Interim Order 17

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: SC No.: 452/2024
FIR No. : 175/2023
PS : Timarpur
State v. Rohit @ Tulla
11.04.2026
Present: Sh.Vikram Dubey, Ld. Substitute Addl. PP for State.
Sh. Hari Krishan, Ld. Counsel for accused/applicant
Rohit @ Tulla.
IO SI Ashok Kumar in person.
Arguments heard.
This order shall dispose of an application for bail u/s
483 BNSS filed on behalf of accused/applicant Rohit @ Tulla.
The application is contested by the prosecution.
Ld. Counsel for the accused/applicant Rohit @ Tulla
submitted that accused has been falsely implicated in the present
case; nothing incriminating has been recovered from the
possession of the accused/applicant; only offence punishable u/s
341/326/506/34 IPC has been made out against accused/applicant
which are bailable offences; investigation in the present has
already been completed. He further submitted PW/complainant
Sumit has not supported the prosecution case; the
applicant/accused is only 20 years of age; he has clean
antecedents; accused/applicant is ready to abide by all the terms
and conditions imposed by this Court; no purpose would be
served by keeping the accused/applicant behind bars any further;
Hence, he be granted concession of bail.
Ld. Substitute Addl. PP for the State, on the other
hand, submitted that the allegations against the accused/applicant
are grave and serious in nature and thus, the bail application is
-- 1 of 3 --
-2-
liable to be dismissed.
I have considered the rival submissions and have
gone through the case file.
The present FIR was registered on the complaint of
complainant Sumit who stated that on 06.03.2023 at about 7:00
p.m., accused Khempal along with his friend Tarun and 2-3 other
persons came and stated that they will teach him a lesson for
having fought with them on the night of Shivratri. Thereafter,
Tarun, Khempal and their 2-3 companions started beating him.
Tarun caught hold of his hands and Khempal assaulted him with
a knife in his back. All the accused persons fled away.
During trial, the complainant/injured Sumit in his
testimony before the Court as PW1 did not support the
prosecution case and stated that he could not see the faces of the
assailants. He further stated that police took his signatures on
some papers but he did not remember whether those papers were
blank or something was written. He categorically stated that the
accused persons present in the Court were not the assailants. The
witness was declared hostile by the Ld. CPP for the State and was
cross-examined but nothing material could be extracted.
Accordingly, applicant / accused Rohit @ Tulla is
admitted to bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of
Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction
of this Court and subject to the following conditions that :-
i) That the accused / applicant shall not, directly or indirectly
make any inducement, threat or promise to any person
-- 2 of 3 --
-3-
acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from
disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police official;
ii) That the accused / applicant shall continue to appear before
the Court on each date of hearing;
iii) That the accused / applicant shall not repeat the offence.
The bail application is disposed of.
A copy of order be given dasti to Ld. Counsel for
applicant / accused.
A copy of this order be sent to the accused through
the Jail Superintendent for information.
(Nishant Garg)
ASJ-06 (Central),
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
11.04.2026
-- 3 of 3 --