Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

BD CREDITS LTDVsJainudin and Another

CNR DLCT020194502026810-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 08
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
6741/2026
Registration Date
17 Apr 2026
Next Hearing Date
28 Nov 2026
Case Stage
Arguments

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1BD CREDITS LTD

    Respondent

    1. 1Jainudin and Another

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Railway Sarai Rohilla
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 11-07-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 19450/2026
Filing Date: 16-04-2026
eFiling Number: LTN20230002925C202600125
eFiling Date: 14-04-2026
First Hearing Date: 11th July 2026
Court Number And Judge: 810-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 08

    Orders

    2
    Interim Order 1
    11 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: (Garima Garg)
JMFC (NI Act)-08,
Central, THC, Delhi 11.07.2026
53 CC NI ACT / 6741/2026
Bd Credits Ltd Vs. Jainudin and Another
11.07.2026
Present: Ld. Counsel for the complainant (through VC).
Fresh complaint received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as
per rules.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant has filed the original complaint alongwith
documents today. The same has been confirmed by the Reader of this court. Be taken on record.
Perusal of the record shows that there is no proof of service of legal demand
notice on the proposed accused persons.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant is directed to move an appropriate affidavit
verifying that the accused persons are residing at the same address only, where the demand notice
was served in compliance of judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in case titled as HDFC
Bank Ltd. Vs. Amit Kumar Singh, 2009 and in mandate of judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme
Court in CC. Alavi Haji V Palapetty Mohd. & Another 2007.
Put up for further proceedings on 28/11/2026.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    11 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: (Garima Garg)
JMFC (NI Act)-08,
Central, THC, Delhi 11.07.2026
53 CC NI ACT / 6741/2026
Bd Credits Ltd Vs. Jainudin and Another
11.07.2026
Present: Ld. Counsel for the complainant (through VC).
Fresh complaint received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as
per rules.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant has filed the original complaint alongwith
documents today. The same has been confirmed by the Reader of this court. Be taken on record.
Perusal of the record shows that there is no proof of service of legal demand
notice on the proposed accused persons.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant is directed to move an appropriate affidavit
verifying that the accused persons are residing at the same address only, where the demand notice
was served in compliance of judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in case titled as HDFC
Bank Ltd. Vs. Amit Kumar Singh, 2009 and in mandate of judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme
Court in CC. Alavi Haji V Palapetty Mohd. & Another 2007.
Put up for further proceedings on 28/11/2026.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.