Interim Order 17

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 Cr. Case 1065/2024
STATE Vs. RAGHAV KALRA
104/2023 (Roop Nagar)
04.06.2026
Present: Mr. Manish Bansal, Ld. APP for the State.
Mr. Mudit Sharma, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the accused Nitin
Accused Nitin and Raghav in person.
Accused Renu Kalra produced from JC from Jail No.
6/Tihar Jail (bail granted, bail bond not furnished).
Matter is pending for consideration on point of charge against
the accused persons. Arguments qua accused Nitin had already been heard
and with respect to the remaining accused persons right to argue on charge
was closed vide order dt. 13.05.2026. Record perused. As per the charge
sheet, the accused persons have been charged for offence u/s
420/467/468/471/34/120B IPC.
With respect to Section 467/468/471 IPC, it is important for
the prosecution to show that a forged document was prepared whereas, the
alleged forged documents were prepared by the accused persons in their
names only and therefore, there is no forgery. The signature on the document
i.e. Gift Deed which is stated to be forged has not been matched with
specimen signatures obtained of the accused as there is no supplementary
charge sheet qua FSL result pertaining to the signatures. Therefore, the
prosecution has failed to show a prima facie case of forgery against the
accused persons or using of that forged document for the purpose of cheating
therefore, accused persons are discharged for offence u/s 467/468/471 IPC.
However, there are specific allegations of cheating by selling
properties which were either non-existent or which did not belong to the
accused persons in furtherance of their common intention. Therefore, a prima
facie case against all the accused persons for cheating with common
intention/with prior meeting of mind is made out. Hence, the accused persons
are charged for offence u/s 420/34/120B IPC.
Re-list the matter for formal framing of charge on 02.07.2026
(Ms. Rashi Raheja)
JMFC-13, Central/THC
Delhi/04.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --