Interim Order 8

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 3 CC NI ACT 9179/2023
M/S MAXGTECH Vs. M/S OPTO TECH
10.03.2026
Present: Sh. Saqib, Ld. Counsel for complainant through VC.
AR Praveen Kumar Jain in person.
Accused no. 1 is proprietorship.
Accused no. 2, Sharath proprietor in person.
Accused no. 3 and 4 were never summoned.
Matter is at the stage of recording of S. A. u/s 313 Cr.P.C.
The statement of the accused has been recorded u/s 313 Cr.P.C.
However, parties submits that matter has been settled between the
parties for the cheque amount and accused has already paid Rs. 5 lacs.
Today the accused is handing over a PDC bearing no. 000076 for an
amount of Rs. 3 lacs drawn on HDFC Bank in the name of Selements (not drawn on
the accused in question). Accused submits that cheque is of his Guarantor namely
Mohan Prasad J. However, accused submits that said cheque will be honored. The
same is handed over to AR for complainant against due acknowledgment.
At this stage, complainant side submits that the matter has been
compounded by them qua cheque in question and they want to compound and
withdraw the present complaint before this Court. Let, statement of complainant side
be recorded accordingly.
Submissions of complainant side and statement of AR of complainant
considered. Compounding appears to be voluntarily made, equitable and there
appears to be no legal impediment in implementing/allowing the same. Accordingly,
compounding allowed.
Hence, matter stands compounded between both side for offence
punishable under Section 138 N. I. Act. Accused person(s) stands acquitted.
Documents, if any, be released to rightful claimant as per rules. P/B
and S/B, if any stands discharged.
Put up for further proceedings on 08.04.2026.
(URVI GUPTA)
J.M.F.C.-01(N.I.Act)/Central,
THC/Delhi/10.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --