Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

RACHNA SAGAR PVT LTDVsNEERU JAIN

CNR DLCT020257702026790-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 06
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
8596/2026
Registration Date
01 Jun 2026
Next Hearing Date
16 Nov 2026
Case Stage
Misc./ Appearance

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1RACHNA SAGAR PVT LTD

    Respondent

    1. 1NEERU JAIN

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Karol Bagh
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 27-07-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 16-11-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 25769/2026
Filing Date: 29-05-2026
eFiling Number: ADL20230015678C202600001
eFiling Date: 25-05-2026
First Hearing Date: 27th July 2026
Court Number And Judge: 790-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 06

    Orders

    2
    Interim Order 1Full order available
    27 Jul 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 73CC NI ACT/8596/2026 DLCT020257702026 Rachna Sagar Pvt Ltd Vs. Neeru Jain 27.07.2026 Fresh complaint case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present : Sh.Naman, Ld. Counsel for the complainant (through VC). Submissions heard. Record perused. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision reported as A.C. Narayanan vs. State of Maharashtra (2014) 11 SCC 790 has held as under, “29. From a conjoint reading of Sections 138, 142 and 145…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1Full order available
    27 Jul 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 73CC NI ACT/8596/2026 DLCT020257702026 Rachna Sagar Pvt Ltd Vs. Neeru Jain 27.07.2026 Fresh complaint case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present : Sh.Naman, Ld. Counsel for the complainant (through VC). Submissions heard. Record perused. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision reported as A.C. Narayanan vs. State of Maharashtra (2014) 11 SCC 790 has held as under, “29. From a conjoint reading of Sections 138, 142 and 145…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.