Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

ABUZAR TAJVsASHRAF BHAT

CNR DLCT020182932026511-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 02
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
6671/2026
Registration Date
16 Apr 2026
Next Hearing Date
07 Jan 2027
Case Stage
Misc./ Appearance

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1ABUZAR TAJ

    Respondent

    1. 1ASHRAF BHAT

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Sadar Bazar
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 11-05-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 31-07-2026

Date: 31-07-2026
Business: FP
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 07-01-2027

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 18293/2026
Filing Date: 09-04-2026
eFiling Number: ADL20230003941C202600005
eFiling Date: 07-04-2026
First Hearing Date: 11th May 2026
Court Number And Judge: 511-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 02

    Orders

    4
    Interim Order 2
    31 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 41 CC NI ACT / 6671/2026 ABUZAR TAJ Vs. ASHRAF BHAT /0 (Sadar Bazar)
CNR No:DLCT020182932026
31.07.2026
Present: Ms Kashish Arora, Ld counsel for the complainant through VC
Matter is at the stage of consideration and is pending for clarifications.
Ld counsel for the complainant seeks adjournment as complainant is not present
today.
Be put up for purpose fixed on 07.01.2027.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
THC/Delhi/31.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    11 May 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 51 CC NI ACT / 6671/2026 ABUZAR TAJ Vs. ASHRAF BHAT /0 (Sadar Bazar)
11.05.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per
rules.
Present: Ld counsel for the complainant.
This is a fresh case.
In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij
Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to
issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage.
Hence, appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with.
Perusal of the record shows that as per the legal notice, complainant claimed Rs
55 lakhs along with interest and legal expenses, however, the cheque annexed with the record is
only of Rs 50 lakhs. Hence, the legal notice is not good as per the law.
Complainant is directed to clarify on the aforesaid aspect and maintainability of
the present case.
Be put up for further proceedings on 31.07.2026.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
THC/Delhi/11.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    31 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 41 CC NI ACT / 6671/2026 ABUZAR TAJ Vs. ASHRAF BHAT /0 (Sadar Bazar)
CNR No:DLCT020182932026
31.07.2026
Present: Ms Kashish Arora, Ld counsel for the complainant through VC
Matter is at the stage of consideration and is pending for clarifications.
Ld counsel for the complainant seeks adjournment as complainant is not present
today.
Be put up for purpose fixed on 07.01.2027.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
THC/Delhi/31.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    11 May 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 51 CC NI ACT / 6671/2026 ABUZAR TAJ Vs. ASHRAF BHAT /0 (Sadar Bazar)
11.05.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per
rules.
Present: Ld counsel for the complainant.
This is a fresh case.
In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij
Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to
issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage.
Hence, appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with.
Perusal of the record shows that as per the legal notice, complainant claimed Rs
55 lakhs along with interest and legal expenses, however, the cheque annexed with the record is
only of Rs 50 lakhs. Hence, the legal notice is not good as per the law.
Complainant is directed to clarify on the aforesaid aspect and maintainability of
the present case.
Be put up for further proceedings on 31.07.2026.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
THC/Delhi/11.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.