CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

Raj Kumar ChandhokVsJiwan Singh

CNR DLCT020172742026511-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 02

Tis Hazari, CMM Court

delhi · Delhi (DL)

PENDING

TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number: 6483/2026
Registration Date: 10 Apr 2026
Next Hearing Date: 20 Nov 2026
Case Stage: Misc./ Appearance

Advocates

For Petitioner

VINEET MEHTA

For Respondent

Not available

Parties

Petitioner

1Raj Kumar Chandhok

Respondent

1Jiwan Singh

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

Police / FIR Details

Police Station: Kotwali
FIR Number / Year: 0

Case History / Proceedings

Case History

Date: 15-05-2026
Business: FP
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 05-06-2026

Date: 05-06-2026
Business: FP
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 26-09-2026

Date: 26-09-2026
Business: FP
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 20-11-2026

Additional Case Details

Filing Number: 17274/2026
Filing Date: 02-04-2026
eFiling Number: ADL20230005068C202600006
eFiling Date: 28-03-2026
First Hearing Date: 15th May 2026
Court Number And Judge: 511-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 02

Orders

Interim Order 3

26 Sept 2026

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 30 Cc NI ACT 6483/2026 Raj Kumar Chandhok Vs. Jiwan sINGH /0 (Kotwali)
CNR No: DLCT020172742026
26.09.2026
Present: Complainant with Ld counsel Sh Vinit Gupta.
None for the accused.
Matter is at the stage of appearance of accused.
Summons issued against the accused received back served by way of affixation.
Reports perused. As per the report, accused is stated to have left the given address 3 to 4 years
ago.
Ld counsel for the complainant submits that the address mentioned in the
complaint is the principal place of business of the accused and they are operating from the said
address only.
Complainant is directed to file fresh address, if any/ affidavit of physical
verification of the address of the accused along with photographs by NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 20.11.2026.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC(NI ACT-02)/Central
Delhi/26.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Interim Order 2Full order available

05 Jun 2026

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 41 CC NI ACT / 6483/2026 Raj Kumar Chandhok Vs. JIWAN SINGH /0 (Kotwali) 05.06.2026 Present: Complainant with Ld counsel. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Complainant has filed GST record in terms of last order. Perused. As per the same, Jiwan Singh & Sons is the partnership having three partners namely Gurvinder Singh, Naunehal Singh and Sunpreet Singh. Same is taken on record. Arguments heard on point of summoning. Following the…

Read Full Order

Interim Order 1

15 May 2026

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 34 CC NI ACT / 6483/2026 Raj Kumar Chandhok Vs. JIWAN sINGH /0 (Kotwali)
15.05.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per
rules.
Present: Ld counsel for the complainant.
This is a fresh case.
In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij
Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to
issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage.
Hence, appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with.
Perusal of the record shows that no proof of ownership of accused on record ie
form 32 IR, ROC Data, Company Master Data or any GST registration, etc is placed on record.
Proposed accused is stated to be a partnership firm.
In view of the above, complainant is directed to place on record the document
mentioning the name of the partners of proposed accused as per the GST record.
Be put up on 05.06.2026.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
THC/Delhi/15.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order 3

26 Sept 2026

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 30 Cc NI ACT 6483/2026 Raj Kumar Chandhok Vs. Jiwan sINGH /0 (Kotwali)
CNR No: DLCT020172742026
26.09.2026
Present: Complainant with Ld counsel Sh Vinit Gupta.
None for the accused.
Matter is at the stage of appearance of accused.
Summons issued against the accused received back served by way of affixation.
Reports perused. As per the report, accused is stated to have left the given address 3 to 4 years
ago.
Ld counsel for the complainant submits that the address mentioned in the
complaint is the principal place of business of the accused and they are operating from the said
address only.
Complainant is directed to file fresh address, if any/ affidavit of physical
verification of the address of the accused along with photographs by NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 20.11.2026.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC(NI ACT-02)/Central
Delhi/26.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order 2Full order available

05 Jun 2026

Read Full Order

Order 1

15 May 2026

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 34 CC NI ACT / 6483/2026 Raj Kumar Chandhok Vs. JIWAN sINGH /0 (Kotwali)
15.05.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per
rules.
Present: Ld counsel for the complainant.
This is a fresh case.
In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij
Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to
issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage.
Hence, appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with.
Perusal of the record shows that no proof of ownership of accused on record ie
form 32 IR, ROC Data, Company Master Data or any GST registration, etc is placed on record.
Proposed accused is stated to be a partnership firm.
In view of the above, complainant is directed to place on record the document
mentioning the name of the partners of proposed accused as per the GST record.
Be put up on 05.06.2026.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
THC/Delhi/15.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.