Interim Order 1

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 53 CC NI ACT No. 1782/2026
TEKNODOME INDIA PVT LTD Vs. MRS SATYABHAMAV PROPRIETOR OF
PROPRITORSHIP FIRM M/S VB VENTURES
23.02.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules.
Present: Sh. Nikhil Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the complainant through VC.
This is a fresh case.
In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in
“Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no
requirement to issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the
pre-cognizance stage. Hence, appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with.
Perusal of the record reveals that legal demand notice sent to the proposed
accused returned to the sender. However, Ld. Counsel for complainant submits that the
same has been sent at the last known address of the proposed accused.
Accordingly, complainant is directed to file affidavit of proof of service of
the legal demand notice to the proposed accused on or before NDOH in view of
judgment ie. HDFC Vs. Amit Kumar, AIR 2010(NOC) 407 (DEL.), 2010 of Hon’ble
High Court. Be put up on
Put up for consideration on 04.04.2026.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central
THC/Delhi/23.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --