Order 3

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr. Case No. 445/2025
STATE Vs. RITIK KHANDELWAL
Fir No.218/2024
PS: (Crime Branch-Central Delhi)
03.04.2025
Present. Sh. Salil Maheshwari, Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Nandkishore, Anand Jain, Rohit Aggarwal and
Sanjay Bansal produced from JC.
Accused Ritik Khandelwal ,Krishan Goyal and Ashwani
are in person (on court bail)
Sh. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for accused
Ashwani @ Ashu, Krishan Goyal, Nand Kishore and
Rohit Aggarwal
Sh. Anand Kumar Dubey (via VC) and Ms. Harsha
Sharma, Ld. Counsel for accused Anand Jain.
Sh. Rakesh Sharma, and Sh. Anurag Purohit, Ld. Counsel
for accused Sanjay Bansal.
Sh. Abhishek Singh, ld. Counsel for Amul through VC.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of accused Sanjay
Bansal. Same is taken on record.
Arguments on charge heard on behalf of the accused
Rohit and part arguments heard on behalf of the accused Ritik
Khandelwal.
Be put up for remaining arguments on behalf of the
accused Ritik Khandelwal and arguments on behalf of other accused
persons on 16.04.2025.
At this stage, it is pertinent to note that during the course
of the proceedings, the counsel Sh. Anand Kumar Dubey has objected
to the arguments being addressed by Sh. Abhishek Singh, who is
counsel for Amul and is only a witness in the case.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Since, the matter pertains to the violation of the products
of the Amul and taking into account, the technicalities revolving
around the facts of the case, I am of the opinion that there will be no
prejudice to the accused if Sh. Abhishek Singh assist the court on
certain technical points and Ld. APP for the State has no objection to
the same as the ultimate objective of the proceedings is proper
adjudication after assessing all relevant points and angles.
(ABHISHEK KUMAR)
CJM/(Central)/THC/Delhi
03.04.2025
-- 2 of 2 --