Income Tax Office (ito)VsNU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS +3 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19 CT. CASES 470/2023
CNR NO. DLCT020059452023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) VS.
NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
24.07.2026
PRESENT: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for complainant.
Sh. S C Jha, Ld. Counsel for A-2.
Matter is listed for pre-charge evidence.
No witness is present.
Ld. SPP has submitted that since the accused has not
cross examined CW-1 in pre-charge evidence and has reserved his
right to cross examine the witness at post charge evidence, no
purpose would be served to examine the remaining witnesses at this
stage.
Vide separately recorded statement of SPP, pre-charge
evidence stands closed.
Be listed for arguments on charge on 22.09.2026.
(RENU CHAUDHARY)
ACJM: (SPECIAL ACTS): CENTRAL
THC: DELHI: 24.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 CT. CASES 470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) VS. NU TEK INDIA LTD AND
27.03.2026
PRESENT: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the
complainant.
Sh. S. C. Jha, Ld Counsel for accused no.2.
CW Sh. Baljeet Singh in person.
An application seeking exemption from personal
appearance of accused no.2 is moved. In view of reason mentioned
in application, accused no.2 is exempted from his personal
appearance in the court for today only with directions to appear
before the Court on next date of hearing.
Matter is listed for pre-charge evidence.
CW-1 examined and discharged.
Put up for remaining pre-charge evidence on
24.07.2026.
(RENU CHAUDHARY)
ACJM: (SPECIAL ACTS): CENTRAL
THC: DELHI: 27.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 23Ct. Cases470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs.
NU TEKINDIA LTD AND ORS
05.12.2025
PRESENT: Sh. Manmeet Singh, Ld. SPP for the complainant.
Accused no.2 not present.
Sh. Ranjan Kumar, Ld. Counsel for RP for accused
no.1 through VC.
Sh. Sharad Chandra Jha, Ld. Counsel for accused
no.2.
Accused no.2 has not appeared and has not furnished
surety bonds despite directions. Exemption sought on medical
grounds, however, no medical documents is placed on record.
Hence, prayer declined.
It also noted that RP of accused no.1 is also not
appearing before the court despite directions.
Hence, bailable warrants in the sum of Rs.20,000/-
each be issued against the RP of accused no. 1 as well as against
accused no.2 with one surety each in like amount, returnable for
next date.
Complainant is directed to call and examine the
witness on next date.
Be listed for pre charge evidence on 27.03.2026.
(date is given as per the request and convenience of both the
parties).
(RENU CHAUDHARY)
ACJM: (SPECIAL ACTS): CENTRAL
THC: DELHI: 05.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 18 Ct. Cases 470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. NU TEK
INDIA LTD AND ORS
26.09.2025
Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the
Complainant.
RP of accused no. 1 absent.
Sh. Sharad Chand Jha, Ld. Counsel for accused no. 2
Accused no 2 present.
Submissions heard on the point of bail. Considering
the submission, accused no. 2 is admitted to bail upon furnishing
bail bond of Rs 50,000/- and surety of like amount. Accused no. 2
furnished personal bond and seeks time to furnish surety bond.
Personal bond are accepted till the NDOH. Accused is directed to
furnish surety bond possitively on the NDOH.
Let bailable warrant be issued against RP of accused
no. 1 in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with the surety like amount
through SHO Subji Mandi for the next date of hearing.
Be put up for pre charge evidence on 05.12.2025.
(Arjinder Kaur )
ACJM: (Special Acts):
Central, THC: Delhi:
26.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13Ct. Cases470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS/2023
22.07.2025
Ld. PO is on Leave today.
Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant present through
VC.
Sh. Vinit Aggarwal, OL for accused No.1.
Sh. Sharad Chand Jha, Ld. Counsel for accused no.2.
Be put up for purpose fixed on 26.09.2025.
(Dr. Rajkumar Singh)
Link JMFC-5: Central District
THC: Delhi:22.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 Ct. Cases 470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
22.04.2025
Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. Special Public Prosecutor
for the Complainant.
Accused No. 2 absent.
Sh. Sharad Chand Jha, Ld. Counsel for accused no. 2.
Sh. Vineet Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for RP of accused no. 1.
Exemption application is moved on the ground that accused
no.2. Considering the exemption, accused no. 2 is exempted for appearance
in the Court only for today.
Accused No. 2 is directed to appear in person without any fail
on the NDOH.
RP of accused no. 1 is directed to file statement / authorization
on the NDOH.
Be put up for appearance of accused no. 2 and bail
proceedings on 22.07.2025.
(Mayank Mittal)
ACJM(Special Acts) : Central District:
THC: Delhi: 22.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Ct. Cases470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs.
NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
25.02.2025
Ld. PO is on leave today.
Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant
through VC.
Sh. Vineet Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for accused through VC
(vakalatnama filed).
Sh. Chitradeep Malik, incumbent AO through VC.
An application is moved for seeking exemption from personal
appearance of accused No.2. Heard. For the reason stated in the application
accused No.2 is exempted from his appearance in the court for today only.
Accused is directed to appear in person without any fail on the next date.
Be put up for purpose fixed on 22.04.2025.
(Dr. Raj Kumar Singh)
Link JMFC : Central District:
THC: Delhi: 25.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 23 Ct. Cases 470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO)
Vs. NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
CNR DLCT02-005945-2023
17.09.2024
Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh, Ld. SPP for the complainant.
Both the accused absent.
It is submitted by Ld. SPP that he will file fresh and correct address of
accused perons during the course of the day.
At this stage, fresh address of accused no.1 & 2 filed. Same is taken on
record.
Ahlmad is directed to issue summons to both the accused at their fresh
address for next date of hearing. In case the service of summons are refused or summons
are unserved for any reason whatsoever, Process Server is directed to affix the copy of
summons at the outer gate of the premises. Complainant is directed to collect the dasti
copy of additional summons and speed post to be served to accused as per rules and to
report on next date of hearing.
Ahlmad is directed to tag the amended memo of parties filed by complainant
at appropriate place.
Put up on 07.01.2025.
(Mayank Mittal)
ACJM(Special Acts) : Central District:
THC: Delhi: 17.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16Ct. Cases470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
CNR No. DLCT02-005945-2023
03.05.2024
Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant.
Both accused absent.
It is submitted by learned SPP that speed post could not be
received dasti in the present matter. Report of Ahlmad shows that speed post
was given dasti. Be that as it may, as in two connected matters, report has
been filed by learned SPP that speed post received back unserved on the same
address of accused No.2 which is mentioned in this case as well. The present
matter is also adjourned for filing fresh and correct address of accused No.2.
Put up for filing fresh and correct address of accused No.2 on
17.09.2024.
(Mayank Mittal)
ACMM (Special Acts): Central District:
THC: Delhi: 03.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16Ct. Cases470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
CNR No. DLCT02-005945-2023
03.05.2024
Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant.
Both accused absent.
It is submitted by learned SPP that speed post could not be
received dasti in the present matter. Report of Ahlmad shows that speed post
was given dasti. Be that as it may, as in two connected matters, report has
been filed by learned SPP that speed post received back unserved on the same
address of accused No.2 which is mentioned in this case as well. The present
matter is also adjourned for filing fresh and correct address of accused No.2.
Put up for filing fresh and correct address of accused No.2 on
17.09.2024.
(Mayank Mittal)
ACMM (Special Acts): Central District:
THC: Delhi: 03.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 470/2023
Income Tax Office Vs.Nu Tek India Ltd & Ors.
CNR No. DLCT02-005945-2023
05.03.2024.
Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for
the complainant.
Accused persons are absent.
Summon isused to accused no. 2 received back
unserved.
It is submitted by Ld. SPP that he has not received
dasti summon in compliance of order dated 28.11.2023.
Let fresh summon be issued to accused no. 2 in
compliance of previous order for NDOH. Let the speed post be
given dasti to the complainant for service as per rules.
Put up for further proceedings on 03.05.2024.
(Mayank Mittal)
ACMM(Special Acts): Central District
THC: Delhi: 05.03.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO)
Vs.
NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
CNR-DLCT02-005945-2023
28.11.2023
Present:- Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant.
None for the accused persons.
Summons sent to the accused persons are not received back. Be awaited.
In the meantime, issue fresh summons to the accused persons on filing of PF & SP
within a month from today returnable for 05.03.2024.
SP be given dasti to the complainant who shall file postal receipts and
tracking reports on the NDOH.
Notice be also served on the respective email IDs of the accused persons
and compliance report be filed by the complainant on the next date.
(Anurag Thakur)
ACMM(Special Acts) : Central District:
THC: Delhi: 28.11.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO)
Vs.
NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
CNR-DLCT02-005945-2023
07.06.2023
Present:- Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant.
Sh. Baljeet Singh, AR of complainant.
Latest Master Data of accused no. 1 is placed on record by complainant.
It appears that accused no. 1 is under liquidation. The complainant is directed to file
the order passed by NCLT qua accused no. 1 admitting it to CIRP or ordering its
liquidation, as the case may be on NDOH i.e. 28.07.2023.
The complainant shall also make submissions qua culpability of accused
no. 3 Amar Sarin on the NDOH. An amended memo of parties be also filed on the
next date.
(Anurag Thakur)
ACMM(Special Acts) : Central District:
THC: Delhi: 07.06.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO)
Vs.
NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
CNR-DLCT02-005945-2023
11.04.2023
Present:- None for the complainant.
No adverse order is being passed against the complainant today.
List for further proceedings on 07.06.2023.
(Anurag Thakur)
ACMM(Special Acts) : Central District:
THC: Delhi: 11.04.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 18 CT. CASES/470/2023
CNR NO. DLCT020059452023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) VS. TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
22.09.2026
PRESENT: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for complainant.
Sh. S C Jha, Ld. Counsel for A-2.
None for A-1.
Matter is listed for arguments on charge.
Arguments heard.
Be listed for clarifications, if any/order on charge on
11.12.2026.
(RENU CHAUDHARY)
ACJM: (SPECIAL ACTS): CENTRAL
THC: DELHI: 22.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19 CT. CASES 470/2023
CNR NO. DLCT020059452023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) VS.
NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
24.07.2026
PRESENT: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for complainant.
Sh. S C Jha, Ld. Counsel for A-2.
Matter is listed for pre-charge evidence.
No witness is present.
Ld. SPP has submitted that since the accused has not
cross examined CW-1 in pre-charge evidence and has reserved his
right to cross examine the witness at post charge evidence, no
purpose would be served to examine the remaining witnesses at this
stage.
Vide separately recorded statement of SPP, pre-charge
evidence stands closed.
Be listed for arguments on charge on 22.09.2026.
(RENU CHAUDHARY)
ACJM: (SPECIAL ACTS): CENTRAL
THC: DELHI: 24.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 CT. CASES 470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) VS. NU TEK INDIA LTD AND
27.03.2026
PRESENT: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the
complainant.
Sh. S. C. Jha, Ld Counsel for accused no.2.
CW Sh. Baljeet Singh in person.
An application seeking exemption from personal
appearance of accused no.2 is moved. In view of reason mentioned
in application, accused no.2 is exempted from his personal
appearance in the court for today only with directions to appear
before the Court on next date of hearing.
Matter is listed for pre-charge evidence.
CW-1 examined and discharged.
Put up for remaining pre-charge evidence on
24.07.2026.
(RENU CHAUDHARY)
ACJM: (SPECIAL ACTS): CENTRAL
THC: DELHI: 27.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 23Ct. Cases470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs.
NU TEKINDIA LTD AND ORS
05.12.2025
PRESENT: Sh. Manmeet Singh, Ld. SPP for the complainant.
Accused no.2 not present.
Sh. Ranjan Kumar, Ld. Counsel for RP for accused
no.1 through VC.
Sh. Sharad Chandra Jha, Ld. Counsel for accused
no.2.
Accused no.2 has not appeared and has not furnished
surety bonds despite directions. Exemption sought on medical
grounds, however, no medical documents is placed on record.
Hence, prayer declined.
It also noted that RP of accused no.1 is also not
appearing before the court despite directions.
Hence, bailable warrants in the sum of Rs.20,000/-
each be issued against the RP of accused no. 1 as well as against
accused no.2 with one surety each in like amount, returnable for
next date.
Complainant is directed to call and examine the
witness on next date.
Be listed for pre charge evidence on 27.03.2026.
(date is given as per the request and convenience of both the
parties).
(RENU CHAUDHARY)
ACJM: (SPECIAL ACTS): CENTRAL
THC: DELHI: 05.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 18 Ct. Cases 470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. NU TEK
INDIA LTD AND ORS
26.09.2025
Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the
Complainant.
RP of accused no. 1 absent.
Sh. Sharad Chand Jha, Ld. Counsel for accused no. 2
Accused no 2 present.
Submissions heard on the point of bail. Considering
the submission, accused no. 2 is admitted to bail upon furnishing
bail bond of Rs 50,000/- and surety of like amount. Accused no. 2
furnished personal bond and seeks time to furnish surety bond.
Personal bond are accepted till the NDOH. Accused is directed to
furnish surety bond possitively on the NDOH.
Let bailable warrant be issued against RP of accused
no. 1 in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with the surety like amount
through SHO Subji Mandi for the next date of hearing.
Be put up for pre charge evidence on 05.12.2025.
(Arjinder Kaur )
ACJM: (Special Acts):
Central, THC: Delhi:
26.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13Ct. Cases470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS/2023
22.07.2025
Ld. PO is on Leave today.
Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant present through
VC.
Sh. Vinit Aggarwal, OL for accused No.1.
Sh. Sharad Chand Jha, Ld. Counsel for accused no.2.
Be put up for purpose fixed on 26.09.2025.
(Dr. Rajkumar Singh)
Link JMFC-5: Central District
THC: Delhi:22.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 Ct. Cases 470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
22.04.2025
Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. Special Public Prosecutor
for the Complainant.
Accused No. 2 absent.
Sh. Sharad Chand Jha, Ld. Counsel for accused no. 2.
Sh. Vineet Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for RP of accused no. 1.
Exemption application is moved on the ground that accused
no.2. Considering the exemption, accused no. 2 is exempted for appearance
in the Court only for today.
Accused No. 2 is directed to appear in person without any fail
on the NDOH.
RP of accused no. 1 is directed to file statement / authorization
on the NDOH.
Be put up for appearance of accused no. 2 and bail
proceedings on 22.07.2025.
(Mayank Mittal)
ACJM(Special Acts) : Central District:
THC: Delhi: 22.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Ct. Cases470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs.
NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
25.02.2025
Ld. PO is on leave today.
Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant
through VC.
Sh. Vineet Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for accused through VC
(vakalatnama filed).
Sh. Chitradeep Malik, incumbent AO through VC.
An application is moved for seeking exemption from personal
appearance of accused No.2. Heard. For the reason stated in the application
accused No.2 is exempted from his appearance in the court for today only.
Accused is directed to appear in person without any fail on the next date.
Be put up for purpose fixed on 22.04.2025.
(Dr. Raj Kumar Singh)
Link JMFC : Central District:
THC: Delhi: 25.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 23 Ct. Cases 470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO)
Vs. NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
CNR DLCT02-005945-2023
17.09.2024
Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh, Ld. SPP for the complainant.
Both the accused absent.
It is submitted by Ld. SPP that he will file fresh and correct address of
accused perons during the course of the day.
At this stage, fresh address of accused no.1 & 2 filed. Same is taken on
record.
Ahlmad is directed to issue summons to both the accused at their fresh
address for next date of hearing. In case the service of summons are refused or summons
are unserved for any reason whatsoever, Process Server is directed to affix the copy of
summons at the outer gate of the premises. Complainant is directed to collect the dasti
copy of additional summons and speed post to be served to accused as per rules and to
report on next date of hearing.
Ahlmad is directed to tag the amended memo of parties filed by complainant
at appropriate place.
Put up on 07.01.2025.
(Mayank Mittal)
ACJM(Special Acts) : Central District:
THC: Delhi: 17.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16Ct. Cases470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
CNR No. DLCT02-005945-2023
03.05.2024
Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant.
Both accused absent.
It is submitted by learned SPP that speed post could not be
received dasti in the present matter. Report of Ahlmad shows that speed post
was given dasti. Be that as it may, as in two connected matters, report has
been filed by learned SPP that speed post received back unserved on the same
address of accused No.2 which is mentioned in this case as well. The present
matter is also adjourned for filing fresh and correct address of accused No.2.
Put up for filing fresh and correct address of accused No.2 on
17.09.2024.
(Mayank Mittal)
ACMM (Special Acts): Central District:
THC: Delhi: 03.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16Ct. Cases470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
CNR No. DLCT02-005945-2023
03.05.2024
Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant.
Both accused absent.
It is submitted by learned SPP that speed post could not be
received dasti in the present matter. Report of Ahlmad shows that speed post
was given dasti. Be that as it may, as in two connected matters, report has
been filed by learned SPP that speed post received back unserved on the same
address of accused No.2 which is mentioned in this case as well. The present
matter is also adjourned for filing fresh and correct address of accused No.2.
Put up for filing fresh and correct address of accused No.2 on
17.09.2024.
(Mayank Mittal)
ACMM (Special Acts): Central District:
THC: Delhi: 03.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 470/2023
Income Tax Office Vs.Nu Tek India Ltd & Ors.
CNR No. DLCT02-005945-2023
05.03.2024.
Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for
the complainant.
Accused persons are absent.
Summon isused to accused no. 2 received back
unserved.
It is submitted by Ld. SPP that he has not received
dasti summon in compliance of order dated 28.11.2023.
Let fresh summon be issued to accused no. 2 in
compliance of previous order for NDOH. Let the speed post be
given dasti to the complainant for service as per rules.
Put up for further proceedings on 03.05.2024.
(Mayank Mittal)
ACMM(Special Acts): Central District
THC: Delhi: 05.03.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO)
Vs.
NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
CNR-DLCT02-005945-2023
28.11.2023
Present:- Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant.
None for the accused persons.
Summons sent to the accused persons are not received back. Be awaited.
In the meantime, issue fresh summons to the accused persons on filing of PF & SP
within a month from today returnable for 05.03.2024.
SP be given dasti to the complainant who shall file postal receipts and
tracking reports on the NDOH.
Notice be also served on the respective email IDs of the accused persons
and compliance report be filed by the complainant on the next date.
(Anurag Thakur)
ACMM(Special Acts) : Central District:
THC: Delhi: 28.11.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO)
Vs.
NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
CNR-DLCT02-005945-2023
07.06.2023
Present:- Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant.
Sh. Baljeet Singh, AR of complainant.
Latest Master Data of accused no. 1 is placed on record by complainant.
It appears that accused no. 1 is under liquidation. The complainant is directed to file
the order passed by NCLT qua accused no. 1 admitting it to CIRP or ordering its
liquidation, as the case may be on NDOH i.e. 28.07.2023.
The complainant shall also make submissions qua culpability of accused
no. 3 Amar Sarin on the NDOH. An amended memo of parties be also filed on the
next date.
(Anurag Thakur)
ACMM(Special Acts) : Central District:
THC: Delhi: 07.06.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 470/2023
INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO)
Vs.
NU TEK INDIA LTD AND ORS
CNR-DLCT02-005945-2023
11.04.2023
Present:- None for the complainant.
No adverse order is being passed against the complainant today.
List for further proceedings on 07.06.2023.
(Anurag Thakur)
ACMM(Special Acts) : Central District:
THC: Delhi: 11.04.2023
-- 1 of 1 --