Order 1

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Cr. Case No. 7228/23
STATE Vs. SABUDDIN
FIR No. 117/23
U/s 279/338 IPC
PS Darya Ganj
05.06.2023
Fresh charge-sheet received from filing counter. It be checked and registered
as per rules.
Present: Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Ld. APP for the State.
Complainant in person alongwith one of the injured Sachin.
IO HC Chhgan Lal Meena in person.
Both the witnesses have broadly stated the circumstances
under which the accident in question occurred. It is seen that in the
complainant statement recorded by the IO, it is stated that the driver as well
as the conductor of the offending vehicle help the victims into the
ambulance whereafter which they were taken to LNJP Hospital.
Complainant however has stated no such thing and in fact apprise the Court
that the bus driver had taken the bus away after a while. Moreover, the IO
states that the number of the offending vehicle was told by the victims
themselves. He himself concedes that the footage of the incident in question
does not clearly contain such number. It is not clear as to how and under
what circumstances the victims could have told the bus no. to the police that
they were injured to such an extent that the FIR came to be registered 03
days after the incident. Further, the IO states that the accident in question
took place on account of the offending vehicle not using the proper indicator
at the time as it was not working. However, upon Court query, the IO is
unable to show any verification made in that behalf to the Court. Moreover,
the IO is unable to show any case diary entry made in that behalf either. The
third victim Sonu is presently stated to be unwell and unable to appear in
Court.
Considering the above, the IO is directed to substantiate the
police case by marking the relevant diary entries made regarding the above-
mentioned factual scenario positively on NDOH.
Re-list on 25.07.2023.
(Gaurav Sharma)
MM-05/Central:
Delhi/05.06.2023
-- 1 of 1 --