Interim Order 7

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 39 CC NI ACT 7942/2024
Shriram Finance Limited Vs. Dinesh Kumar
03.08.2026
Present: Sh. Sanat, AR of complainant in person.
Sh. Rakesh Upadhyay and Sh. Aditya Kaushik, Ld. Counsels for
complainant.
None for accused.
Matter is at the stage of CE.
An application has been filed for substitution of AR by the
complainant. Same is taken on record. Application being formal in nature is
allowed and accordingly Mr. Sanat stands substituted as AR of the complainant.
Ld. Counsel for complainant seeks time to file fresh evidence affidavit.
Copy be sent to opposite side atleast 7 days prior to NDOH on the order dated
19.03.2026.
Ld. Counsel for complainant submits that accused has failed to make
the payment for the amount in question. Accordingly, the matter is being proceeded
on merits.
Surety bonds of Rs. 25,000/- have not been furnished despite
directions. Today also, he has failed to appear. Accordingly, a cost Rs. 1,000/- is
imposed on the accused side to be paid to NGO on the UPI id:
earthlingstrust99.rzp@icici. Receipt of same be filed by NDOH.
PAYMENT OF COST IS PRE REQUISITE.
Accordingly, let bailable warrants in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-, be issued
against the accused, with one surety of like amount, through the SHO concerned, on
filing of PF within two months, returnable on NDOH.
Warrants should carry an endorsement that accused is at liberty to
settle the matter and pay the amount to the complainant by reaching out the
complainant on the no. 7895348627, in view of the judgment passed by Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India, in case titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr.,
2025 (SC)
.
Put up for filing of fresh evidence affidavit/ CE/ furnishing of surety of
Rs. 25,000/- on 24.05.2027.
(URVI GUPTA)
J.M.F.C.-01(N.I.Act)/Central,
THC/Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --