-2025
    Business: FP
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 14-10-2025
    
    Date: 14-10-2025
    Business: purpose fixed
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 07-01-2026
    
    Date: 07-01-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 08-04-2026
    
    Date: 08-04-2026
    Business: FP
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 31-07-2026
    
    Date: 31-07-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 02-12-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 26658/2025
    Filing Date: 06-06-2025
    eFiling Number: ADL20230002706C202500016
    eFiling Date: 04-06-2025
    First Hearing Date: 08th July 2025
    Court Number And Judge: 38-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

    Orders

    8
    Interim Order 4
    31 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 14 Ct. Cases / 1138/2025
    PUNIT CHOUDHARY Vs. MANOJ JUNEJAR
    31.07.2026
    Present : Complainant is absent.
    Ms. Shilpa, Ld. Proxy counsel for complainant via VC.
    The report of Inquiry Officer SI Rahul Garg is on record.
    As per the same, the complainant had been contacted by him for
    inquiry in the matter. However, the complainant had not responded
    and when the Inquiry Officer visited his address, the complainant was
    not found present. The complainant has not furnished any
    documentary/electronic evidence to the Inquiry Officer to substantiate
    the allegations as leveled in the application u/s 175(3) BNSS. It is also
    noted that neither the complainant nor the main counsel in the matter
    are appearing regularly. Mostly, the proxy counsel is appearing to seek
    adjournments.
    Last and final opportunity is given to the Ld. Counsel for
    the complainant to argue on the application u/s 175(3) BNSS, failing
    which the same shall be dismissed for non-prosecution.
    List the matter now on 02.12.2026.
    (HARSHITA MISHRA)
    CJM/(Central)/THC/Delhi
    31.07.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    08 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 14
    Ct. Cases No. 1138/2025
    PUNIT CHOUDHARY Vs. MANOJ JUNEJAR
    08.04.2026
    Present. Ld. Proxy counsel for the complainant.
    Enquiry Officer is absent.
    Reply of SI Rahul Garg has been received. Same be taken
    on record. Copy supplied to the Ld. proxy counsel for the
    complainant.
    SI Rahul Garg to remain present on the NDOH.
    Be put up for further proceedings on 31.07.2026.
    (HARSHITA MISHRA)
    CJM/(Central)/THC/Delhi
    08.04.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    07 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 14
    Ct. Cases / 1138/2025
    PUNIT CHOUDHARY Vs. MANOJ JUNEJAR
    07.01.2026
    Present. Ms. Geetika, Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
    Enquiry Officer SI Arti Jha is absent despite service.
    Counsel for the complainant has filed an affidavit in
    support of her application u/s 175(3) BNSS. Same is taken on record.
    ATR dated 14.10.2025, filed by SI Arti Jha has been perused and the
    same is found to be perfunctory and superficial in nature. The ATR
    nowhere reveals as to how SI Arti Jha arrived at the conclusion that
    the dispute was civil in nature, when there are categorical allegations
    of vandalism of the library in question. Nothing has been placed on
    record to show that the dispute was only a tenant landlord dispute and
    pertained only to non payment of rent. Enquiry Officer to file an
    updated/fresh report on the next date. SHO to personally monitor the
    Enquiry in the present matter. Copy of this order be sent to the
    EO/SHO for information and compliance.
    Now to come up on 09.04.2026.
    NDOH: 08.04.2026
    Purpose: Filing of fresh ATR.
    (HARSHITA MISHRA)
    CJM/(Central)/THC/Delhi
    07.01.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    14 Oct 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 16 Ct. Cases / 1138/2025
    PUNIT CHOUDHARY Vs. MANOJ JUNEJAR
    14.10.2025
    Ld. CJM (Central) has been promoted to Delhi Higher Judicial
    Services.
    Present. None for complainant.
    ATR filed. Taken on record. Copy retained on record for
    the complainant.
    Perusal of the complaint shows that allegedly the
    complainant had made a complaint with respect to trespass on his
    property and criminal intimidation. ATR has been filed stating that the
    matter is civil in nature.
    Let notice be issued to the EO to remain present on the
    NDOH.
    Be put up for consideration on ATR/further proceedings
    on 07.01.2026.
    (Rangat Ghirra)
    Reliever Judge/(Central)/THC/Delhi
    For CJM (Central)
    14.10.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4
    31 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 14 Ct. Cases / 1138/2025
    PUNIT CHOUDHARY Vs. MANOJ JUNEJAR
    31.07.2026
    Present : Complainant is absent.
    Ms. Shilpa, Ld. Proxy counsel for complainant via VC.
    The report of Inquiry Officer SI Rahul Garg is on record.
    As per the same, the complainant had been contacted by him for
    inquiry in the matter. However, the complainant had not responded
    and when the Inquiry Officer visited his address, the complainant was
    not found present. The complainant has not furnished any
    documentary/electronic evidence to the Inquiry Officer to substantiate
    the allegations as leveled in the application u/s 175(3) BNSS. It is also
    noted that neither the complainant nor the main counsel in the matter
    are appearing regularly. Mostly, the proxy counsel is appearing to seek
    adjournments.
    Last and final opportunity is given to the Ld. Counsel for
    the complainant to argue on the application u/s 175(3) BNSS, failing
    which the same shall be dismissed for non-prosecution.
    List the matter now on 02.12.2026.
    (HARSHITA MISHRA)
    CJM/(Central)/THC/Delhi
    31.07.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    08 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 14
    Ct. Cases No. 1138/2025
    PUNIT CHOUDHARY Vs. MANOJ JUNEJAR
    08.04.2026
    Present. Ld. Proxy counsel for the complainant.
    Enquiry Officer is absent.
    Reply of SI Rahul Garg has been received. Same be taken
    on record. Copy supplied to the Ld. proxy counsel for the
    complainant.
    SI Rahul Garg to remain present on the NDOH.
    Be put up for further proceedings on 31.07.2026.
    (HARSHITA MISHRA)
    CJM/(Central)/THC/Delhi
    08.04.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    07 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 14
    Ct. Cases / 1138/2025
    PUNIT CHOUDHARY Vs. MANOJ JUNEJAR
    07.01.2026
    Present. Ms. Geetika, Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
    Enquiry Officer SI Arti Jha is absent despite service.
    Counsel for the complainant has filed an affidavit in
    support of her application u/s 175(3) BNSS. Same is taken on record.
    ATR dated 14.10.2025, filed by SI Arti Jha has been perused and the
    same is found to be perfunctory and superficial in nature. The ATR
    nowhere reveals as to how SI Arti Jha arrived at the conclusion that
    the dispute was civil in nature, when there are categorical allegations
    of vandalism of the library in question. Nothing has been placed on
    record to show that the dispute was only a tenant landlord dispute and
    pertained only to non payment of rent. Enquiry Officer to file an
    updated/fresh report on the next date. SHO to personally monitor the
    Enquiry in the present matter. Copy of this order be sent to the
    EO/SHO for information and compliance.
    Now to come up on 09.04.2026.
    NDOH: 08.04.2026
    Purpose: Filing of fresh ATR.
    (HARSHITA MISHRA)
    CJM/(Central)/THC/Delhi
    07.01.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    14 Oct 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 16 Ct. Cases / 1138/2025
    PUNIT CHOUDHARY Vs. MANOJ JUNEJAR
    14.10.2025
    Ld. CJM (Central) has been promoted to Delhi Higher Judicial
    Services.
    Present. None for complainant.
    ATR filed. Taken on record. Copy retained on record for
    the complainant.
    Perusal of the complaint shows that allegedly the
    complainant had made a complaint with respect to trespass on his
    property and criminal intimidation. ATR has been filed stating that the
    matter is civil in nature.
    Let notice be issued to the EO to remain present on the
    NDOH.
    Be put up for consideration on ATR/further proceedings
    on 07.01.2026.
    (Rangat Ghirra)
    Reliever Judge/(Central)/THC/Delhi
    For CJM (Central)
    14.10.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.