Full Order Text
Interim Order 32 · 20 Feb 2026 · CNR DLCT010169072024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 3 CS (COMM) 1176/24 M/s. M.L.J AND SONS Vs. BAJAJ KAGAJ LTD. 20.02.2026 Present : Sh. Divyansh Tyagi, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Kapil Midha, Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC. Ld. Counsels submitted that two applications one filed by plaintiff u/o XI Rule 1 r/w Sec.151 CPC and the other is filed by the defendant u/sec. 151 CPC for treating the issue of territorial jurisdiction as preliminary issue are pending. Arguments heard on application u/o XI Rule 1(5) r/w Sec.151 CPC. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submitted that the plaintiff has annexed all the relevant documents along-with his plaint to pove his case except ie. commission bills/invoices, Commission Report and TDS Certificate of Financial year 2017- 18 & 2018-19. That the defendant in his Written Statement took the objection that the plaintiff has deliberately not filed any invoices, hence, these documents are very much necessary for just and proper adjudication of this present case. That irreparable loss and injury shall ocassion in case the documents are not taken on record. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff relies upon Order XI Rule 1 (c) CPC and submits that the exception has been carved in respect of documents relevant only to answer to any case set up by the defendant subsequent to the filing of the plaint. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has relied upon judgement of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi -- 1 of 3 -- in M/s. Ananya Space Design and Consultants &Anr. v. M/s. Ranjit Interior in CMM No.1043/2025 and submits that the issues were settled on 15.4.2024 and the application is filed on 02.11.2024, however, the application has been filed prior to the commencement of the trial though after the framing of the issues as PW1 has been examined in chief only on 30.01.2025. Ld. Counsel for the defendant on the other hand submitted that the application is an abuse of process of law and has been filed at a belated stage merely to impede the present proceedings. That the plaintiff is trying to set up a new case which is neither pleaded nor set up in the plaint. That the documents sought to be filed now were well within the power, possession, control and custody of the plaintiff and the plaintiff deliberately chose not to file said documents with plaint or with the replication and it has not been disclosed in the application as to why the said documents were not filed at any prior stage. That there is no reasonable cause for non-disclosure of these additional documents earlier. Even otherwise, the documents have no relevance or bearing upon the adjudication of the present suit. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has drawn attention of the Court to Order XI Rule 1 (5) CPC and relied upon judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in M/s. Ananya Space Design and Consultants &Anr. v. M/s. Ranjit Interior (in CMM No.1043/2025). Heard. The plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant an amount of Rs.27,06,403/- on a set of facts that the plaintiff is a -- 2 of 3 -- partnership firm duly registered and was providing parties/clients to the defendant on commission basis from the year 2018 onwards till April, 2022 and the defendant has been making payment regularly by cheque as well as through account transfer. Later on, the defendant started lingering on payment due setting up new excuse each time, when the plaintiff requested for the balance payment, stating that they were under some financial difficulty. That the plaitniff is entitled to recover an amount Rs.27,06,403/- due on the defendants regarding the commision. The plaintiff in support filed the ledger account. Now the plaintiff seeks leave to file the invoices, commission reports, TDS Certificates in support as additional documents. Let the plaintiff be present in person to answer the querry of the Court as to why these invoices and documents were not produced alongwith the plaint when these were clearly in custody and power of the plaintiff, as the Ld. proxy Counsel requires instructions in the matter after arguing for 15 minutes. For further consideration, put up on 03.3.2026. (Neelofer Abida Perveen) District Judge (Commercial Court)-01 Central District/THC/Delhi/20.02.2026 SN -- 3 of 3 --
