Order 20

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: SC No. : 317/2023
FIR No. : 285/2022
State. v. Kamal Singh @ Langda
PS : Gulabi Bagh
u/s : 328/379/34 IPC
05.08.2025
Present: Sh. Alok Saxena, Ld. CPP for the State.
Sh.Deepanshu Goswami, Ld. Counsel for
applicant/accused Kamal Singh @ Langda.
IO not present.
This order of mine shall dispose off the application
for grant of regular bail to the applicant / accused Kamal Singh
@ Langda.
Arguments on the bail application heard and the
application and IO report and the case file perused.
Considering the contention of applicant/accused that
the scooty recovered is bearing no. 3964 while the scooty which
belongs to the applicant/accused is bearing no. 3962. Also, the
applicant/accused contended that the site plan of the recovery of
said scooty has not been prepared by the IO and all these facts
shows that applicant/accused Kamal Singh @ Langda has been
falsely implicated and therefore, applicant/accused may kindly be
granted bail. But, this contention has been rightly rebutted by Ld.
CPP for the State on the ground that whether it is a case of
typographical error or any irregularity but the same should be
considered at the merits of the case and not at the stage of bail.
Ld. CPP for the State also contended that there are grave
allegations against the applicant/accused Kamal Singh @ Langda
because applicant/accused was not only the owner of the said
-- 1 of 3 --
-2-
scooty recovered but also, the said scooty contained the
stupefying substance which was used in the present case upon the
victim and therefore, applicant/accused is not entitled to bail.
Keeping in view the fact that grounds of parity is not
made out in favour of applicant/accused Kamal Singh @ Langda
to that of co-accused Gaurav @ Haddi as the allegations against
applicant/accused Kamal are that the stupefying substance which
was given to the complainant was recovered from his scooty.
Also, as per IO report, in the CCTV footage, applicant/accused
Kamal Singh @ Langda was clearly seen alongwith other co-
accused near the place where the loaded rickshaw of complainant
was stolen. Also, the CDR of the mobile number used by
applicant/accused Kamal Singh Langda was near the spot of
incident and he was in regular touch with the co-accused. Thus,
the allegations against the applicant/accused Kamal Singh @
Langda are u/s 328/379/34 IPCand the allegations are grave and
serious in nature.
Keeping in view the fact that the case is at the initial
stage i.e. at the stage of charge and there is every likelihood that
applicant / accused Kamal Singh @ Langda would
influence/threaten the witnesses or would tamper with evidence,
if at liberty. Also, applicant/accused is a habitual offender as he is
previously involved in many criminal cases of similar nature. So,
I do not find any merit in the present application of the
applicant / accused Kamal Singh @ Langda. Hence, the present
application of the applicant / accused Kamal Singh @ Langda for
-- 2 of 3 --
-3-
grant of regular bail is hereby dismissed.
Application is disposed off accordingly.
This order of mine shall not effect the merits of the
case.
Copy of the order be given dasti to Ld. Counsel for
applicant / accused.
Copy of the order be sent to concerned Jail.
(Ekta Gauba Mann)
Special Judge (NDPS-01)
(Central) Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/05.08.2025
-- 3 of 3 --