Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 1

CNR DLCT02024203202504 Jun 2025
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 1 · 04 Jun 2025 · CNR DLCT020242032025

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr. Case 7212/2025
STATE Vs. MD SHADAB
FIR No. 127/2025
PS Darya Ganj
04.06.2025
Proceedings are being conducted through hybrid mode.
Present: Mr. Manish Bansal, Ld. APP for State.
Accused is produced from JC (bail granted but bail bonds
not furnished).
Sh. Darshnik Narang, Ld. Assistant LADC for
accused from the office of LADC.
At this stage, Ld. LADC requested to release the accused
on personal bond. Ld. LADC for the accused however submits that
despite efforts, the accused is unable to furnish surety being poor /
indigent.
On perusal of the case file, it is observed that the accused
was granted bail vide order dated 22.05.2025 on furnishing of
personal bond in the sum of Rs.5,000/- with a surety of the like
amount.
Heard submissions.
Accordingly in the facts and circumstances of the case,
read with the guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in
Ajay Verma vs Government of NCT of Delhi WP (C) 10689/17 Dated
18.03.2018, the present application is favourably considered and
stands allowed. The accused be released from JC on furnishing
personal bond of Rs.5,000/- to the satisfaction of concerned Jail
Superintendent. Copy of this order be sent to the concerned Jail
Superintendent through Jail Dak today only.
With consent, arguments heard on the point of charge.
Record perused.
After carefully perusing the chargesheet, documents filed
therewith, including statements u/s 161 Cr.P.C recorded by IO and
hearing submissions of Ld. APP for the state and Ld. LADC for
accused, this Court is of the considered view that prima facie offence
-- 1 of 2 --
u/s 303(2) BNS and in alternative offence u/s 317(2) BNS are made
out against the accused. Accordingly, charge for the aforesaid
offences has been framed against the accused, to which accused
pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.
At this stage, accused admitted the genuineness of some
documents vide his separate statement recorded u/s 294 Cr.P.C./330
BNSS.
Ld. APP for State requested to drop witness at Sr. No. 4 to
6 in the list of prosecution witness in view of statement of accused u/s
294 Cr.P.C./330 BNSS.
Heard. At request of Ld. APP, witnesses at Sr. No. 4 to 6 in
the list of prosecution witness is dropped.
Put up for PE on 13.10.2025.
Let witness at Sr. No. 1 be summoned for NDOH.
The order be uploaded as per rules.
(Dr. Raj Kumar Singh)
Judicial Magistrate First Class-05/Central
Delhi/04.06.2025
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.