Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

ZIAUDDIN QURESHIVsFAISAL

CNR DLCT020237672026511-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 02
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
8135/2026
Registration Date
18 May 2026
Next Hearing Date
19 Dec 2026
Case Stage
Misc./ Appearance

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1ZIAUDDIN QURESHI

    Respondent

    1. 1FAISAL

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Darya Ganj
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 25-06-2026
    Business: FP
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 04-08-2026
    
    Date: 04-08-2026
    Business: FP
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 19-12-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 23767/2026
    Filing Date: 14-05-2026
    eFiling Number: ADL20230016743C202600005
    eFiling Date: 12-05-2026
    First Hearing Date: 25th June 2026
    Court Number And Judge: 511-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 02

    Orders

    4
    Interim Order 2
    04 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 31 CC NI ACT / 8135/2026 Ziauddin Qureshi Vs. Faisal /0 (Darya Ganj)
    DLCT020237672026
    04.08.2026
    Present: Ld counsel for the complainant.
    Matter is at the stage of consideration.
    Affidavit has been filed in terms of last order. Perused.
    Perusal of the record shows that application for condonation of delay has been
    annexed with the case file.
    Submissions heard. Record perused.
    Let notice of aforesaid application be issued to the proposed accused on filing of
    PF/RC/AD for the NDOH. Service be also affected dasti as well as on the email, WhatsApp
    message(s) and text message of proposed accused person(s), as provided by the complainant and
    further subject to filing of affidavit of service. PF be filed within one month.
    Be put up for further proceedings on 19.12.2026.
    (Navdeep Gupta)
    JMFC/NI Act-02
    Central/THC/Delhi, Delhi
    04.08.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    25 Jun 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 17 CC NI ACT / 8135/2026 Ziauddin Qureshi Vs. Faisal /0 (Darya Ganj)
    25.06.2026
    Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per
    rules.
    Present: Ld counsel for the complainant.
    This is a fresh case.
    In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij
    Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to
    issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage.
    Hence, appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with.
    Perusal of the record reveals that status of service of legal demand notice sent to
    the proposed accused is not clear from the tracking report annexed with the complaint case.
    Accordingly, complainant is directed to file affidavit of proof of service of the
    legal demand notice to the proposed accused on or before NDOH in view of judgment ie. HDFC
    Vs. Amit Kumar, AIR 2010(NOC) 407 (DEL.), 2010 of Hon’ble High Court.
    Be put up on 04.08.2026.
    (Navdeep Gupta)
    JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
    THC/Delhi/25.06.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    04 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 31 CC NI ACT / 8135/2026 Ziauddin Qureshi Vs. Faisal /0 (Darya Ganj)
    DLCT020237672026
    04.08.2026
    Present: Ld counsel for the complainant.
    Matter is at the stage of consideration.
    Affidavit has been filed in terms of last order. Perused.
    Perusal of the record shows that application for condonation of delay has been
    annexed with the case file.
    Submissions heard. Record perused.
    Let notice of aforesaid application be issued to the proposed accused on filing of
    PF/RC/AD for the NDOH. Service be also affected dasti as well as on the email, WhatsApp
    message(s) and text message of proposed accused person(s), as provided by the complainant and
    further subject to filing of affidavit of service. PF be filed within one month.
    Be put up for further proceedings on 19.12.2026.
    (Navdeep Gupta)
    JMFC/NI Act-02
    Central/THC/Delhi, Delhi
    04.08.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    25 Jun 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 17 CC NI ACT / 8135/2026 Ziauddin Qureshi Vs. Faisal /0 (Darya Ganj)
    25.06.2026
    Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per
    rules.
    Present: Ld counsel for the complainant.
    This is a fresh case.
    In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij
    Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to
    issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage.
    Hence, appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with.
    Perusal of the record reveals that status of service of legal demand notice sent to
    the proposed accused is not clear from the tracking report annexed with the complaint case.
    Accordingly, complainant is directed to file affidavit of proof of service of the
    legal demand notice to the proposed accused on or before NDOH in view of judgment ie. HDFC
    Vs. Amit Kumar, AIR 2010(NOC) 407 (DEL.), 2010 of Hon’ble High Court.
    Be put up on 04.08.2026.
    (Navdeep Gupta)
    JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
    THC/Delhi/25.06.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.