Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

SHANKAR FININVEST PRIVATE LIMITEDVsSOLA KRISHNA CHAITANYA

CNR DLCT020208822026790-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 06
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
7449/2026
Registration Date
04 May 2026
Next Hearing Date
12 Jan 2027
Case Stage
Consideration

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1SHANKAR FININVEST PRIVATE LIMITED

    Respondent

    1. 1SOLA KRISHNA CHAITANYA

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Karol Bagh
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 14-08-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Consideration
Next Hearing Date: 12-01-2027

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 20882/2026
Filing Date: 25-04-2026
eFiling Number: ADL20230010644C202600075
eFiling Date: 23-04-2026
First Hearing Date: 14th August 2026
Court Number And Judge: 790-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 06

    Orders

    2
    Interim Order 1Full order available
    14 Aug 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 59CC NI ACT/7449/2026 DLCT020208822026 SHANKAR FININVEST PRIVATE LIMITED VS. SOLA KRISHNA CHAITANYA 14.08.2026 Fresh complaint case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present : Sh.K.N. Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the complainant (through VC). Submissions heard. Record perused. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision reported as A.C. Narayanan vs. State of Maharashtra (2014) 11 SCC 790 has held as under, “29. From a conjoint reading of Sections 138, 142…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1Full order available
    14 Aug 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 59CC NI ACT/7449/2026 DLCT020208822026 SHANKAR FININVEST PRIVATE LIMITED VS. SOLA KRISHNA CHAITANYA 14.08.2026 Fresh complaint case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present : Sh.K.N. Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the complainant (through VC). Submissions heard. Record perused. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision reported as A.C. Narayanan vs. State of Maharashtra (2014) 11 SCC 790 has held as under, “29. From a conjoint reading of Sections 138, 142…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.