Madan Lal Arora +1 moreVsRAJENDER SHARMA +1 more

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 26 CS DJ No. 564/24
Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
29.07.2026
Present: None.
Order is under dictation.
Put up for orders on 30.07.2026.
(Sumeet Anand)
District Judge-11/Central/THC
29.07.2026(s)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 26 CS DJ No. 564/24
Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
29.07.2026
Present: None.
Order is under dictation.
Put up for orders on 30.07.2026.
(Sumeet Anand)
District Judge-11/Central/THC
29.07.2026(s)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 27 CS DJ No. 564/24
Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
28.07.2026
Present: None.
Order is under dictation.
Put up for orders on 29.07.2026.
(Sumeet Anand)
District Judge-11/Central/THC
28.07.2026(s)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 27 CS DJ No. 564/24
Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
28.07.2026
Present: None.
Order is under dictation.
Put up for orders on 29.07.2026.
(Sumeet Anand)
District Judge-11/Central/THC
28.07.2026(s)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 18 CS DJ 564/24 Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
03.07.2026
Present: Sh. Sparash Bagga, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
along with plaintiff.
Sh. Sanjay Jha and Sh. Umag Jain, Ld. Counsels for
defendants.
No time left.
Put up for orders on 10.07.2026.
(Sumeet Anand)
DJ-11/Central/THC
Delhi/03.07.2026(d)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 18 CS DJ 564/24 Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
03.07.2026
Present: Sh. Sparash Bagga, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
along with plaintiff.
Sh. Sanjay Jha and Sh. Umag Jain, Ld. Counsels for
defendants.
No time left.
Put up for orders on 10.07.2026.
(Sumeet Anand)
DJ-11/Central/THC
Delhi/03.07.2026(d)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 17 CS DJ No. 564/24
Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
30.05.2026
Present: Plaintiff no.1 in person.
Sh. Umang Jain, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Plaintiff seeks adjournment on the ground that his
counsel has gone out of station. In this view, the right of the
plaintiff to address submissions on the point of maintainability of
the suit is hereby closed.
Submissions of the Ld. Counsel for defendant heard.
Ld. Counsel for defendant has drawn the attention of
this Court to the definition of a ‘Commercial Suit’, as defined
under Section 2 of Commercial Courts Act.
He argues that the contract of construction between
the parties was a joint venture and the plaintiffs themselves claim
to be builders. Thus, he argues that as the purpose of contract
between the parties was to earn profits, therefore, this is a dispute
of commercial nature. He prays that the suit may be
dismissed/plaint may be rejected.
Put up for orders/clarifications, if any on 03.07.2026
at 04:00 pm.
(Sumeet Anand)
District Judge-11/Central/THC
30.05.2026(s)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 17 CS DJ No. 564/24
Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
30.05.2026
Present: Plaintiff no.1 in person.
Sh. Umang Jain, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Plaintiff seeks adjournment on the ground that his
counsel has gone out of station. In this view, the right of the
plaintiff to address submissions on the point of maintainability of
the suit is hereby closed.
Submissions of the Ld. Counsel for defendant heard.
Ld. Counsel for defendant has drawn the attention of
this Court to the definition of a ‘Commercial Suit’, as defined
under Section 2 of Commercial Courts Act.
He argues that the contract of construction between
the parties was a joint venture and the plaintiffs themselves claim
to be builders. Thus, he argues that as the purpose of contract
between the parties was to earn profits, therefore, this is a dispute
of commercial nature. He prays that the suit may be
dismissed/plaint may be rejected.
Put up for orders/clarifications, if any on 03.07.2026
at 04:00 pm.
(Sumeet Anand)
District Judge-11/Central/THC
30.05.2026(s)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 27 CS DJ 564/24 Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
18.03.2026
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Sanjay Kumar Jha and Sh. Umang Jain, Ld.
Counsels for defendant.
Plaintiff seeks adjournment stating that his counsel is
not available today. Not opposed. Allowed.
Put up for arguments on the point of maintainability
on 30.05.2026.
(Sumeet Anand)
DJ-11/Central/THC
Delhi/18.03.2026(d)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 27 CS DJ 564/24 Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
18.03.2026
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Sanjay Kumar Jha and Sh. Umang Jain, Ld.
Counsels for defendant.
Plaintiff seeks adjournment stating that his counsel is
not available today. Not opposed. Allowed.
Put up for arguments on the point of maintainability
on 30.05.2026.
(Sumeet Anand)
DJ-11/Central/THC
Delhi/18.03.2026(d)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 27 CS DJ 564/24 Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
18.03.2026
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Sanjay Kumar Jha and Sh. Umang Jain, Ld.
Counsels for defendant.
Plaintiff seeks adjournment stating that his counsel is
not available today. Not opposed. Allowed.
Put up for arguments on the point of maintainability
on 30.05.2026.
(Sumeet Anand)
DJ-11/Central/THC
Delhi/18.03.2026(d)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 27 CS DJ 564/24 Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
18.03.2026
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Sanjay Kumar Jha and Sh. Umang Jain, Ld.
Counsels for defendant.
Plaintiff seeks adjournment stating that his counsel is
not available today. Not opposed. Allowed.
Put up for arguments on the point of maintainability
on 30.05.2026.
(Sumeet Anand)
DJ-11/Central/THC
Delhi/18.03.2026(d)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Ld. Presiding Officer was on short leave today and commenced the court at
11:00 am.
Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
04.02.2026
Present: Sh. Pawan Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through
VC.
Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff in person.
Sh. Sanjay Kumar Jha and Sh. Umang Jain, Ld.
Counsels for defendant.
Adjournment sought by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
on the ground that he is unwell and he does not have his court file.
Opposed by Ld. Counsel for defendant. In the interest of justice
adjournment granted.
In case, no arguments are addressed on next date of
hearing, the issue of maintainability will be decided on the basis of
material available on record.
Put up for arguments on the point of maintainability
as last and final opportunity on 18.03.2026.
(Sumeet Anand)
DJ-11/Central/THC
Delhi/04.02.2026(d)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Ld. Presiding Officer was on short leave today and commenced the court at
11:00 am.
Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
04.02.2026
Present: Sh. Pawan Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through
VC.
Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff in person.
Sh. Sanjay Kumar Jha and Sh. Umang Jain, Ld.
Counsels for defendant.
Adjournment sought by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
on the ground that he is unwell and he does not have his court file.
Opposed by Ld. Counsel for defendant. In the interest of justice
adjournment granted.
In case, no arguments are addressed on next date of
hearing, the issue of maintainability will be decided on the basis of
material available on record.
Put up for arguments on the point of maintainability
as last and final opportunity on 18.03.2026.
(Sumeet Anand)
DJ-11/Central/THC
Delhi/04.02.2026(d)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 8 CS DJ No. 564/24
Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
02.12.2025
Ld. Presiding Officer was on short leave and
commenced the court at 11:00 am.
Present: Sh. Pawan Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through
VC.
Sh. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Sh. Umang Jain, Sh. Vikash
Kumar, Ld. Counsels for defendant.
Matter received back from mediation as not settled.
The case is at the stage of framing of issues.
Put up for consideration and arguments on the point
that whether the present suit in its present form is maintainable
before this court, or whether the present suit is barred under the
provisions of Commercial Courts Act as the transaction between
the parties is commercial in nature.
Put up for arguments on this point on 04.02.2026.
(Sumeet Anand)
District Judge-11/Central/THC
02.12.2025(s)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 8 CS DJ No. 564/24
Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
02.12.2025
Ld. Presiding Officer was on short leave and
commenced the court at 11:00 am.
Present: Sh. Pawan Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through
VC.
Sh. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Sh. Umang Jain, Sh. Vikash
Kumar, Ld. Counsels for defendant.
Matter received back from mediation as not settled.
The case is at the stage of framing of issues.
Put up for consideration and arguments on the point
that whether the present suit in its present form is maintainable
before this court, or whether the present suit is barred under the
provisions of Commercial Courts Act as the transaction between
the parties is commercial in nature.
Put up for arguments on this point on 04.02.2026.
(Sumeet Anand)
District Judge-11/Central/THC
02.12.2025(s)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ No. 564/24
Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
20.09.2025
Present: Sh. Anil Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff no. 2 and son of plaintiff no. 1.
Sh. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Ld. Counsel for both the
defendants alongwith defendant no. 1.
It is jointly reported by the parties that mediation has
failed. Be awaited for report from Mediation Centre.
Put up for framing of issues on 02.12.2025.
(Sumeet Anand)
DJ-11/Central/THC
Delhi/20.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ No. 564/24
Madan Lal Arora Vs. Rajender Sharma
20.09.2025
Present: Sh. Anil Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff no. 2 and son of plaintiff no. 1.
Sh. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Ld. Counsel for both the
defendants alongwith defendant no. 1.
It is jointly reported by the parties that mediation has
failed. Be awaited for report from Mediation Centre.
Put up for framing of issues on 02.12.2025.
(Sumeet Anand)
DJ-11/Central/THC
Delhi/20.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --