Interim Order 45

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Interim Bail Extension Application
STATE Vs. Tushar Goel, FIR NO. 455/24
PS Special Cell, U/s 8(c)/20/21/25/27(A)/29 NDPS Act
19.02.2026
Present: Sh. Akhand Pratap Singh, Ld. Special Addl. PP for
State(through VC).
Sh. Vimal Tyagi (through VC) and Sh. Sudhanshu
Tyagi (physically), Ld. counsels for the applicant/
accused.
IO SI Shailesh Kumar in person.
Reply to the application to extend the interim bail of
applicant/ accused Tushar Goyal is filed. Copy supplied.
Arguments heard.
Ld. counsels for the applicant/ accused submit that
the interim bail was granted to the applicant/ accused for the
surgery/ treatment of his mother from 04.02.2026 to 18.02.2026.
They further submit that the mother of the applicant/ accused had
undergone surgery on 12.02.2026 and thereafter, she was
discharged on 13.02.2026. According to them, the Doctor has
advised her for follow-up with Dr. Sunny Chopra and regular
medications are also advised. They further submit that the mother
of the applicant/ accused is also advised medical rest for eight
weeks and she is further advised to avoid exertion forward
bending over spine, dressing every 5th day in OPD as well as high
protein diet.
They further submit that since the applicant/ accused
has to take care of his mother after surgery, therefore, they have
filed the present application to extend the interim bail of the
applicant/ accused for a period of eight weeks.
Per contra, Ld. Special PP for the State as well as IO
have vehemently opposed the bail application of the applicant/
Contd/-…
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
accused. They argue that earlier, the surgery of mother of the
applicant/ accused was to be conducted on 06.02.2026 in
different hospital but surgery has been conducted only on
12.02.2026 that also from another hospital. They further submit
that the applicant/ accused has not clarified or explained as to
why the surgery was not conducted on 06.02.2026 or as to why it
was conducted only on 12.02.2026.
They further submit that the mother of the applicant/
accused was discharged on 13.02.2026. According to them,
interim bail is granted for emergent situations only and emergent
situation i.e. surgery of mother of the applicant/ accused has
already been conducted. They further submit that there is father
of the applicant/ accused as well as other family members to look
after the mother of the applicant/ accused after surgery period
and there is no physical requirement of accused/ applicant to take
care of his mother and therefore, they request that the application
should be dismissed.
In rebuttal, Ld. counsels for the applicant/ accused
submit that IO himself had verified from the concerned doctor
and as per point no. 5, Doctor concerned has replied that the
patient was discharged after 24 hours of surgery but she needs
medical rest for 08 to 10 weeks and care. According to Ld.
counsels for the applicant/ accused, the father of the applicant/
accused is about 75 years old and according to them, he cannot
take care of mother of the applicant/ accused. They further
submit that the mother of the applicant/ accused is totally bed-
ridden and she is not able to do her day to day affairs also and
Contd/-…
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
therefore, the presence of the applicant/ accused is required.
After specific query by Ld. Special PP for the state,
Ld. counsels for the applicant/ accused submit that there is no
house-help in the house of the applicant/ accused.
Submissions considered. Record perused.
Admittedly, the mother of the applicant/ accused has
undergone surgery on 12.02.2026. As per reply filed by the IO
itself, the mother of the applicant/ accused requires medical rest
for eight to ten weeks and as per prescription, she is also advised
to avoid exertion forward bending over spine and dressing after
every 5th day in OPD. The father of the applicant/ accused is
about 75 years old and appilcant/ accused is the only son of his
parents. The medical documents of the mother of the applicant/
accused have been duly verified by the IO. Therefore, on
humanitarian ground only, the interim bail of the applicant/
accused Tushar Goyal is hereby extended for a period of 10 days
from today (i.e. w.e.f. 19.02.2026 till 28.02.2026) on the same
terms and condition of interim bail order dated 03.02.2026 as
well as on the same bail bonds.
The applicant/ accused Tushar Goyal shall surrender
on 01.03.2026 before the concerned Jail Authority.
The present extension of interim bail application of
the applicant/ accused stands disposed of accordingly.
Copy of the order be given dasti to the learned
counsel for applicant/ accused as well as IO. Another copy be
sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary
intimation/ information.
(Virender Singh)
Special Judge, NDPS,
Central,THC, Delhi/19.02.2026
-- 3 of 3 --