Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

Shri Minhaj UddinVsShri Aadil Quader

CNR DLCT020190512026511-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 02
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
8553/2026
Registration Date
30 May 2026
Case Stage
Misc./ Appearance

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Shri Minhaj Uddin

    Respondent

    1. 1Shri Aadil Quader

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Jama Masjid
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case Timeline

    Newest first2 dates/groups
    Case ongoingFinal outcome awaited ···

    08 Aug 2026

    3 records
    Court Proceeding

    FP

    Next purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Read full proceeding
    Business: FP
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Interim Order 3

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 23 Cc NI ACT / 8553/2026 Shri Minhaj Uddin Vs. Shri Aadil Quader /0 (Jama Masjid) 08.08.2026 Present: Sh. Parvinder Singh, Ld. Counsel for the complainant alongwith…

    Read Full Order →
    Order 3

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 23 Cc NI ACT / 8553/2026 Shri Minhaj Uddin Vs. Shri Aadil Quader /0 (Jama Masjid) 08.08.2026 Present: Sh. Parvinder Singh, Ld. Counsel for the complainant alongwith…

    Read Full Order →

    27 Jun 2026

    5 records
    Court Proceeding

    FP

    Next purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Read full proceeding
    Business: FP
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Interim Order 2

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 23 CC NI ACT / 8553/2026 Shri Minhaj Uddin Vs. Shri Aadil Quader /0 (Jama Masjid) 27.06.2026 Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules.…

    View order details ↓
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 23 CC NI ACT / 8553/2026 Shri Minhaj Uddin Vs. Shri Aadil Quader /0 (Jama Masjid)
27.06.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules.
Present: Ld. Counsel for complainant along with complainant.
This is a fresh case.
In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij
Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to
issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage.
Hence, appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with.
Perusal of the record reveals that tracking report regarding legal demand notice
sent to the proposed accused has not been annexed.
Accordingly, complainant is directed to file tracking report/affidavit of proof of
service of the legal demand notice to the proposed accused on or before NDOH in view of
judgment ie. HDFC Vs. Amit Kumar, AIR 2010(NOC) 407 (DEL.), 2010 of Hon’ble High
Court.
Be put up on 08.08.2026
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
THC/Delhi/27.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 23 CC NI ACT / 8553/2026 Shri Minhaj Uddin Vs. Shri Aadil Quader /0 (Jama Masjid) 27.06.2026 Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules.…

    View order details ↓
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 23 CC NI ACT / 8553/2026 Shri Minhaj Uddin Vs. Shri Aadil Quader /0 (Jama Masjid)
27.06.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules.
Present: Ld. Counsel for complainant along with complainant.
This is a fresh case.
In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij
Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to
issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage.
Hence, appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with.
Perusal of the record reveals that tracking report regarding legal demand notice
sent to the proposed accused has not been annexed.
Accordingly, complainant is directed to file tracking report/affidavit of proof of
service of the legal demand notice to the proposed accused on or before NDOH in view of
judgment ie. HDFC Vs. Amit Kumar, AIR 2010(NOC) 407 (DEL.), 2010 of Hon’ble High
Court.
Be put up on 08.08.2026
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
THC/Delhi/27.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 23 CC NI ACT / 8553/2026 Shri Minhaj Uddin Vs. Shri Aadil Quader /0 (Jama Masjid) 27.06.2026 Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules.…

    View order details ↓
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 23 CC NI ACT / 8553/2026 Shri Minhaj Uddin Vs. Shri Aadil Quader /0 (Jama Masjid)
27.06.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules.
Present: Ld. Counsel for complainant along with complainant.
This is a fresh case.
In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij
Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to
issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage.
Hence, appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with.
Perusal of the record reveals that tracking report regarding legal demand notice
sent to the proposed accused has not been annexed.
Accordingly, complainant is directed to file tracking report/affidavit of proof of
service of the legal demand notice to the proposed accused on or before NDOH in view of
judgment ie. HDFC Vs. Amit Kumar, AIR 2010(NOC) 407 (DEL.), 2010 of Hon’ble High
Court.
Be put up on 08.08.2026
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
THC/Delhi/27.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 23 CC NI ACT / 8553/2026 Shri Minhaj Uddin Vs. Shri Aadil Quader /0 (Jama Masjid) 27.06.2026 Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules.…

    View order details ↓
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 23 CC NI ACT / 8553/2026 Shri Minhaj Uddin Vs. Shri Aadil Quader /0 (Jama Masjid)
27.06.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules.
Present: Ld. Counsel for complainant along with complainant.
This is a fresh case.
In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij
Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to
issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage.
Hence, appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with.
Perusal of the record reveals that tracking report regarding legal demand notice
sent to the proposed accused has not been annexed.
Accordingly, complainant is directed to file tracking report/affidavit of proof of
service of the legal demand notice to the proposed accused on or before NDOH in view of
judgment ie. HDFC Vs. Amit Kumar, AIR 2010(NOC) 407 (DEL.), 2010 of Hon’ble High
Court.
Be put up on 08.08.2026
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
THC/Delhi/27.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 19051/2026
Filing Date: 13-04-2026
eFiling Number: ADL20230006201C202600009
eFiling Date: 10-04-2026
First Hearing Date: 27th June 2026
Court Number And Judge: 511-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 02

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.