Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 1 IN THE COURT OF SH. RAKESH PANDIT, DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL)-13, CENTRAL/TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHI DLCT010165012024 OMP (COMM) No. 94/2024 M/s Shiv Brother’s Through Sh. Raj Kumar, Contractor 5264, Bharat Nagar, Paharganj, New Delhi-110055. …..Petitioner VERSUS 1 Rajya Sabha Secretariat Through Addl. Director Parliament House Annexe, New Delhi-1. …..Respondent 2 Sunil Mishra Sole Arbitrator Former Joint Secretary, Govt. of India, New Delhi. ….. Performa Respondent Date of institution : 19.10.2024 Date when order…
M/S SHIV BROTHERVsRAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT
TrustJury record updated 14 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 94/2024
- Registration Date
- 19 Oct 2024
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 19-10-2024 Business: MISC Next Purpose: Consideration Next Hearing Date: 21-10-2024 Date: 21-10-2024 Business: MISC Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 06-12-2024 Date: 06-12-2024 Business: reply / argument on petition Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 18-01-2025 Date: 18-01-2025 Business: purpose fixed Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 22-02-2025 Date: 22-02-2025 Business: adjourned Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 22-03-2025 Date: 22-03-2025 Business: Proceedings done. Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 26-04-2025 Date: 26-04-2025 Business: Notice issued to Ld. Arbitrator not received back. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 03-06-2025 Date: 03-06-2025 Business: Rejonder / replication filed through e mode. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 26-07-2025 Date: 26-07-2025 Business: A notice of the Ld. Arbitrator stands duly served. But not present. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 21-08-2025 Date: 21-08-2025 Business: Arbitral record has not been received. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 20-09-2025 Date: 20-09-2025 Business: Ld. Arbitrator has sought time to trace out the original arbitral record. . Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 28-10-2025 Date: 28-10-2025 Business: Ld. counsel appearing on behalf of arbitrator / respondent no. 2 states that she will file her VN. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 27-11-2025 Date: 27-11-2025 Business: Some more time is being requested on behalf of Respondent no. 1 for tracing out the original arbitral record. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 08-01-2026 Date: 08-01-2026 Business: Ld. counsel for respondent no. 1 submits that despite their best efforts they have not been able to trace out original record. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 13-02-2026 Date: 13-02-2026 Business: Part arguments heard. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 13-03-2026 Date: 13-03-2026 Business: Adjournment sought on behalf of respondent. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 21-04-2026 Date: 21-04-2026 Business: Again time sought by respondent. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 28-04-2026 Date: 28-04-2026 Business: Cost Deposited. VN filed. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 05-05-2026 Date: 05-05-2026 Business: Argument heard on petition. Next Purpose: Order Next Hearing Date: 15-05-2026 Date: 15-05-2026 Business: Vide separate order announced and dictated in open court, the petition under section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 15-05-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 10329/2024 Filing Date: 18-10-2024 eFiling Number: ADL20230000544C202400019 eFiling Date: 15-10-2024 First Hearing Date: 19th October 2024 Decision Date: 15th May 2026 Court Number And Judge: 806-DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT) - 13, CENTRAL, THC
Orders
38Final Order 2015 May 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) No. 94/24 M/S Shiv Brother Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat 15.05.2026 Present: None for petitioner. Sh. Vishal Mehgwal proxy counsel for Sh. Jagdish Chandra Solanki Ld. Standing Counsel for respondent (through VC). Sh. Sanjiv Kumar, ASO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Vide separate order announced and dictated in open court, the petition u/sec.34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act filed by petitioner is allowed. Award proceedings/file be sent back to Ld. Arbitrator, as per procedure with copy of this order. Original documents, if any, be released to the rightful claimant, as per procedure. Copy of order be issued to all the parties through email or hard copy be provided physically. File be consigned to Record Room. (Rakesh Pandit) District Judge (Commercial Court)-13/ Central/Tis Hazari/Delhi/15.05.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1805 May 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) No. 94/24 M/S Shiv Brother Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat 05.05.2026 Present: Ms. Ritika, proxy counsel for Sh. Anil Chhabra Ld. counsel for petitioner. Sh. Jagdish Chandra Solanki Ld. Standing Counsel for respondent (through VC). Sh. Sanjiv Kumar, ASO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Sh. Raj Kumar for petitioner present in person. Arguments heard on petition u/sec 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Put up for orders on 15.05.2026. Parties are at liberty to file written submissions before NDOH. (Rakesh Pandit) District Judge (Commercial Court)-13/ Central/Tis Hazari/Delhi/05.05.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1728 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) No. 94/24 M/S Shiv Brother Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat 28.04.2026 Present: Sh. Anil Chhabra Ld. counsel for petitioner (through VC). Sh. Prashant Kumar Ld. Counsel for defendant Jagdish Chandra. Sh. Sanjiv Kumar, ASO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Sh. Raj Kumar for petitioner present in person. Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent. An application for waiver of cost filed on behalf fo respondent. Heard. No ground exists. Dismissed. Cost of Rs.2,000/- deposited. Receipt placed on record. Time sought to file reply to the petition. In the interest of justice granted. Put up for reply, if any, and arguments on petition u/sec.34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act on 05.05.2026. (Rakesh Pandit) District Judge (Commercial Court)-13/ Central/Tis Hazari/Delhi/28.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1621 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) No. 94/24 M/S Shiv Brother Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat 21.04.2026 Present: Ms. Ritika proxy counsel for Sh. Anil Chhabra with petitioner. Sh. Sanjiv Kumar, ASO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Again time sought by respondent to argue the objections petition u/sec.34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act on the similar ground that new counsel is not appointed. In the interest of justice last and final opportunity is granted to the respondent but subject to cost of Rs.2,000/- to be deposited with DLSA, Central, THC. Put up for arguments on objections petition u/sec.34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act on 28.04.2026. (Rakesh Pandit) District Judge (Commercial Court)-13/ Central/Tis Hazari/Delhi/21.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1513 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM) No. 94/24 M/S Shiv Brother Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat 13.03.2026 Present: Ms. Ritika proxy counsel for Sh. Anil Chhabra with petitioner. Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Adjourment sought on behalf of respondent on the ground that a new counsel is to be appointed as the tenure of old advocate is over. At request, put up on 21.04.2026 for further proceedings. (Rakesh Pandit) District Judge (Commercial Court)-13/ Central/Tis Hazari/Delhi/13.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1413 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) No.94/24 M/S Shiv Brother Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat 13.02.2026 Present: Sh. Anil Chhabra Ld. counsel for petitioner through VC. Ms. Ritika proxy counsel for Sh. Anil Chhabra with petitioner. Sh. Sandeep Kumar Mohapatra Ld. counsel for respondent no. 1 through VC. Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1. Respondent no.2 is a performa party being the Ld. Arbitrator. Part arguments heard on petition u/sec.34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act. At request, put up for further arguments on petition u/sec.34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act on 13.03.2026. (Rakesh Pandit) District Judge (Commercial Court)13/ Central/Tis Hazari/Delhi/13.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 08.01.2026 Present: Ms. Ritik, Ld. Proxy Counsel for petitioner along with petitioner Sh. Raj Kumar. Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 through VC. Sh. Ashutosh Awasthi, Under Secretary, Sh. Ishwar Chandra Sahoo, AEO and Sh. Sanjiv Kumar, ASO on behalf of respondent no. 1. Respondent no.2 is a performa party being the Ld. Arbitrator. Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 1 submits…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 08.01.2026 Present: Ms. Ritik, Ld. Proxy Counsel for petitioner along with petitioner Sh. Raj Kumar. Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 through VC. Sh. Ashutosh Awasthi, Under Secretary, Sh. Ishwar Chandra Sahoo, AEO and Sh. Sanjiv Kumar, ASO on behalf of respondent no. 1. Respondent no.2 is a performa party being the Ld. Arbitrator. Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 1 submits…
Interim Order 1127 Nov 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.)94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 27.11.2025 Present: Ms. Ritika, Ld. Proxy Counsel for petitioner. Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 1. Ms. Aditi Jha, Ld. Counsel for Arbitrator /Respondent no. 2. Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO and Sh. Rahul Mehra, SSA from Rajya Sabha Secretariat/respondent no. 1. Some more time is being requested on behalf of respondent no. 1 for tracing out the original arbitral record from the office of Rajya Sabha Secretariat. List the matter now on 08.01.2026 for above purpose as well as arguments. (M. K. Nagpal) District Judge, Commercial Court-13 Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/27.11.2025 (p) -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1020 Sept 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 20.09.2025 Present: Sh. Anil Kumar Chabbra, Ld. Counsel for petitioner through VC. Sh. Raj Kumar on behalf of plaintiff firm in person. Sh. Sandeep Mahapatra, Ld. Standing Counsel and Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1. Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO & Sh. Rahul Mehra, SA from respondent no.1. Ld. Arbitrator/respondent no.2 in person. Dasti notice of Ld. Arbitrator/respondent no.2 has been brought on behalf of petitioner as served. Though Ld. Arbitrator has brought some documents, but the same are observed to be photocopies of few of the documents forming part of arbitral record. He states that he is not able to trace out the original arbitral record and except the above documents, no other documents could be traced out by him. Ld. Arbitrator is being given time till next date to trace out the original arbitral record and to file it in the court. List the matter now on 28.10.2025 for above said purpose/arguments. (M. K. Nagpal) District Judge, Commercial Court-13 Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/20.09.2025(s) -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.)94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 21.08.2025 Present: None for petitioner. Sh. Sandeep Mahapatra, Ld. Standing Counsel and Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld Counsel for respondent no. 1 through VC. Respondent no. 2 being the Ld. Arbitrator is a proforma party. Sh. Mahesh Baluni, EO and Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO are present. Though re-joinder by petitioner to the reply filed by respondent no. 1 to this petition has not been filed,…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 8OMP (COMM.)94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 26.07.2025 Present: Sh. Anil Kumar Chabbra, Ld. Counsel for petitioner through VC. Sh. Sandeep Mahapatra, Ld. Standing Counsel (through VC) and Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 1. Respondent no. 2 being the Ld. Arbitrator is a proforma party. A notice of the Ld. Arbitrator stands duly served for today, but still he has not cared to sent the complete arbitral record…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 12 OMP (COMM.) 94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 03.06.2025 Present: Sh. Kaartik Chhabra, Ld. Proxy Counsel for petitioner. Sh. Sandeep Mahapatra, Ld. Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 through VC and Sh. Tribhuvan, Advocate, along with Sh. Mahesh Balvni, EO & Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO, are present physically in court. Respondent no.2 being the Ld. Arbitrator is a proforma party. Rejoinder/replication on behalf of petitioner to the reply of respondent…
Interim Order 626 Apr 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 26.04.2025 Present: Sh. Raj Kumar on behalf petitioner along with Ld. Proxy Counsel Sh. Saurabh Pundir. Sh. Sandeep Mahapatra, Ld. Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 through VC and Sh. Tribhuvan, Advocate, along with Sh. Mahesh Balvni, EO & Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO, are present physically in court. Respondent no.2 being the Ld. Arbitrator is a proforma party. Rejoinder on behalf of petitioner to the reply of respondent no.1 has not been filed and it is stated that the same shall be filed during course of the day. Let the same be filed and a copy thereof be also supplied to the other counsel. Notice was also issued for today to the Ld. Arbitrator summoning the complete arbitral record, but the process has not been received back. Let the process be repeated and it may also be taken dasti to be served by petitioner. At joint request, list the matter now 03.06.2025 awaiting filing of rejoinder as well as for arguments. (M. K. Nagpal) District Judge, Commercial Court-13 Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/26.04.2025(s) -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.)94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 22.03.2025 Present: Sh. Kartik Chabbra, Ld. Proxy Counsel for petitioner through VC and Sh. Raj Kumar on behalf petitioner present physically. Sh. Sandeep Mahapatra, Ld. Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 through VC and Sh. Tribhuvan, Advocate, along with Sh. Mahesh Balvni, EO & Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO, are present physically in court. Respondent no.2 being the Ld. Arbitrator is a proforma party. Reply…
Interim Order 418 Jan 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.)94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 18.01.2025 Present: Sh. Saurabh Pundir, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Sh. Sandeep Kumar Maha Patra with Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld. Counsels for respondent no. 1 with Sh. Mahesh Baluni (AEO), Sh. I. C. Sahoo, (AEO) and Sh. Ngendra Kumar (AEO). Fresh vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 1 stands already filed through e-mode and hard copy thereof has been placed on record today. Arbitral record has not been received as the address of Ld. arbitrator/respondent no. 2 is reported to be incomplete. Let the complete address of Ld. arbitrator be furnished and steps be taken again within a week for summoning the arbitral record from him for next date. Put up on 22.02.2025 awaiting arbitral record as well as reply/objections, if any, as last opportunity and arguments on the point of limitation. (M. K. Nagpal) District Judge, Commercial Court-13 Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/18.01.2025(p) -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 306 Dec 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 06.12.2024 Present: Sh. Anil K. Chhabra, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Sh. Sandeep Mahapatra, Ld. Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 through VC. Respondent no. 2 being the Ld. Arbitrator is a proforma party. Ld. Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 states that he will file his memo of appearance during course of the day. Let it be filed. At request, list the matter now on 18.01.2025 for reply/arguments on petition. Though it is being stated that the award under challenge was passed by the Ld. Arbitrator appointment unilaterally by respondent no.1, but Ld. Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 submits that question of limitation is involved and some other points are also involved and will required to be answered. As per report of Ahlmad, the arbitral record has not been received. The status of notice sent to Ld. Arbitrator is also not clear. Hence, let a fresh notice be issued to him for next date of hearing. (M. K. Nagpal) District Judge, Commercial Court-13 Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/06.12.2024(s) -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 221 Oct 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM) No. 94/24 Shiv Brothers Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat & Anr. 21.10.2024 Present: Sh. Anil K. Chhabra, Ld. Counsel for petitioner through VC. Heard. Let notice of the petition be issued to the respondent No.1 by all prescribed modes i.e. through email, Whatsapp, registered AD-speed post and approved Courier and through Process Server/processing agency returnable on 06.12.2024, subject to filing of PF, RC/AD deposit of necessary charges within 7 days. Process may also be taken dasti, if desired. List the matter now on 06.12.2024 awaiting service report/further proceedings. Arbitral record be also summoned from the Ld. Arbitrator, which has been formally impleaded as respondent No. 2 in the present petition. (M. K. Nagpal) District Judge, Commercial Court-13 Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/21.10.2024(s) -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 119 Oct 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM)94/24 M/s Shiv Brothers Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat & Anr. 19.10.2024 Fresh petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 received through e-filing by way of random allocation by computer. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present: None. Hard copy of petition and other documents have been filed today. However, none has turned up on behalf of petitioner despite waiting till 4.4pm. Hence, list the matter now on 21.10.2024 for consideration. (M. K. Nagpal) District Judge, Commercial Court-13 Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/19.10.2024(s) -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1805 May 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) No. 94/24 M/S Shiv Brother Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat 05.05.2026 Present: Ms. Ritika, proxy counsel for Sh. Anil Chhabra Ld. counsel for petitioner. Sh. Jagdish Chandra Solanki Ld. Standing Counsel for respondent (through VC). Sh. Sanjiv Kumar, ASO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Sh. Raj Kumar for petitioner present in person. Arguments heard on petition u/sec 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Put up for orders on 15.05.2026. Parties are at liberty to file written submissions before NDOH. (Rakesh Pandit) District Judge (Commercial Court)-13/ Central/Tis Hazari/Delhi/05.05.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1728 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) No. 94/24 M/S Shiv Brother Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat 28.04.2026 Present: Sh. Anil Chhabra Ld. counsel for petitioner (through VC). Sh. Prashant Kumar Ld. Counsel for defendant Jagdish Chandra. Sh. Sanjiv Kumar, ASO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Sh. Raj Kumar for petitioner present in person. Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent. An application for waiver of cost filed on behalf fo respondent. Heard. No ground exists. Dismissed. Cost of Rs.2,000/- deposited. Receipt placed on record. Time sought to file reply to the petition. In the interest of justice granted. Put up for reply, if any, and arguments on petition u/sec.34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act on 05.05.2026. (Rakesh Pandit) District Judge (Commercial Court)-13/ Central/Tis Hazari/Delhi/28.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1621 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) No. 94/24 M/S Shiv Brother Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat 21.04.2026 Present: Ms. Ritika proxy counsel for Sh. Anil Chhabra with petitioner. Sh. Sanjiv Kumar, ASO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Again time sought by respondent to argue the objections petition u/sec.34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act on the similar ground that new counsel is not appointed. In the interest of justice last and final opportunity is granted to the respondent but subject to cost of Rs.2,000/- to be deposited with DLSA, Central, THC. Put up for arguments on objections petition u/sec.34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act on 28.04.2026. (Rakesh Pandit) District Judge (Commercial Court)-13/ Central/Tis Hazari/Delhi/21.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1513 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM) No. 94/24 M/S Shiv Brother Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat 13.03.2026 Present: Ms. Ritika proxy counsel for Sh. Anil Chhabra with petitioner. Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO, Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Adjourment sought on behalf of respondent on the ground that a new counsel is to be appointed as the tenure of old advocate is over. At request, put up on 21.04.2026 for further proceedings. (Rakesh Pandit) District Judge (Commercial Court)-13/ Central/Tis Hazari/Delhi/13.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1413 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) No.94/24 M/S Shiv Brother Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat 13.02.2026 Present: Sh. Anil Chhabra Ld. counsel for petitioner through VC. Ms. Ritika proxy counsel for Sh. Anil Chhabra with petitioner. Sh. Sandeep Kumar Mohapatra Ld. counsel for respondent no. 1 through VC. Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1. Respondent no.2 is a performa party being the Ld. Arbitrator. Part arguments heard on petition u/sec.34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act. At request, put up for further arguments on petition u/sec.34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act on 13.03.2026. (Rakesh Pandit) District Judge (Commercial Court)13/ Central/Tis Hazari/Delhi/13.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 08.01.2026 Present: Ms. Ritik, Ld. Proxy Counsel for petitioner along with petitioner Sh. Raj Kumar. Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 through VC. Sh. Ashutosh Awasthi, Under Secretary, Sh. Ishwar Chandra Sahoo, AEO and Sh. Sanjiv Kumar, ASO on behalf of respondent no. 1. Respondent no.2 is a performa party being the Ld. Arbitrator. Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 1 submits…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 08.01.2026 Present: Ms. Ritik, Ld. Proxy Counsel for petitioner along with petitioner Sh. Raj Kumar. Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 through VC. Sh. Ashutosh Awasthi, Under Secretary, Sh. Ishwar Chandra Sahoo, AEO and Sh. Sanjiv Kumar, ASO on behalf of respondent no. 1. Respondent no.2 is a performa party being the Ld. Arbitrator. Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 1 submits…
Order 1127 Nov 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.)94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 27.11.2025 Present: Ms. Ritika, Ld. Proxy Counsel for petitioner. Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 1. Ms. Aditi Jha, Ld. Counsel for Arbitrator /Respondent no. 2. Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO and Sh. Rahul Mehra, SSA from Rajya Sabha Secretariat/respondent no. 1. Some more time is being requested on behalf of respondent no. 1 for tracing out the original arbitral record from the office of Rajya Sabha Secretariat. List the matter now on 08.01.2026 for above purpose as well as arguments. (M. K. Nagpal) District Judge, Commercial Court-13 Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/27.11.2025 (p) -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1020 Sept 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 20.09.2025 Present: Sh. Anil Kumar Chabbra, Ld. Counsel for petitioner through VC. Sh. Raj Kumar on behalf of plaintiff firm in person. Sh. Sandeep Mahapatra, Ld. Standing Counsel and Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1. Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO & Sh. Rahul Mehra, SA from respondent no.1. Ld. Arbitrator/respondent no.2 in person. Dasti notice of Ld. Arbitrator/respondent no.2 has been brought on behalf of petitioner as served. Though Ld. Arbitrator has brought some documents, but the same are observed to be photocopies of few of the documents forming part of arbitral record. He states that he is not able to trace out the original arbitral record and except the above documents, no other documents could be traced out by him. Ld. Arbitrator is being given time till next date to trace out the original arbitral record and to file it in the court. List the matter now on 28.10.2025 for above said purpose/arguments. (M. K. Nagpal) District Judge, Commercial Court-13 Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/20.09.2025(s) -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.)94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 21.08.2025 Present: None for petitioner. Sh. Sandeep Mahapatra, Ld. Standing Counsel and Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld Counsel for respondent no. 1 through VC. Respondent no. 2 being the Ld. Arbitrator is a proforma party. Sh. Mahesh Baluni, EO and Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO are present. Though re-joinder by petitioner to the reply filed by respondent no. 1 to this petition has not been filed,…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 8OMP (COMM.)94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 26.07.2025 Present: Sh. Anil Kumar Chabbra, Ld. Counsel for petitioner through VC. Sh. Sandeep Mahapatra, Ld. Standing Counsel (through VC) and Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 1. Respondent no. 2 being the Ld. Arbitrator is a proforma party. A notice of the Ld. Arbitrator stands duly served for today, but still he has not cared to sent the complete arbitral record…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 12 OMP (COMM.) 94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 03.06.2025 Present: Sh. Kaartik Chhabra, Ld. Proxy Counsel for petitioner. Sh. Sandeep Mahapatra, Ld. Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 through VC and Sh. Tribhuvan, Advocate, along with Sh. Mahesh Balvni, EO & Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO, are present physically in court. Respondent no.2 being the Ld. Arbitrator is a proforma party. Rejoinder/replication on behalf of petitioner to the reply of respondent…
Order 626 Apr 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 26.04.2025 Present: Sh. Raj Kumar on behalf petitioner along with Ld. Proxy Counsel Sh. Saurabh Pundir. Sh. Sandeep Mahapatra, Ld. Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 through VC and Sh. Tribhuvan, Advocate, along with Sh. Mahesh Balvni, EO & Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO, are present physically in court. Respondent no.2 being the Ld. Arbitrator is a proforma party. Rejoinder on behalf of petitioner to the reply of respondent no.1 has not been filed and it is stated that the same shall be filed during course of the day. Let the same be filed and a copy thereof be also supplied to the other counsel. Notice was also issued for today to the Ld. Arbitrator summoning the complete arbitral record, but the process has not been received back. Let the process be repeated and it may also be taken dasti to be served by petitioner. At joint request, list the matter now 03.06.2025 awaiting filing of rejoinder as well as for arguments. (M. K. Nagpal) District Judge, Commercial Court-13 Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/26.04.2025(s) -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.)94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 22.03.2025 Present: Sh. Kartik Chabbra, Ld. Proxy Counsel for petitioner through VC and Sh. Raj Kumar on behalf petitioner present physically. Sh. Sandeep Mahapatra, Ld. Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 through VC and Sh. Tribhuvan, Advocate, along with Sh. Mahesh Balvni, EO & Sh. Nagendra Kumar, AEO, are present physically in court. Respondent no.2 being the Ld. Arbitrator is a proforma party. Reply…
Order 418 Jan 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.)94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 18.01.2025 Present: Sh. Saurabh Pundir, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Sh. Sandeep Kumar Maha Patra with Sh. Tribhuvan, Ld. Counsels for respondent no. 1 with Sh. Mahesh Baluni (AEO), Sh. I. C. Sahoo, (AEO) and Sh. Ngendra Kumar (AEO). Fresh vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 1 stands already filed through e-mode and hard copy thereof has been placed on record today. Arbitral record has not been received as the address of Ld. arbitrator/respondent no. 2 is reported to be incomplete. Let the complete address of Ld. arbitrator be furnished and steps be taken again within a week for summoning the arbitral record from him for next date. Put up on 22.02.2025 awaiting arbitral record as well as reply/objections, if any, as last opportunity and arguments on the point of limitation. (M. K. Nagpal) District Judge, Commercial Court-13 Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/18.01.2025(p) -- 1 of 1 --
Order 306 Dec 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 94/24 M/S SHIV BROTHER Vs. RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT 06.12.2024 Present: Sh. Anil K. Chhabra, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Sh. Sandeep Mahapatra, Ld. Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 through VC. Respondent no. 2 being the Ld. Arbitrator is a proforma party. Ld. Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 states that he will file his memo of appearance during course of the day. Let it be filed. At request, list the matter now on 18.01.2025 for reply/arguments on petition. Though it is being stated that the award under challenge was passed by the Ld. Arbitrator appointment unilaterally by respondent no.1, but Ld. Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 submits that question of limitation is involved and some other points are also involved and will required to be answered. As per report of Ahlmad, the arbitral record has not been received. The status of notice sent to Ld. Arbitrator is also not clear. Hence, let a fresh notice be issued to him for next date of hearing. (M. K. Nagpal) District Judge, Commercial Court-13 Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/06.12.2024(s) -- 1 of 1 --
Order 221 Oct 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM) No. 94/24 Shiv Brothers Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat & Anr. 21.10.2024 Present: Sh. Anil K. Chhabra, Ld. Counsel for petitioner through VC. Heard. Let notice of the petition be issued to the respondent No.1 by all prescribed modes i.e. through email, Whatsapp, registered AD-speed post and approved Courier and through Process Server/processing agency returnable on 06.12.2024, subject to filing of PF, RC/AD deposit of necessary charges within 7 days. Process may also be taken dasti, if desired. List the matter now on 06.12.2024 awaiting service report/further proceedings. Arbitral record be also summoned from the Ld. Arbitrator, which has been formally impleaded as respondent No. 2 in the present petition. (M. K. Nagpal) District Judge, Commercial Court-13 Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/21.10.2024(s) -- 1 of 1 --
Order 119 Oct 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: OMP (COMM)94/24 M/s Shiv Brothers Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat & Anr. 19.10.2024 Fresh petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 received through e-filing by way of random allocation by computer. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present: None. Hard copy of petition and other documents have been filed today. However, none has turned up on behalf of petitioner despite waiting till 4.4pm. Hence, list the matter now on 21.10.2024 for consideration. (M. K. Nagpal) District Judge, Commercial Court-13 Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/19.10.2024(s) -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
