Full Order Text
Order 11 · 27 Jan 2026 · CNR DLCT020091782024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 33 CC NI ACT / 3706/2024 M/s Nakoda Textiles Vs. M/s Sahiba Creations India Pvt Ltd 27.01.2026 (Regular Stenographer of this court is on leave). Present: Sh. A.K. Goswami and Sh. Nitesh Goswami, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Ms. Pooja Yadav, Ld. Counsel for accused No.1 and 2 (Through VC). Accused no.1 is a company. Accused No.2 (Through VC). Matter is listed for framing of notice. Oral exemption has been sought on behalf of the accused on medical grounds. The same is objected to by Ld. Counsel for complainant on the ground that accused is deliberately avoding appearance before the court. On an inquiry as to what is not well, the accused has not responded and Ld. Counsel for accused appearing through V.C. submits that the accused has back ache. On asking if any medical documents have been filed, Ld. Counsel for accused seeks a pass over till 2.00 pm and submits that accused will appear physically in the court at or before 2.00 pm. At request, be taken up at 2.00 pm. (Danveer) Judicial Magistrate First Class-04, NI Act 27.01.2026 At 2.00 pm Present: Sh. A.K. Goswami and Sh. Nitesh Goswami, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Ms. Pooja Yadav, Ld. Counsel for accused No.1 and 2 (Through VC). Accused no.1 is a company. Accused No.2 (Through VC). -- 1 of 3 -- Ld. Counsel for accused persons submits that the accused No.2 cannot appear in the court today. On asking accused No.2 as to the reason, accused No.2 has not responded. Ld. Counsel for complainant submits that the accused is deliberatedly avoiding the proceedings of the court and has not even furnished the bail bonds till date. Reference is made to the previous ordersheets to show that the conduct of the accused is dilotary. A prayer is made by Ld. Counsel for complainant for cancellation of bail granted to the accused. Heard. Considered. Perused. The present appearance of accused No.2 is ineffective in the eyes of law as the accused is not responding to the questions. In these circumstances, the proceedings of framing of notice and asking question and obtaining their answeres cannot be conducted through V.C. as the accused No.2 is non-responsive. Perusal of record reveals that present matter is of the year 2024 and more than 1.5 years have passed and the accused has not effectively participated in the proceedings. Further, multiple opportunities have been given to accused No.2 and even cost has been imposed multiple times due to their absence and effective non-presence, but they have not entered effective presence till date. The ineffective presence of the accused on account of non-responses to basic questions as to the present case cannot assist in conducting the proceedings through V.C. The accused No.2 has not even furnished bail bonds till date. Further, previous cost has not been paid by accused No.2. Despite having been granted multiple opportunities, the consistent non- participative approach and conduct of the accused No.2 has failed the purpose of Section 143 (3) of N.I. Act. In view of the above circumstances, this court is constrained to issue B.Ws against the accused. Issue B.Ws in the sum of Rs.20,000/- against the accused with one surety in the like amount returnable for the NDOH. -- 2 of 3 -- List the matter for furnishing of bail bonds/framing of notice on 31.01.2026. Accused is directed to appear physically on NDOH. In the interest of justice, one last and final opportunity is granted to the accused No.2 to enter effective appearance, failing which, their bail shall be cancelled. (Danveer) Judicial Magistrate First Class-04, NI Act 27.01.2026 -- 3 of 3 --
