Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 48 CC NI ACT / 6587/2025 Aditya infotech Ltd Vs. Abhishek proprietor Jai Mata Di Enterprises 30.06.2026 Present : Mr. Rohit Laxwal (through VC) and Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Vide judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr. (criminal appeal no. 1755/2010) decided on 25.09.2025, it was held that there is no requirement of sending a notice…
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act
Aditya Infotech LtdVsAbhishek proprietor Jai Mata Di Enterprises
CNR DLCT020137022025512-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 03
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING
TrustJury record updated 15 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 6587/2025
- Registration Date
- 28 Mar 2025
- Next Hearing Date
- 17 Dec 2026
- Case Stage
- Misc./ Appearance
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138 · 141
Police / FIR Details
- Police Station
- Darya Ganj
- FIR Number / Year
- 0
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 22-05-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Consideration Next Hearing Date: 28-06-2025 Date: 28-06-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Consideration Next Hearing Date: 13-10-2025 Date: 13-10-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Consideration Next Hearing Date: 19-01-2026 Date: 19-01-2026 Business: FP Reason For Adjournment: None is present Next Purpose: Consideration Next Hearing Date: 30-06-2026 Date: 30-06-2026 Business: y Reason For Adjournment: Accused Absent Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 17-12-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 13702/2025 Filing Date: 25-03-2025 eFiling Number: ADL20230004353C202500018 eFiling Date: 24-03-2025 First Hearing Date: 22nd May 2025 Court Number And Judge: 512-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 03
Orders
10Interim Order 5Full order available
30 Jun 2026
Interim Order 419 Jan 2026
19 Jan 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CC NI ACT / 6587/2025 Aditya infotech Ltd Vs. Abhishek proprietor Jai Mata Di Enterprises 19.01.2026 VC of the Court is not working due to internet connectivity issue. Present matter has been received by way of transfer. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present : Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Ld. Proxy counsel for complainant. Complete record not received. Put up for further proceedings on 30.06.2026. (Pranjal Gangwar) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act)-03 Central/Delhi/19.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 313 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Ld. PO is on leave today. 64 CC NI ACT / 6587/2025 Aditya infotech Ltd Vs. Abhishek proprietor Jai Mata Di Enterprises /0 (Darya Ganj) 13.10.2025 Proceedings conducted through video conferencing via Cisco Webex App. Matter taken up through Video Conferencing as per office order of Hon'ble Delhi High Court as per order no. 4/7/RG/DHC/2020 dated 27.08.2020. Present: Sh. Rohit Rexwal and Aditya Raj, Ld. proxy counsel for the complainant. Put up for purpose fixed/further proceedings on 19.01.2026. (MAYANK AGGARWAL) Link-Judicial Magistrate First Class (N.I. Act) Digital Court-02, Central, Delhi/13.10.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 228 Jun 2025
28 Jun 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 65 CC NO. - / 6587/2025 - Aditya infotech Ltd Vs. Abhishek proprietor Jai Mata Di Enterprises 28.06.2025 Proceedings conducted through video conferencing via Cisco Webex App. Present - Sh. Rohit Rexwal, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Perusal of the record shows that present complaint has been filed after 01.07.2024 and the proceedings in the present matter shall be governed by Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sahita 2023 (BNSS). As per proviso of section 233(1) BNSS, it is incumbent upon the court to afford an opportunity of hearing to the accused before taking cognizance of an offence. In view thereof, let notice be issued to the proposed accused on filing of PF within 15 days through RC-AD, & speed post/approved courier service and through whatsapp/Email, and other approved modes, returnable for 13.10.2025. (POOJA SUHAG) Judicial Magistrate First Class (N.I. Act) Digital Court 01, Central, Delhi/28.06.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 122 May 2025
22 May 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 65CC NO. - /6587/2025 Aditya infotech Ltd Vs. Abhishekproprietor Jai Mata Di Enterprises 22.05.2025 Proceedings conducted through video conferencing via Cisco Webex App. Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present - None, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Put up for consideration on 28.06.2025. (POOJA SUHAG) Judicial Magisrae Firs Class (N.I. Ac) Digial Cour -01, Cenral, Delhi/22.05.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 5Full order available
30 Jun 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 48 CC NI ACT / 6587/2025 Aditya infotech Ltd Vs. Abhishek proprietor Jai Mata Di Enterprises 30.06.2026 Present : Mr. Rohit Laxwal (through VC) and Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Vide judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr. (criminal appeal no. 1755/2010) decided on 25.09.2025, it was held that there is no requirement of sending a notice…
Order 419 Jan 2026
19 Jan 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CC NI ACT / 6587/2025 Aditya infotech Ltd Vs. Abhishek proprietor Jai Mata Di Enterprises 19.01.2026 VC of the Court is not working due to internet connectivity issue. Present matter has been received by way of transfer. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present : Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Ld. Proxy counsel for complainant. Complete record not received. Put up for further proceedings on 30.06.2026. (Pranjal Gangwar) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act)-03 Central/Delhi/19.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 313 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Ld. PO is on leave today. 64 CC NI ACT / 6587/2025 Aditya infotech Ltd Vs. Abhishek proprietor Jai Mata Di Enterprises /0 (Darya Ganj) 13.10.2025 Proceedings conducted through video conferencing via Cisco Webex App. Matter taken up through Video Conferencing as per office order of Hon'ble Delhi High Court as per order no. 4/7/RG/DHC/2020 dated 27.08.2020. Present: Sh. Rohit Rexwal and Aditya Raj, Ld. proxy counsel for the complainant. Put up for purpose fixed/further proceedings on 19.01.2026. (MAYANK AGGARWAL) Link-Judicial Magistrate First Class (N.I. Act) Digital Court-02, Central, Delhi/13.10.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 228 Jun 2025
28 Jun 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 65 CC NO. - / 6587/2025 - Aditya infotech Ltd Vs. Abhishek proprietor Jai Mata Di Enterprises 28.06.2025 Proceedings conducted through video conferencing via Cisco Webex App. Present - Sh. Rohit Rexwal, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Perusal of the record shows that present complaint has been filed after 01.07.2024 and the proceedings in the present matter shall be governed by Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sahita 2023 (BNSS). As per proviso of section 233(1) BNSS, it is incumbent upon the court to afford an opportunity of hearing to the accused before taking cognizance of an offence. In view thereof, let notice be issued to the proposed accused on filing of PF within 15 days through RC-AD, & speed post/approved courier service and through whatsapp/Email, and other approved modes, returnable for 13.10.2025. (POOJA SUHAG) Judicial Magistrate First Class (N.I. Act) Digital Court 01, Central, Delhi/28.06.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 122 May 2025
22 May 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 65CC NO. - /6587/2025 Aditya infotech Ltd Vs. Abhishekproprietor Jai Mata Di Enterprises 22.05.2025 Proceedings conducted through video conferencing via Cisco Webex App. Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present - None, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Put up for consideration on 28.06.2025. (POOJA SUHAG) Judicial Magisrae Firs Class (N.I. Ac) Digial Cour -01, Cenral, Delhi/22.05.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
