AMIT KUMAR YADAVVsSANTOSH KUMAR

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 4 Ct. Cases / 213/2026
Amit Kumar Yadav Vs. Santosh Kumar
(Roop Nagar)
01.07.2026
Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
IO/SI Harshit Apoorv in person.
Complainant in person.
Status report filed, according to which some more time
is required for filing of conclusive ATR. Copy supplied.
Conclusive ATR be filed on or before the NDOH.
Re-list the matter for 15.09.2026.
(Ms. Rashi Raheja)
JMFC-13, Central/THC
Delhi/01.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 Ct. Cases / 213/2026
Amit Kumar Yadav Vs. Santosh Kumar
(Roop Nagar)
11.05.2026
Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
ATR received, according to which, SI Rahul Garg, the
previous IO has been transferred to PS Kotwali and the present case
has been recently marked to SI Harshit Apoorva.
Let ATR be called from concerned IO/SI Harshit in the
present matter, returnable on NDOH.
Re-list the matter on 01.07.2026.
(Ms. Rashi Raheja)
JMFC-13, Central/THC
Delhi/11.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8 Ct. Cases / 213/2026
Amit Kumar Yadav Vs. Santosh Kumar
(Roop Nagar)
06.02.2026
The undersigned is also working as Duty JMFC today.
Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
Heard. Perused.
Let ATR be called from concerned SHO for
explaining the following points specifically.
1. Whether compliant was received in police station?
2. Whether complaint was received in the office of DCP?
3. Whether the complaint discloses commission of cognizable
offence and whether any action has been taken by the police
on the complaint?
4. Whether there is any delay in the filing of complaint?
5. Whether, if no cognizable offence has been made out, the
complainant has been informed accordingly or not?
Copy of the complaint alongwith Annexure be
supplied to the Naib Court concerned today itself.
Reply shall be filed in point wise manner addressing
each query of the Court as raised above.
Re-list the matter on 11.05.2026.
(Ms. Rashi Raheja)
JMFC-13, Central/THC
Delhi/06.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3 Ct. Cases / 213/2026
Amit Kumar Yadav Vs. Santosh Kumar
(Roop Nagar)
15.09.2026
Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
ATR filed. Copy supplied.
Re-list the matter for arguments on application u/s
156(3) Cr.PC on 18.11.2026.
(Ms. Rashi Raheja)
JMFC-13, Central/THC
Delhi/15.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 4 Ct. Cases / 213/2026
Amit Kumar Yadav Vs. Santosh Kumar
(Roop Nagar)
01.07.2026
Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
IO/SI Harshit Apoorv in person.
Complainant in person.
Status report filed, according to which some more time
is required for filing of conclusive ATR. Copy supplied.
Conclusive ATR be filed on or before the NDOH.
Re-list the matter for 15.09.2026.
(Ms. Rashi Raheja)
JMFC-13, Central/THC
Delhi/01.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 Ct. Cases / 213/2026
Amit Kumar Yadav Vs. Santosh Kumar
(Roop Nagar)
11.05.2026
Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
ATR received, according to which, SI Rahul Garg, the
previous IO has been transferred to PS Kotwali and the present case
has been recently marked to SI Harshit Apoorva.
Let ATR be called from concerned IO/SI Harshit in the
present matter, returnable on NDOH.
Re-list the matter on 01.07.2026.
(Ms. Rashi Raheja)
JMFC-13, Central/THC
Delhi/11.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8 Ct. Cases / 213/2026
Amit Kumar Yadav Vs. Santosh Kumar
(Roop Nagar)
06.02.2026
The undersigned is also working as Duty JMFC today.
Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
Heard. Perused.
Let ATR be called from concerned SHO for
explaining the following points specifically.
1. Whether compliant was received in police station?
2. Whether complaint was received in the office of DCP?
3. Whether the complaint discloses commission of cognizable
offence and whether any action has been taken by the police
on the complaint?
4. Whether there is any delay in the filing of complaint?
5. Whether, if no cognizable offence has been made out, the
complainant has been informed accordingly or not?
Copy of the complaint alongwith Annexure be
supplied to the Naib Court concerned today itself.
Reply shall be filed in point wise manner addressing
each query of the Court as raised above.
Re-list the matter on 11.05.2026.
(Ms. Rashi Raheja)
JMFC-13, Central/THC
Delhi/06.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --