ANUJ AGGARWALVsAsha Gupta

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 42 CC NI ACT / 6646/2026 ANUJ AGGARWAL Vs. ASHA GUPTA 0000000/0 (Hauz Qazi)
05.06.2026
Present: Ld counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Ld counsel for the complainant submits that proceedings qua proposed accused
no 2 Vinamra Jain be dropped and requests that he be deleted from the array of the parties.
In view of submissions, proceedings qua proposed accused no. 2 Vinamra Jain
stands dropped and he is deleted from the array of the parties.
Perusal of the record shows that there is delay of one day in filing of the present
matter.
Ld counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay
Submissions heard. Record perused.
Let notice of aforesaid application be issued to the proposed accused on filing of
PF/RC/AD for the NDOH. Service be also affected dasti as well as on the email, WhatsApp
message(s) and text message of proposed accused person(s), as provided by the complainant and
further subject to filing of affidavit of service. PF be filed within one month.
Be put up for further proceedings on 15.09.2026.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
THC/Delhi/05.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 53 CC NI ACT No. 6646/2026
ANUJ AGGARWAL Vs. ASHA GUPTA
02.05.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per
rules.
Present: Sh. Rishikant Mishra, Ld. Counsel for complainant through VC.
This is a fresh case.
In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in
“Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall
be no requirement to issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of
BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage. Hence, appearance of proposed accused is
hereby dispensed with.
Perusal of record shows that Asha Gupta is stated to be proprietor of
ML paper and packaging, however, cheques in question are stated to have been
signed by its authorised signatory Vinamra Jain. Both Asha Gupta and Vinamra
Jain have been arrayed as accused in this matter.
Upon inquiry, Ld. Counsel for complainant seeks time to file relevant
judgments for summoning of both the aforesaid persons or to file amended memo
of parties, if required. Allowed.
Put up for consideration on 05.06.2026.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
THC/Delhi/02.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 38 CC NI ACT / 6646/2026 ANUJ AGGARWAL Vs. ASHA GUPTA 0000000/0 (Hauz Qazi)
15.09.2026
Present: Mr Utkarsh Mishra, Ld proxy counsel for the complainant.
Proposed accused absent.
Mr Vinamra Jain, son of proposed accused through VC
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Application for condonation of delay is pending adjudication.
Notice issued to proposed accused received back served.
Ld proxy counsel for the complainant has filed tracking report regarding service of
notice. Perused. As per the same, notice was served upon the proposed accused.
Ld proxy counsel for the complainant has also filed amended memo of parties.
Same is taken on record.
Son of the proposed accused submits that the copy of the complaint and
application has been received.
Reply, if any be filed by the NDOH.
Be put up for arguments on aforesaid application on 13.01.2027.
Proposed accused shall appear in person on the NDOH.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)
Central/THC, Delhi
15.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 42 CC NI ACT / 6646/2026 ANUJ AGGARWAL Vs. ASHA GUPTA 0000000/0 (Hauz Qazi)
05.06.2026
Present: Ld counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Ld counsel for the complainant submits that proceedings qua proposed accused
no 2 Vinamra Jain be dropped and requests that he be deleted from the array of the parties.
In view of submissions, proceedings qua proposed accused no. 2 Vinamra Jain
stands dropped and he is deleted from the array of the parties.
Perusal of the record shows that there is delay of one day in filing of the present
matter.
Ld counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay
Submissions heard. Record perused.
Let notice of aforesaid application be issued to the proposed accused on filing of
PF/RC/AD for the NDOH. Service be also affected dasti as well as on the email, WhatsApp
message(s) and text message of proposed accused person(s), as provided by the complainant and
further subject to filing of affidavit of service. PF be filed within one month.
Be put up for further proceedings on 15.09.2026.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
THC/Delhi/05.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 53 CC NI ACT No. 6646/2026
ANUJ AGGARWAL Vs. ASHA GUPTA
02.05.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per
rules.
Present: Sh. Rishikant Mishra, Ld. Counsel for complainant through VC.
This is a fresh case.
In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in
“Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall
be no requirement to issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of
BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage. Hence, appearance of proposed accused is
hereby dispensed with.
Perusal of record shows that Asha Gupta is stated to be proprietor of
ML paper and packaging, however, cheques in question are stated to have been
signed by its authorised signatory Vinamra Jain. Both Asha Gupta and Vinamra
Jain have been arrayed as accused in this matter.
Upon inquiry, Ld. Counsel for complainant seeks time to file relevant
judgments for summoning of both the aforesaid persons or to file amended memo
of parties, if required. Allowed.
Put up for consideration on 05.06.2026.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
THC/Delhi/02.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --