Full Order Text
Order 7 · 04 Dec 2024 · CNR DLCT020231852023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 23 CC NI ACT 2706/2024 INDUSIND BANK Vs. MOHSEEN 04.12.2024 Present:- Sh. Arun Pal, Ld. Counsel for complainant with AR. AR for complainant submits that in the month of June, 2023 there was a change in software of e-filing portal due to which the date of e-filing of the present matter is shown to be 22/06/2023 on the e-filing receipt placed on record along with affidavit and certificate U/s 65B Evidence Act whereas it is shown to be 26/09/2023 on the CIS system of this court Heard. Considered. This is a complaint filed for offence punishable under Section 138 N. I. Act. Complaint, affidavit of evidence and other annexed documents perused. In matter of “A. C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr.” (2014) 11 Supreme Court Cases 790, Full Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held as under:- “29. From a conjoint reading of Sections 138, 142 and 145 of the NI Act as well as Section 200 of the Code, it is clear that it is open to the Magistrate to issue process on the basis of the contents of the complaint, documents in support thereof and the affidavit submitted by the complainant in support of the complaint. Once the complainant files an affidavit in support of the complaint before issuance of the process under Section 200 of the Code, it is thereafter open to the Magistrate, if he thinks fit, to call upon the complainant to remain present and to examine him as to the facts contained in the affidavit submitted by the complainant in support of his complaint. However, it is a matter of discretion and the Magistrate is not bound to call upon the complainant to remain present before the court and to examine him upon oath for taking decision whether or not to issue process on the complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act. For the purpose of issuing process under Section 200 of the Code, it is open to the Magistrate to rely upon the verification in the form of affidavit filed by the complainant in support of the complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act. It is only if and where the Magistrate, after considering the complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act, documents produced in support thereof and the verification in the form of affidavit of the complainant, is of the view that examination of the complainant or his witness(s) is required, the Magistrate may call upon the complainant to remain present before the court and examine the complainant and/or his witness upon oath for taking a decision whether or not to issue process on the complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act.” Complaint, affidavit of evidence and documents considered in light of above cited judgment. In opinion of this Court, there is no need to examine the complainant's evidence for purpose of issuance of process. In view of complaint, documents -- 1 of 2 -- produced and verification in the form of affidavit of evidence, there are sufficient grounds for proceeding further against accused person(s) for offence punishable under Section 138 N. I. Act. I take cognizance of said offence. Hence, accused be summoned for offence u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act on filing of PF/RC. In the event the house/office/premises is found to be locked/refusal to accept the service/any other contingency the process be served through affixation. PF be filed within seven working days. Complainant is also liberty to serve the summon through Whatsap and E-mail. Complainant is directed to file an affidavit with regard to electronic service of summons along with certificate U/s 65B Evidence Act as per rule. Matter be taken up now on 19/03/2025. As per the guidelines laid down as in the case titled as “Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H”, AIR2010(SC) 1907, Ahlmad is directed to make a mention on the summons issued against the accused (by adding separate sheet, if required) that “accused can make an application for compounding of the offence at the first and second hearing of the case and if such an application is made, compounding may be allowed by the Court without imposing any costs on the accused.” (Shreya Singh) Judicial Magistrate First Class, (NI Act) - 05 (C)/THC/DELHI 04.12.2024 -- 2 of 2 --
