Final Order 30

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: M. Crl. No. 712/2023
Narian Gupta Vs. BSES YPL
12.12.2024
Present: Applicant is present.
Sh. Jitender Shankar, AR of the respondent company.
Applicant submits that he has filed an application for not
obeying the order dated 22.12.2020. It is further submitted by
applicant that a compromise was arrived between him and the
respondent company in CC No. 327719/2016, case titled as BYPL
Vs. Narain Kumar Gupta in the Mediation Center, THC, Delhi vide
order dated 16.12.2020. It is further submitted by the applicant that he
deposited the entire settlement amount and applied for new electricity
connection but the same was rejected due to dues on the property. He
further submitted that he met with Sh. Devender Pawar (Commercial
officer ) at Patel Nagar who directed him to deposit Rs. 1,50,000/- in
one shot to clear his dues for new electricity connection which he did
on 31.03.2021. It is further submitted that no electricity meter was
installed by BSES YPL despite payment of Rs. 1,50,000/-. It is further
stated that now BSES YPL is demanding to clear the dues which
never pertains to him. It is prayed to initiate contempt proceedings
against the officer of the BSES YPL.
AR of the complainant company submits that the
aforesaid meter was settled in a particular case i.e. CC No.
327719/2016 whereas the amount of Rs. 3,50,000/- with LPSC is still
Contd…...2
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
due towards the applicant. It is further submitted that present
applicant has attended the metting of the respondent company and he
was apprised that if he pays a sum of Rs. 2,04,000/- i.e. previous
regular dues then his application for installation of the meter can be
considered after completion of commerical formalities.
Heard. Record perused.
Since the respondent company has already stated that
there is a due of Rs. 3,50,000/- with LPSC against the applicant,
therefore, the Mediation order dated 16.12.2020 is not helpful for
him. Moreover, Mediation order dated 16.12.2020 pertains to only
complaint bearing No. 327719/2016 whereas there is a regular
aforesaid dues against the property of the applicant. In the light of the
aforesaid fact, I am of the considered view that since there is no
contempt of any Court order, therefore, the present application
seeking the relief of initiate the contempt proceedings against the
BSES YPL is not maintainable. Accordingly, same is dismissed.
File be consigned to record room.
(R.L. Meena)
ASJ/Special Judge, Electricity
Court No.02, Central
Tis Hazari/Delhi/12.12.2024
-- 2 of 2 --