Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 2

CNR DLCT02006262202528 Oct 2025
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 2 · 28 Oct 2025 · CNR DLCT020062622025

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: (Aradhana)
JMFC (NI Act) Digital Court – 04
Central, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi/28.10.2025
60 CC NI ACT / 9168/2025
AKARA CAPITAL ADVISORS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. ASHOK MARIYAPPAN
Proceedings conducted through Video Conferencing via CISCO Webex app.
28.10.2025
Present: Sh. Deepak Gupta, Ld Counsel for the complainant.
Arguments on summoning heard.
Entire record including the complaint and the annexed documents perused
thoroughly.
It is alleged that accused has initiated the electronic funds transfer mandate in
question to the complainant in discharge of liability. However, the same was not executed.
Thereafter, demand notice was sent to the accused by the complainant. Despite service/ deemed
service of said notice, accused has failed to make the payment within 15 days as per provisions
of Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. On consideration of the complaint, annexed
documents and verification affidavit of the complainant, this Court is of the opinion that prima
facie there are sufficient grounds of proceeding against the below mentioned accused for the
offence under Section 25, Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. In terms of inquiry
conducted under Section 202 CrPC, all the statutory requirements have been complied with.
The complaint is filed within the period of limitation. I am satisfied that there are sufficient
grounds for proceeding further.
Let accused be summoned on filing of PF, RC/ Speed Post/ approved Courier
service/ E-mail within 30 days for 24.03.2026. Process server is directed to serve the summons
through all modes.
Complainant is directed to place the tracking report of summons sent through
speed post on record on the next date. In the event the house/office/premises is found to be
locked/refusal to accept the service/any other contingency the process be served through
affixation in terms of Section 65, CrPC. As per the guidelines laid down in Damodar S. Prabhu
Vs. Sayed Babalal H, AIR 2010 (SC) 1907, Ahlmad is directed to make a mention on the
summons issued against the accused (by adding separate sheet, if required) that “accused can
make an application for compounding of the offence at the first and second hearing of the case
and if such an application is made, compounding may be allowed by the Court without
imposing any costs on the accused.”
The order be uploaded as per rules.
In the meantime, matter be referred to upcoming National Lok Adalat to be held
on 13.12.2025 for settlement, if any.
If the matter is not settled, same be put up on the date already fixed.
-- 1 of 1 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.