Full Order Text
Order 6 · 16 Sept 2026 · CNR DLCT010123702025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 MCA DJ 56/25 P V RAGHUNANDAN Vs. BHARAT CHAWLA 16.09.2026 Present: Appellant is present through VC. None for the respondent. Ordinary summons issued to the respondent received back unserved with the report that, ‘that on the given address nameplate of the respondent namely Bharat Chawla is affixed and despite several attempts no one opens the door’. As per the report on the summons the process server attempted to execute the process twice, first on 07.05.2026 and then on 14.05.2026 and on both the dates same report is given. The summons sent by post have been received back unserved with the report ‘no such person’ and along with remarks that ‘always door locked from so many days’. Heard. Perused. Satisfied that respondent is concealing himself so that service of process cannot be affected on him. Issue fresh summons to the respondent subject to filing of fresh PF with clear endorsement that process be served only by way of affixation. The process server shall take -- 1 of 2 -- -2- photographs of the affixation and send the same along with his report. The copy of the plaint and the annexing documents may be reused for summoning. As such, the appellant needs to file only the process fees. Today, during the course of hearing it has transpired that the appellant has filed 11 different appeals against the same respondent for dismissal of his 11 applications filed under Section 340 Cr.PC. It is conceded that all the 11 applications have been dismissed by the same Trial Court and the 11 appeals are pending before different courts in Tis Hazari. In order to avoid conflicting decision and to maintain judicial consistency, it is imperative that all the appeals are heard by one and same court, but not by different appellate courts. Appellant is directed to take necessary steps by the next date of hearing ensuring that all the appeals come before the same court. Re-notify on 16.12.2026. Date is given at specific request of appellant. (Sumeet Anand) DJ-11/Central/THC Delhi/16.09.2026(d) -- 2 of 2 --
