Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

RAKESH ARORAVsRahul Madhusudhan Thosar

CNR DLCT020084662024508-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 01
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 14 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
2964/2024
Registration Date
19 Mar 2024
Next Hearing Date
27 Jul 2027
Case Stage
Prosecution Evidence

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1RAKESH ARORA

    Respondent

    1. 1Rahul Madhusudhan Thosar

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Kamla Market
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 19-03-2024
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 05-08-2024

Date: 05-08-2024
Business: FP
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 10-12-2024

Date: 10-12-2024
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 11-03-2025

Date: 11-03-2025
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 03-06-2025

Date: 03-06-2025
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 23-09-2025

Date: 23-09-2025
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 24-02-2026

Date: 24-02-2026
Business: fp
Reason For Adjournment: Clarifications needed
Next Purpose: Prosecution Evidence
Next Hearing Date: 22-09-2026

Date: 22-09-2026
Business: fp
Reason For Adjournment: Accused Absent
Next Purpose: Prosecution Evidence
Next Hearing Date: 27-07-2027

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 8466/2024
Filing Date: 16-03-2024
eFiling Number: ADL20230017604C202400011
eFiling Date: 11-03-2024
First Hearing Date: 19th March 2024
Court Number And Judge: 508-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 01

    Orders

    14
    Interim Order 7Full order available
    22 Sept 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 35 CC NI ACT 2964/2024 Rakesh Arora Vs. Rahul Madhusudhan Thosar 22.09.2026 Present: Complainant in person. Sh. Ritendra Narayan, Ld. Proxy Counsel for complainant. Accused is absent. Ms. Kusum and Sh. Mohd. Mujimmil, Ld. Counsels for accused. Matter is at the stage of CE. Surety bonds of Rs. 1,00,000/- have not been furnished despite directions. Today also, he has failed to appear. Repeatedly, accused has failed to furnish his surety bonds since 03.06.2025.…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 6Full order available
    24 Feb 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 CC NI ACT 2964/2024 Rakesh Arora Vs. Rahul Madhusudhan Thosar 24.02.2026 VC of this court is not working today. Regular Stenographer of this court is on leave today. Present: Sh. Mirtunjay Singh, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Accused in person. Sh. Mohd. Mujmmil and Ms. Kusum , Ld. Counsels for accused. It is submitted by accused side that they have not received the copy of complaint and annexures. Complainant is directed to…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 5
    23 Sept 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 15 CC NI ACT / 2964/2024
Rakesh Arora Vs. Rahul Madhusudhan Thosar
23.09.2025
Regular stenographer of this court is on leave today.
Present: Sh. Anmol chadha, Ld. Counsel for the complainant through VC.
None for the accused.
On LDOH, accused had appeared in the afternoon session and
hence BWs were not issued.
Today also, he has failed to appear.
Accordingly, let bailable warrants in the sum of Rs. 10,000, be
issued against the accused, with one surety of like amount, through the SHO
concerned, on filing of PF within two months, returnable on NDOH.
Complainant submits that he has already supplied the documents of
the complaint.
Surety bonds have also not been furnished.
Put up for appearance of accused/ framing of notice/ furnishing of
1 lakh/ further proceedings on 24.02.2026.
(URVI GUPTA)
J.M.F.C.-01(N.I.Act)/Central,
THC/Delhi/23.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 4Full order available
    03 Jun 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 16 CC NI ACT / 2964/2024 Rakesh Arora Vs. Rahul Madhusudhan Thosar 03.06.2025 The undersigned has been transferred to this court vide order No. 16/DHC/Gaz.IIB/G7/VI.E.2(a)2025, dated 30.05.2025. Present: Sh. Anmol Chadha, Ld. Counsel for the complainant through VC. None for accused. BWs issued against the accused not received back. Be awaited. In the meantime, let fresh bailable warrants in the sum of Rs. 10,000/, be issued against the accused, with one surety of…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 3
    11 Mar 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 57 CC NI ACT / 2964/2024
Rakesh Arora Vs. Rahul Madhusudhan Thosar
11.03.2025
Today, the undersigned is also working as Duty JMFC.
Present: Sh. Anmol Chadha, Ld. Counsel for the complainant through VC.
None for accused.
BWs issued against the accused received back unexecuted due to
arrangement duties.
Let fresh bailable warrants in the sum of Rs. 10,000/, in terms of
previous order, be issued against the accused, with one surety of like amount,
through the SHO concerned, on filing of PF, returnable on NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 03.06.2025.
(ARADHANA)
J.M.F.C.01(N.I.Act)/Central,
THC/Delhi/11.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    10 Dec 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 27 CC NI ACT / 2964/2024
Rakesh Arora Vs. Rahul Madhusudhan Thosar
10.12.2024
Present: Sh. Anmol Chadha, Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
None for accused.
Be awaited till 12:00 p.m.
At 12:00 pm.
Present: Sh. Anmol Chadha, Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
None for accused.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant has filed an affidavit of service
with screen shot of whatsapp chat stating that the summons have been duly
served upon the accused. Taken on record.
In the meantime, let bailable warrants in the sum of Rs. 10,000/,
be issued against the accused, with one surety of like amount, through the SHO
concerned, on filing of PF, returnable on NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 11.03.2025.
(ARADHANA)
J.M.F.C.01(N.I.Act)/Central,
THC/Delhi/10.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    05 Aug 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 51 CC NI ACT / 2964/2024
Rakesh Arora Vs. Rahul Madhusudhan Thosar
05.08.2024
Present: Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
None for accused.
Original postal receipts and tracking report filed on behalf of
complainant indicating that summons not served as addressee has left.
Complainant is directed to furnish fresh address of accused or file
an affidavit verifying the address of accused till the next date of hearing.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant seeks permission to effect the
service upon the accused through electronic modes. It is noted that the summons
were previously also directed to be served through all modes.
Let fresh summons be issued through electronic modes, on filing of
PF for NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 10.12.2024.
(NITISH KUMAR SHARMA)
J.M.F.C.01(N.I.Act)/Central,
THC/Delhi/05.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 7Full order available
    22 Sept 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 35 CC NI ACT 2964/2024 Rakesh Arora Vs. Rahul Madhusudhan Thosar 22.09.2026 Present: Complainant in person. Sh. Ritendra Narayan, Ld. Proxy Counsel for complainant. Accused is absent. Ms. Kusum and Sh. Mohd. Mujimmil, Ld. Counsels for accused. Matter is at the stage of CE. Surety bonds of Rs. 1,00,000/- have not been furnished despite directions. Today also, he has failed to appear. Repeatedly, accused has failed to furnish his surety bonds since 03.06.2025.…

    Read Full Order
    Order 6Full order available
    24 Feb 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 CC NI ACT 2964/2024 Rakesh Arora Vs. Rahul Madhusudhan Thosar 24.02.2026 VC of this court is not working today. Regular Stenographer of this court is on leave today. Present: Sh. Mirtunjay Singh, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Accused in person. Sh. Mohd. Mujmmil and Ms. Kusum , Ld. Counsels for accused. It is submitted by accused side that they have not received the copy of complaint and annexures. Complainant is directed to…

    Read Full Order
    Order 5
    23 Sept 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 15 CC NI ACT / 2964/2024
Rakesh Arora Vs. Rahul Madhusudhan Thosar
23.09.2025
Regular stenographer of this court is on leave today.
Present: Sh. Anmol chadha, Ld. Counsel for the complainant through VC.
None for the accused.
On LDOH, accused had appeared in the afternoon session and
hence BWs were not issued.
Today also, he has failed to appear.
Accordingly, let bailable warrants in the sum of Rs. 10,000, be
issued against the accused, with one surety of like amount, through the SHO
concerned, on filing of PF within two months, returnable on NDOH.
Complainant submits that he has already supplied the documents of
the complaint.
Surety bonds have also not been furnished.
Put up for appearance of accused/ framing of notice/ furnishing of
1 lakh/ further proceedings on 24.02.2026.
(URVI GUPTA)
J.M.F.C.-01(N.I.Act)/Central,
THC/Delhi/23.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4Full order available
    03 Jun 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 16 CC NI ACT / 2964/2024 Rakesh Arora Vs. Rahul Madhusudhan Thosar 03.06.2025 The undersigned has been transferred to this court vide order No. 16/DHC/Gaz.IIB/G7/VI.E.2(a)2025, dated 30.05.2025. Present: Sh. Anmol Chadha, Ld. Counsel for the complainant through VC. None for accused. BWs issued against the accused not received back. Be awaited. In the meantime, let fresh bailable warrants in the sum of Rs. 10,000/, be issued against the accused, with one surety of…

    Read Full Order
    Order 3
    11 Mar 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 57 CC NI ACT / 2964/2024
Rakesh Arora Vs. Rahul Madhusudhan Thosar
11.03.2025
Today, the undersigned is also working as Duty JMFC.
Present: Sh. Anmol Chadha, Ld. Counsel for the complainant through VC.
None for accused.
BWs issued against the accused received back unexecuted due to
arrangement duties.
Let fresh bailable warrants in the sum of Rs. 10,000/, in terms of
previous order, be issued against the accused, with one surety of like amount,
through the SHO concerned, on filing of PF, returnable on NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 03.06.2025.
(ARADHANA)
J.M.F.C.01(N.I.Act)/Central,
THC/Delhi/11.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    10 Dec 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 27 CC NI ACT / 2964/2024
Rakesh Arora Vs. Rahul Madhusudhan Thosar
10.12.2024
Present: Sh. Anmol Chadha, Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
None for accused.
Be awaited till 12:00 p.m.
At 12:00 pm.
Present: Sh. Anmol Chadha, Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
None for accused.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant has filed an affidavit of service
with screen shot of whatsapp chat stating that the summons have been duly
served upon the accused. Taken on record.
In the meantime, let bailable warrants in the sum of Rs. 10,000/,
be issued against the accused, with one surety of like amount, through the SHO
concerned, on filing of PF, returnable on NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 11.03.2025.
(ARADHANA)
J.M.F.C.01(N.I.Act)/Central,
THC/Delhi/10.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    05 Aug 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 51 CC NI ACT / 2964/2024
Rakesh Arora Vs. Rahul Madhusudhan Thosar
05.08.2024
Present: Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
None for accused.
Original postal receipts and tracking report filed on behalf of
complainant indicating that summons not served as addressee has left.
Complainant is directed to furnish fresh address of accused or file
an affidavit verifying the address of accused till the next date of hearing.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant seeks permission to effect the
service upon the accused through electronic modes. It is noted that the summons
were previously also directed to be served through all modes.
Let fresh summons be issued through electronic modes, on filing of
PF for NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 10.12.2024.
(NITISH KUMAR SHARMA)
J.M.F.C.01(N.I.Act)/Central,
THC/Delhi/05.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.