SHRADHA MALIKVsIQ CONSULTANCY AND ORS.

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 33/25
SHRADHA MALIK Vs. IQ CONSULTANCY AND ORS.
01.09.2025
Present: Sh. Utkarsh Vats, Learned counsel for petitoner,
through VC.
Learned counsel for respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks two days
time to comply with the previous orders.
Learned counsel for the respondent has vehemently
argued on the maintainability of this petition and submitted that
as per requirement of Section 19 of MSMED Act, the petitioner
is required to deposit 75% of the awarded amount at the time of
filing the petition.
I could lay my hand on the judgment passed by
Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in
Kings Furnishing and Safe
Company Vs. Central University of Jharkhand [2024:DHC:1658]
wherein the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi has liberally taken this
requirement and afforded an opportunity to the petitioner to de-
posit the amount and directed not to entertain the application by
that time.
Last and final opportunity granted to the petitioner
to comply the order within three days from today.
To come up for consideration on 12.09.2025.
(NEELAM SINGH)
District Judge
Commercial Court-06, Central
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
01.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 33/25
SHRADHA MALIK Vs. IQ CONSULTANCY AND ORS.
25.08.2025
Bar is on strike today in terms of Circular dated
23.08.2025 of Co-ordination Committee, All District Courts Bar
Associations of Delhi.
Present: Learned counsel for respondent no.1, through VC.
To come up for further consideration on 01.09.2025.
(NEELAM SINGH)
District Judge
Commercial Court-06, Central
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
25.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 33/25
SHRADHA MALIK Vs. IQ CONSULTANCY AND ORS.
22.08.2025
Bar is on strike today in terms of Circular dated
21.08.2025 of Co-ordination Committee, All District Courts Bar
Associations of Delhi.
Present: None for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for respondent through VC.
Compliance of previous order has not been made by
the petitioner in any manner. Since, the Bar is on strike today, I
am not inclined to pass any adverse order against the petitioner
today, hence, the matter is adjourned for 25.08.2025 for further
consideration.
(NEELAM SINGH)
District Judge
Commercial Court-06, Central
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
22.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 33/25
SHRADHA MALIK Vs. IQ CONSULTANCY AND ORS.
01.08.2025
Present: Sh. Kunal Mittal, Learned counsel for petitioner,
through VC.
Sh.Ashish Verma, Learned counsel for respondent.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondents.
On the last date of hearing, inadvertently notice was
issued upon the concerned official of DIAC, however, notice was
sought to be issued against the concerned official of DAC, Tis
Hazari Courts.
It is submitted by learned counsel for respondent
that the present Award is passed under MSME Act and as a
pre-requisite to the Act, the plaintiff be directed to deposit 75%
of the decretal amounts in order to entertain the present petition.
Accordingly, the decree holder is directed to deposit
75% of the decretal amount within a week from today.
Thereafter, Ahlmad is directed to issue fresh notice upon DAC,
Central, Tis Hazari to summon the records pertaining to Award
and also the communication and date when the copy of Award
has been sent/delivered to the parties, on filing of PF by the
petitioner.
Put up for further consideration on 22.08.2025.
(NEELAM SINGH)
District Judge
Commercial Court-06, Central
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
01.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM) 33/2025
SHRADHA MALIK Vs. IQ CONSULTANCY & OTHERS
07.07.2025
Fresh petition u/s 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
received by way of e-filing. It be checked and registered.
Present: Mr. Kunal Mittal, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Heard. Considered.
Issue notice to the concerned official, DIAC, Delhi
High Court to summon the record pertaining to the award and
also the communications and date when the copy of the award
has been sent/ delivered to the parties on filing of PF by the peti-
tioner. Steps be taken within 5 days from today.
Put up for further consideration on 01.08.2025.
(NEELAM SINGH)
District Judge
Commercial Court-06
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
07.07.2025AD
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 33/25
SHRADHA MALIK Vs. IQ CONSULTANCY AND ORS.
01.09.2025
Present: Sh. Utkarsh Vats, Learned counsel for petitoner,
through VC.
Learned counsel for respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks two days
time to comply with the previous orders.
Learned counsel for the respondent has vehemently
argued on the maintainability of this petition and submitted that
as per requirement of Section 19 of MSMED Act, the petitioner
is required to deposit 75% of the awarded amount at the time of
filing the petition.
I could lay my hand on the judgment passed by
Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in
Kings Furnishing and Safe
Company Vs. Central University of Jharkhand [2024:DHC:1658]
wherein the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi has liberally taken this
requirement and afforded an opportunity to the petitioner to de-
posit the amount and directed not to entertain the application by
that time.
Last and final opportunity granted to the petitioner
to comply the order within three days from today.
To come up for consideration on 12.09.2025.
(NEELAM SINGH)
District Judge
Commercial Court-06, Central
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
01.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 33/25
SHRADHA MALIK Vs. IQ CONSULTANCY AND ORS.
25.08.2025
Bar is on strike today in terms of Circular dated
23.08.2025 of Co-ordination Committee, All District Courts Bar
Associations of Delhi.
Present: Learned counsel for respondent no.1, through VC.
To come up for further consideration on 01.09.2025.
(NEELAM SINGH)
District Judge
Commercial Court-06, Central
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
25.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 33/25
SHRADHA MALIK Vs. IQ CONSULTANCY AND ORS.
22.08.2025
Bar is on strike today in terms of Circular dated
21.08.2025 of Co-ordination Committee, All District Courts Bar
Associations of Delhi.
Present: None for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for respondent through VC.
Compliance of previous order has not been made by
the petitioner in any manner. Since, the Bar is on strike today, I
am not inclined to pass any adverse order against the petitioner
today, hence, the matter is adjourned for 25.08.2025 for further
consideration.
(NEELAM SINGH)
District Judge
Commercial Court-06, Central
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
22.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 33/25
SHRADHA MALIK Vs. IQ CONSULTANCY AND ORS.
01.08.2025
Present: Sh. Kunal Mittal, Learned counsel for petitioner,
through VC.
Sh.Ashish Verma, Learned counsel for respondent.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondents.
On the last date of hearing, inadvertently notice was
issued upon the concerned official of DIAC, however, notice was
sought to be issued against the concerned official of DAC, Tis
Hazari Courts.
It is submitted by learned counsel for respondent
that the present Award is passed under MSME Act and as a
pre-requisite to the Act, the plaintiff be directed to deposit 75%
of the decretal amounts in order to entertain the present petition.
Accordingly, the decree holder is directed to deposit
75% of the decretal amount within a week from today.
Thereafter, Ahlmad is directed to issue fresh notice upon DAC,
Central, Tis Hazari to summon the records pertaining to Award
and also the communication and date when the copy of Award
has been sent/delivered to the parties, on filing of PF by the
petitioner.
Put up for further consideration on 22.08.2025.
(NEELAM SINGH)
District Judge
Commercial Court-06, Central
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
01.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM) 33/2025
SHRADHA MALIK Vs. IQ CONSULTANCY & OTHERS
07.07.2025
Fresh petition u/s 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
received by way of e-filing. It be checked and registered.
Present: Mr. Kunal Mittal, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Heard. Considered.
Issue notice to the concerned official, DIAC, Delhi
High Court to summon the record pertaining to the award and
also the communications and date when the copy of the award
has been sent/ delivered to the parties on filing of PF by the peti-
tioner. Steps be taken within 5 days from today.
Put up for further consideration on 01.08.2025.
(NEELAM SINGH)
District Judge
Commercial Court-06
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
07.07.2025AD
-- 1 of 1 --