TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026
Not available
Date: 24-01-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 18-02-2026 Date: 18-02-2026 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 04-04-2026 Date: 04-04-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 12-08-2026 Date: 12-08-2026 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2026
Filing Number: 2036/2026 Filing Date: 13-01-2026 eFiling Number: ADL20230004928C202600005 eFiling Date: 07-01-2026 First Hearing Date: 24th January 2026 Court Number And Judge: 511-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NI ACT) - 02
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 37 Cc NI ACT / 1076/2026 Neeraj Sahu Vs. Dhanraj Rameshbhai Joshi /0 (Lahori Gate) 38 Cc NI ACT / 1077/2026 Neeraj Sahu Vs. Dhanraj Rameshbhai Joshi /0 (Lahori Gate) 39 Cc NI ACT / 1078/2026 Neeraj Sahu Vs. Dhanraj Rameshbhai Joshi /0 (Lahori Gate) 40 Cc NI ACT / 1079/2026 Neeraj Sahu Vs. Dhanraj Rameshbhai Joshi /0 (Lahori Gate) 41 Cc NI ACT / 1080/2026 Neeraj Sahu Vs. Dhanraj Rameshbhai Joshi /0…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 19 CC NI ACT / 1079/2026 Neeraj Sahu Vs. Dhanraj Rameshbhai Joshi /0 (Lahori Gate) 04.04.2026 Present: Sh. Sumit Kumar Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the complainant through VC. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Affidavit in terms of last order has been filed. Perused. Accordingly, arguments heard on point of summoning. Following the law laid down in A. C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (2014) 11 SCC 790 and…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 50 CC NI ACT No. 1079/2026 Neeraj Sahu Vs. Dhanraj Rameshbhai Joshi 18.02.2026 Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present: Sh. Nikhil Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the complainant through VC. In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage. Hence, appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with. Perusal of the record reveals that tracking report regarding service of legal demand notice sent to the proposed accused has not been annexed. Accordingly, complainant is directed to file tracking report / affidavit of proof of service of the legal demand notice to the proposed accused on or before NDOH in view of judgment ie. HDFC Vs. Amit Kumar, AIR 2010(NOC) 407 (DEL.), 2010 of Hon’ble High Court. Be put up on 04.04.2026. (Navdeep Gupta) JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central THC/Delhi/18.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 37 Cc NI ACT / 1076/2026 Neeraj Sahu Vs. Dhanraj Rameshbhai Joshi /0 (Lahori Gate) 38 Cc NI ACT / 1077/2026 Neeraj Sahu Vs. Dhanraj Rameshbhai Joshi /0 (Lahori Gate) 39 Cc NI ACT / 1078/2026 Neeraj Sahu Vs. Dhanraj Rameshbhai Joshi /0 (Lahori Gate) 40 Cc NI ACT / 1079/2026 Neeraj Sahu Vs. Dhanraj Rameshbhai Joshi /0 (Lahori Gate) 41 Cc NI ACT / 1080/2026 Neeraj Sahu Vs. Dhanraj Rameshbhai Joshi /0…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 19 CC NI ACT / 1079/2026 Neeraj Sahu Vs. Dhanraj Rameshbhai Joshi /0 (Lahori Gate) 04.04.2026 Present: Sh. Sumit Kumar Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the complainant through VC. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Affidavit in terms of last order has been filed. Perused. Accordingly, arguments heard on point of summoning. Following the law laid down in A. C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (2014) 11 SCC 790 and…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 50 CC NI ACT No. 1079/2026 Neeraj Sahu Vs. Dhanraj Rameshbhai Joshi 18.02.2026 Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present: Sh. Nikhil Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the complainant through VC. In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage. Hence, appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with. Perusal of the record reveals that tracking report regarding service of legal demand notice sent to the proposed accused has not been annexed. Accordingly, complainant is directed to file tracking report / affidavit of proof of service of the legal demand notice to the proposed accused on or before NDOH in view of judgment ie. HDFC Vs. Amit Kumar, AIR 2010(NOC) 407 (DEL.), 2010 of Hon’ble High Court. Be put up on 04.04.2026. (Navdeep Gupta) JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central THC/Delhi/18.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
