Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

VINAYAK REMEDIES LIMITEDVsSatvik Drug Agency

CNR DLCT020021852026810-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 08
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
1033/2026
Registration Date
16 Jan 2026
Next Hearing Date
16 Nov 2026
Case Stage
Arguments

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Pahar Ganj
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 30-04-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 07-07-2026
    
    Date: 07-07-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 16-11-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 2185/2026
    Filing Date: 13-01-2026
    eFiling Number: ADL20230013991C202600002
    eFiling Date: 08-01-2026
    First Hearing Date: 30th April 2026
    Court Number And Judge: 810-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 08

    Orders

    4
    Interim Order 2
    07 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: (Garima Garg)
    JMFC (NI Act)-08,
    Central, THC, Delhi 07.07.2026
    64 CC NI ACT / 1033/2026
    Vinayak Remedies Limited Vs. Satvik Drug Agency
    07.07.2026
    Present: Ms. Shree, Ld. Counsel for the complainant (through VC).
    Matter is listed for arguments on cognizance.
    Original complaint alongwith documents has already been filed. The same has been
    confirmed by the Reader of this court. Be taken on record.
    Perusal of the record shows that the complainant has mentioned in his complaint
    that the accused no. 1 is a proprietorship firm and accused no. 2 is its proprietor.
    Further perusal of the record reveals that the GST details of the accused firm
    furnished by the complainant itself reflects that the accused no. 1 is a partnership firm and not a
    proprietorship firm. It is also not clear as to who are the partners of the accused no. 1 firm.
    Ld. Counsel for the complainant is directed to provide clarification with respect
    to the same and take appropriate steps.
    Be listed on 16/11/2026.
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    30 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 43 CC NI ACT / 1033/2026
    Vinayak Remedies Limited Vs. Satvik Drug Agency
    30.04.2026
    Ld. Presiding Officer is on maternity leave.
    Present: Ms. Shree, Ld. Counsel for the complainant (through VC).
    Fresh complaint received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as
    per rules.
    Be put up on 07/07/2026.
    (Mayank Gupta)
    Reliever JMFC,
    Central, THC, Delhi 30.04.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    07 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: (Garima Garg)
    JMFC (NI Act)-08,
    Central, THC, Delhi 07.07.2026
    64 CC NI ACT / 1033/2026
    Vinayak Remedies Limited Vs. Satvik Drug Agency
    07.07.2026
    Present: Ms. Shree, Ld. Counsel for the complainant (through VC).
    Matter is listed for arguments on cognizance.
    Original complaint alongwith documents has already been filed. The same has been
    confirmed by the Reader of this court. Be taken on record.
    Perusal of the record shows that the complainant has mentioned in his complaint
    that the accused no. 1 is a proprietorship firm and accused no. 2 is its proprietor.
    Further perusal of the record reveals that the GST details of the accused firm
    furnished by the complainant itself reflects that the accused no. 1 is a partnership firm and not a
    proprietorship firm. It is also not clear as to who are the partners of the accused no. 1 firm.
    Ld. Counsel for the complainant is directed to provide clarification with respect
    to the same and take appropriate steps.
    Be listed on 16/11/2026.
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    30 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 43 CC NI ACT / 1033/2026
    Vinayak Remedies Limited Vs. Satvik Drug Agency
    30.04.2026
    Ld. Presiding Officer is on maternity leave.
    Present: Ms. Shree, Ld. Counsel for the complainant (through VC).
    Fresh complaint received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as
    per rules.
    Be put up on 07/07/2026.
    (Mayank Gupta)
    Reliever JMFC,
    Central, THC, Delhi 30.04.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.