Skip to main content
Ct. Cases - COMPLAINT CASES

BANARSIDAS CHANDIWALA SEWA SMARAK TRUST SOCIETYVsMOHD TASLEEM

CNR DLCT020234292026806-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS - 13
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
924/2026
Registration Date
12 May 2026
Next Hearing Date
18 Nov 2026
Case Stage
Misc./ Appearance

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Cr. P.C. · Sec 156(3)

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Jama Masjid
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 19-05-2026
    Business: FP
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 25-08-2026
    
    Date: 25-08-2026
    Business: FP
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 18-11-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 23429/2026
    Filing Date: 12-05-2026
    eFiling Number: ADL20230004683C202600003
    eFiling Date: 08-05-2026
    First Hearing Date: 19th May 2026
    Court Number And Judge: 806-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS - 13

    Orders

    4
    Interim Order 2
    25 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 6 Ct. Cases / 924/2026
    BANARSIDAS CHANDIWALA SEWA
    SMARAK TRUST SOCIETY Vs. MOHD TASLEEM
    (Jama Masjid)
    25.08.2026
    Present: Sh. Anuj Malhotra Ld. Counsel for the complainant
    through VC.
    AR of the Complainant in person.
    ATR filed. Copy supplied.
    Re-list the matter for arguments application u/s 156(3)
    CrPC on 18.11.2026.
    (Ms. Rashi Raheja)
    JMFC-13, Central/THC
    Delhi/25.08.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    19 May 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 6 Ct. Cases 924/2026
    BANARSIDAS CHANDIWALA SEWA SMARAK TRUST
    SOCIETY
    Vs.
    MOHD TASLEEM
    PS Jama Masjid
    19.05.2026
    Present: Sh. Anup Malhotra Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
    Complainant in person.
    Heard. Perused.
    Let ATR be called from concerned SHO for
    explaining the following points specifically.
    1. Whether compliant was received in police station?
    2. Whether complaint was received in the office of DCP?
    3. Whether the complaint discloses commission of cognizable
    offence and whether any action has been taken by the police
    on the complaint?
    4. Whether there is any delay in the filing of complaint?
    5. Whether, if no cognizable offence has been made out, the
    complainant has been informed accordingly or not?
    Copy of the complaint alongwith Annexure be supplied
    to the Naib Court concerned today itself.
    Reply shall be filed in point wise manner addressing
    each query of the Court as raised above.
    Re-list the matter on 25.08.2026.
    (Ms. Rashi Raheja)
    JMFC-13, Central/THC
    Delhi/19.05.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    25 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 6 Ct. Cases / 924/2026
    BANARSIDAS CHANDIWALA SEWA
    SMARAK TRUST SOCIETY Vs. MOHD TASLEEM
    (Jama Masjid)
    25.08.2026
    Present: Sh. Anuj Malhotra Ld. Counsel for the complainant
    through VC.
    AR of the Complainant in person.
    ATR filed. Copy supplied.
    Re-list the matter for arguments application u/s 156(3)
    CrPC on 18.11.2026.
    (Ms. Rashi Raheja)
    JMFC-13, Central/THC
    Delhi/25.08.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    19 May 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 6 Ct. Cases 924/2026
    BANARSIDAS CHANDIWALA SEWA SMARAK TRUST
    SOCIETY
    Vs.
    MOHD TASLEEM
    PS Jama Masjid
    19.05.2026
    Present: Sh. Anup Malhotra Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
    Complainant in person.
    Heard. Perused.
    Let ATR be called from concerned SHO for
    explaining the following points specifically.
    1. Whether compliant was received in police station?
    2. Whether complaint was received in the office of DCP?
    3. Whether the complaint discloses commission of cognizable
    offence and whether any action has been taken by the police
    on the complaint?
    4. Whether there is any delay in the filing of complaint?
    5. Whether, if no cognizable offence has been made out, the
    complainant has been informed accordingly or not?
    Copy of the complaint alongwith Annexure be supplied
    to the Naib Court concerned today itself.
    Reply shall be filed in point wise manner addressing
    each query of the Court as raised above.
    Re-list the matter on 25.08.2026.
    (Ms. Rashi Raheja)
    JMFC-13, Central/THC
    Delhi/19.05.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.