Order 10

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14CC NI ACT/8531/2024
CNR NO.:-DLCT020261102024
Ankush Jain Vs. Shubham Goswami
11.02.2026
Present : Sh.Nikhil Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
Sh.Vivek Jha, Ld. Counsel for the accused through VC
with accused.
At request of Ld. counsel for accused, put up at 11:30
a.m.
(Ravisha Sidana)
JMFC, NI Act-06,
Central District, THC
11.02.2026
At 11:52 p.m.
Present : Sh.Nikhil Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
Sh.Vivek Jha, Ld. proxy Counsel for the accused with
accused.
Vide order of the same day, application filed under
Section 268 BNSS on behalf of accused stands dismissed.
Notice u/s 251 Cr. P.C. framed against the accused for
the offence u/s 138 NI Act to which he has pleaded not guilty and
claimed trial.
Admission/ denial of documents done u/s 294 Cr.
P.C.In view of the admission of the accused of his signature on the
cheque, bank return memo and the address appearing on the legal
demand notice, witnesses cited in list of witnesses by complainant at
serial no. 2 and 4 stand dropped from said list.
Contd….
-- 1 of 2 --
Page-2
Considering the defense taken by accused as triable
issues have been raised and it is essential that the version of
complainant is subjected to the rigorous of the cross-examination
for eliciting the truth, therefore, accused is granted opportunity to
cross-examine the complainant u/s 145(2) NI Act.
Further, this Court does not deem it desirable /
appropriate to try the case summarily since sentence for
imprisonment exceeding one year may have to be passed if trial
results in conviction.
Hence, this case would be tried as summons trial case.
List the matter for CE on 15.04.2026.
(Ravisha Sidana)
JMFC, NI Act-06,
Central District, THC
11.02.2026
-- 2 of 2 --