Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

MOHD SHABIR ANSARIVsShri Pankaj Kumar

CNR DLCT020126022025789-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 05
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 15 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
6156/2025
Registration Date
24 Mar 2025
Next Hearing Date
10 Feb 2027
Case Stage
Misc./ Appearance

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Railway Sarai Rohilla
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 15-05-2025
    Business: f.p.
    Next Purpose: Consideration
    Next Hearing Date: 13-10-2025
    
    Date: 13-10-2025
    Business: f.p.
    Next Purpose: Consideration
    Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2025
    
    Date: 05-12-2025
    Business: FP
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 16-05-2026
    
    Date: 16-05-2026
    Business: FP
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 09-10-2026
    
    Date: 09-10-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 10-02-2027

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 12602/2025
    Filing Date: 19-03-2025
    eFiling Number: ADL20230007380C202500008
    eFiling Date: 11-03-2025
    First Hearing Date: 15th May 2025
    Court Number And Judge: 789-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 05

    Orders

    10
    Interim Order 5
    09 Oct 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 21 CC NI ACT / 6156/2025 Mohd Shabir Ansari Vs. Shri Pankaj
    Kumar
    /0 (Railway Sarai
    Rohilla)
    09.10.2026
    Present: Sh. Sanjeev, Ld. Counsel for complainant.
    Summons issued to the accused through ordinary process received back
    with the report that the accused could not be found at the given address despite
    several inquiries.
    However, tracking report has been filed on behalf of the complainant. As
    per the same, the item delivery is confirmed.
    However, none is present on behalf of the accused today.
    Issue BWs against the accused for NDOH in the sum of Rs. 2,000/- with
    one surety in the like amount on filing of PF within two weeks, returnable on
    10.02.2027.
    (ARJUN KIRAR)
    JMFC (NI Act)- 05/ Central District
    THC/Delhi/09.10.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 4Full order available
    16 May 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 18 CC NI ACT / 6156/2025 Mohd Shabir Ansari Vs. Shri Pankaj Kumar 16.05.2026 Present: Sh. Sanjeev, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In terms of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in ‘Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr.’, pronounced on 25.09.2025, in Criminal Appeal No.1755/2010, requirement for issuing notice u/s 223 BNSS to proposed accused stands dispensed with. Pre-summoning Evidence by way of…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 3
    05 Dec 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 112 CC NI ACT / 6156/2025 Mohd Shabir Ansari Vs. Shri Pankaj
    Kumar /0 (Railway Sarai Rohilla)
    05.12.2025
    Matter is received digitally by way of transfer vide order
    dated 91791-820/F.3(4)JMFC/Gaz./2025 dated 21.11.2025 from the
    Court of JMFC, NI Act, Digital Court-03, Central District, Delhi.
    Present: Sh. Dimple, ld counsel for the complainant.
    Physical file of the present case has not been received.
    Complainant is directed to file complete physical file before
    NDOH if he has not filed the same earlier before digital court.
    Put up for further proceedings on 16.05.2026.
    (ARJUN KIRAR)
    JMFC (NI Act) – 05/ Central District
    THC/Delhi/05.12.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    13 Oct 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 61 CC NO. - / 6156/2025 - Mohd Shabir Ansari Vs. Shri Pankaj
    Kumar
    13.10.2025
    Proceedings conducted online through VC using Cisco Webex as well as
    through Hybrid Mode.
    Present - Sh. A.N. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the complainant with
    complainant.
    Clarification is sought from the complainant regarding the
    period of limitation in sending the legal demand notice to the proposed
    accused.
    Put up for consideration/further proceedings on 05.12.2025.
    (Shubhamjot Kaur Rakhra)
    Judicial Magistrate, First Class
    (N.I. Act), Digital Court-03,
    Central, THC,Delhi/13.10.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    15 May 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 69 CC NI ACT / 6156/2025
    Mohd Shabir Ansari Vs. Shri Pankaj Kumar
    15.05.2025
    Proceedings conducted online through VC using Cisco Webex as
    well as through Hybrid Mode.
    Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and
    registered.
    Regular stenographer is on leave today.
    Present : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Ld. counsel for the complainant
    alongwith complainant in person.
    As per section 531 of the BNSS, the present
    complaint shall be governed by the BNSS.
    Given the mandate of section 223 of the BNSS, let
    court notice be issued to the proposed accused person/persons
    through all permissible modes including the e-mode by Nazarat
    Branch, on filing of PF, to appear before the court and argue on
    the point of cognizance. PF be filed within two weeks from
    today.
    Put up for appearance of proposed accused and
    arguments on point of cognizance on 13.10.2025.
    (
    Short date is not possible due to the heavy
    pendency of cases in this court).
    The order be uploaded as per rules.
    (Meena Chauhan)
    Judicial Magistrate, First Class
    (N.I. Act), Digital Court-03,
    Central, THC,Delhi/15.05.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 5
    09 Oct 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 21 CC NI ACT / 6156/2025 Mohd Shabir Ansari Vs. Shri Pankaj
    Kumar
    /0 (Railway Sarai
    Rohilla)
    09.10.2026
    Present: Sh. Sanjeev, Ld. Counsel for complainant.
    Summons issued to the accused through ordinary process received back
    with the report that the accused could not be found at the given address despite
    several inquiries.
    However, tracking report has been filed on behalf of the complainant. As
    per the same, the item delivery is confirmed.
    However, none is present on behalf of the accused today.
    Issue BWs against the accused for NDOH in the sum of Rs. 2,000/- with
    one surety in the like amount on filing of PF within two weeks, returnable on
    10.02.2027.
    (ARJUN KIRAR)
    JMFC (NI Act)- 05/ Central District
    THC/Delhi/09.10.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4Full order available
    16 May 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 18 CC NI ACT / 6156/2025 Mohd Shabir Ansari Vs. Shri Pankaj Kumar 16.05.2026 Present: Sh. Sanjeev, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In terms of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in ‘Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr.’, pronounced on 25.09.2025, in Criminal Appeal No.1755/2010, requirement for issuing notice u/s 223 BNSS to proposed accused stands dispensed with. Pre-summoning Evidence by way of…

    Read Full Order
    Order 3
    05 Dec 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 112 CC NI ACT / 6156/2025 Mohd Shabir Ansari Vs. Shri Pankaj
    Kumar /0 (Railway Sarai Rohilla)
    05.12.2025
    Matter is received digitally by way of transfer vide order
    dated 91791-820/F.3(4)JMFC/Gaz./2025 dated 21.11.2025 from the
    Court of JMFC, NI Act, Digital Court-03, Central District, Delhi.
    Present: Sh. Dimple, ld counsel for the complainant.
    Physical file of the present case has not been received.
    Complainant is directed to file complete physical file before
    NDOH if he has not filed the same earlier before digital court.
    Put up for further proceedings on 16.05.2026.
    (ARJUN KIRAR)
    JMFC (NI Act) – 05/ Central District
    THC/Delhi/05.12.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    13 Oct 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 61 CC NO. - / 6156/2025 - Mohd Shabir Ansari Vs. Shri Pankaj
    Kumar
    13.10.2025
    Proceedings conducted online through VC using Cisco Webex as well as
    through Hybrid Mode.
    Present - Sh. A.N. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the complainant with
    complainant.
    Clarification is sought from the complainant regarding the
    period of limitation in sending the legal demand notice to the proposed
    accused.
    Put up for consideration/further proceedings on 05.12.2025.
    (Shubhamjot Kaur Rakhra)
    Judicial Magistrate, First Class
    (N.I. Act), Digital Court-03,
    Central, THC,Delhi/13.10.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    15 May 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 69 CC NI ACT / 6156/2025
    Mohd Shabir Ansari Vs. Shri Pankaj Kumar
    15.05.2025
    Proceedings conducted online through VC using Cisco Webex as
    well as through Hybrid Mode.
    Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and
    registered.
    Regular stenographer is on leave today.
    Present : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Ld. counsel for the complainant
    alongwith complainant in person.
    As per section 531 of the BNSS, the present
    complaint shall be governed by the BNSS.
    Given the mandate of section 223 of the BNSS, let
    court notice be issued to the proposed accused person/persons
    through all permissible modes including the e-mode by Nazarat
    Branch, on filing of PF, to appear before the court and argue on
    the point of cognizance. PF be filed within two weeks from
    today.
    Put up for appearance of proposed accused and
    arguments on point of cognizance on 13.10.2025.
    (
    Short date is not possible due to the heavy
    pendency of cases in this court).
    The order be uploaded as per rules.
    (Meena Chauhan)
    Judicial Magistrate, First Class
    (N.I. Act), Digital Court-03,
    Central, THC,Delhi/15.05.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.